275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30652627)
1. Toward greater involvement of youth with complex communication needs in the selection of augmentative and alternative communication devices.
Swett C; Surins H; Welton C; Shepherd TA; Renzoni AM; Ryan SE
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2020 Jan; 15(1):92-100. PubMed ID: 30652627
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Functional impact of augmentative and alternative communication scale: development of an outcome measure for educators of students with complex communication needs.
Ryan SE; Shepherd TA; Renzoni AM; D'Alessandro D; Oh A
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2023 Feb; 18(2):215-226. PubMed ID: 33155882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Responsiveness of a parent-reported outcome measure to evaluate AAC interventions for children and youth with complex communication needs.
Ryan SE; Shepherd TA; Renzoni AM; Servais M; Kingsnorth S; Laskey C; Ward K; Bradley K
Augment Altern Commun; 2018 Dec; 34(4):348-358. PubMed ID: 30369273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. "Now I am a techie too" - parental perceptions of using mobile technology for communication by children with complex communication needs in the Global South.
Hettiarachchi S; Kitnasamy G; Gopi D
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2020 Feb; 15(2):183-194. PubMed ID: 30735067
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Family impact of assistive technology scale: development of a measurement scale for parents of children with complex communication needs.
Delarosa E; Horner S; Eisenberg C; Ball L; Renzoni AM; Ryan SE
Augment Altern Commun; 2012 Sep; 28(3):171-80. PubMed ID: 22946992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. "I've had a love-hate, I mean mostly hate relationship with these PODD books": parent perceptions of how they and their child contributed to AAC rejection and abandonment.
Moorcroft A; Scarinci N; Meyer C
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2021 Jan; 16(1):72-82. PubMed ID: 31250678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Construct validity of the family impact of assistive technology scale for augmentative and alternative communication.
Kron AT; Kingsnorth S; Wright FV; Ryan SE
Augment Altern Commun; 2018 Dec; 34(4):335-347. PubMed ID: 30369255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Advancement to higher communicative functions with transition to iPad app - a case report.
Sreekumar S; G S S; Mathew BS
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2020 May; 15(4):480-483. PubMed ID: 31226910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measurement of the product attitudes of youth during the selection of assistive technology devices.
Ryan SE; Klejman S; Gibson BE
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2013 Jan; 8(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 22663084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The development and utilization of a scale to measure adolescents' attitudes toward peers who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) devices.
Beck AR; Thompson JR; Kosuwan K; Prochnow JM
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Jun; 53(3):572-87. PubMed ID: 20008679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Malaysian teachers' experience using augmentative and alternative communication with students.
Joginder Singh S; Diong ZZ; Mustaffa Kamal R
Augment Altern Commun; 2020 Jun; 36(2):107-117. PubMed ID: 32706287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measuring impact of augmentative and alternative communication interventions: adapting the family impact of assistive technology scale for augmentative and alternative communication (FIATS-AAC-No) for use in Norway.
Fjeldvang RT; Nordaas MG; von Tetzchner S; Stadskleiv K
Augment Altern Commun; 2023 Sep; 39(3):170-180. PubMed ID: 37539681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perceptions of the design of voice output communication aids.
Judge S; Townend G
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2013; 48(4):366-81. PubMed ID: 23889833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Chinese-English speaking family perspectives of augmentative and alternative communication use with their children.
Sun T; Bowles RP; Douglas SN
J Commun Disord; 2023; 102():106315. PubMed ID: 36822146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. AAC technologies for young children with complex communication needs: state of the science and future research directions.
Light J; Drager K
Augment Altern Commun; 2007 Sep; 23(3):204-16. PubMed ID: 17701740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perceptions of health care workers prescribing augmentative and alternative communication devices to children.
Lindsay S
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2010 May; 5(3):209-22. PubMed ID: 20302418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Experiences of adults with complex communication needs receiving and using low tech AAC: an Australian context.
Iacono T; Lyon K; Johnson H; West D
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2013 Sep; 8(5):392-401. PubMed ID: 23992458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Augmentative and alternative communication in the Philippines: a survey of speech-language pathologist competence, training, and practice.
Chua ECK; Gorgon EJR
Augment Altern Commun; 2019 Jun; 35(2):156-166. PubMed ID: 30887839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A recent survey of augmentative and alternative communication use and service delivery experiences of people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in the United States.
Peters B; O'Brien K; Fried-Oken M
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2024 May; 19(4):1121-1134. PubMed ID: 36448513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Parents' perception on the use of augmentative and alternative communication by children with complex communication needs in Malaysia.
Joginder Singh S; Mohd Ayob N; Hassan FH
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2023 Jan; 18(1):118-126. PubMed ID: 36344474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
