153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30652918)
1. Impact of cochlear tonotopy on electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs).
Christov F; Gluth MB; Hans S; Lang S; Arweiler-Harbeck D
Acta Otolaryngol; 2019 Jan; 139(1):22-26. PubMed ID: 30652918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cochlear Implantation with the CI512 and CI532 Precurved Electrode Arrays: One-Year Speech Recognition and Intraoperative Thresholds of Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials.
Videhult Pierre P; Eklöf M; Smeds H; Asp F
Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(6):299-308. PubMed ID: 31846976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of cochlear implant electrode array design on auditory nerve and behavioral response in children.
Telmesani LM; Said NM
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 May; 79(5):660-5. PubMed ID: 25746517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) in cochlear implant children: Changes in auditory nerve response in first year of cochlear implant use.
Telmesani LM; Said NM
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Mar; 82():28-33. PubMed ID: 26857311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Packing of the cochleostomy site affects auditory nerve response thresholds in precurved off-stylet cochlear implants.
Gordin A; Papsin B; Gordon K
Otol Neurotol; 2010 Feb; 31(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 20101160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Investigating the association of electrically-evoked compound action potential thresholds with inner-ear dimensions in pediatric cochlear implantation.
Söderqvist S; Sivonen V; Lamminmäki S; Ylönen J; Markkola A; Sinkkonen ST
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Jul; 158():111160. PubMed ID: 35544967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Site of cochlear stimulation and its effect on electrically evoked compound action potentials using the Nucleus24 cochlear implants].
Tian Y; Li W; Wang Z; Yang N; Hui L; Jiang X
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Nov; 26(22):1014-6, 1019. PubMed ID: 23379111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intraindividual comparison of psychophysical parameters between perimodiolar and lateral-type electrode arrays in patients with bilateral cochlear implants.
Jeong J; Kim M; Heo JH; Bang MY; Bae MR; Kim J; Choi JY
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Feb; 36(2):228-34. PubMed ID: 25473955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Site of cochlear stimulation and its effect on electrically evoked compound action potentials using the MED-EL standard electrode array.
Brill S; Müller J; Hagen R; Möltner A; Brockmeier SJ; Stark T; Helbig S; Maurer J; Zahnert T; Zierhofer C; Nopp P; Anderson I; Strahl S
Biomed Eng Online; 2009 Dec; 8():40. PubMed ID: 20015362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intraoperative Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential Growth and Maximum Amplitudes in Hearing Preservation Cochlear Implant Recipients.
Mussoi BS; Woodson E; Sydlowski S
Otol Neurotol; 2023 Apr; 44(4):e216-e222. PubMed ID: 36946363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Electrically evoked auditory nerve compound action potentials in Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant users].
Zhu X; Cao K; Pan T; Yang H; Wang Y
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Jan; 16(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 11944479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Electric compound action potentials (ECAPs) and impedances in an open and closed operative site during cochlear implantation.
Christov F; Gluth MB; Lahti SJ; Ludwig S; Hans S; Holtmann LC; Lang S; Arweiler-Harbeck D
Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 Jan; 20(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 30350745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evolution of cochlear implant arrays result in changes in behavioral and physiological responses in children.
Gordin A; Papsin B; James A; Gordon K
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):908-15. PubMed ID: 19730148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Site of prelingual cochlear stimulation and its effect on electrically evoked compound action potentials and refractory using the Nucleus 24 standard].
Ma RY; Li W; Jiang XJ
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Dec; 30(23):1854-1858. PubMed ID: 29798012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Toward a method of achieving balanced stimulation of bilateral auditory nerves: Evidence from children receiving matched and unmatched bilateral cochlear implants simultaneously.
Tsai P; Wisener N; Papsin BC; Cushing SL; Gordon KA
Hear Res; 2022 Mar; 416():108445. PubMed ID: 35104716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Electrically evoked amplitude modulation following response in cochlear implant candidates: comparison with auditory nerve response telemetry, subjective electrical stimulation, and speech perception.
Hirschfelder A; Gräbel S; Olze H
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Aug; 33(6):968-75. PubMed ID: 22772009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Characteristics of responsiveness of cochlear nerve to electrical stimulation in patients with cochlear nerve deficiency].
Chao XH; Luo JF; Wang RJ; Fan ZM; Wang HB; Xu L
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Jul; 58(7):657-665. PubMed ID: 37455110
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [The intraoperative application of neural response telemetry with the nucleus CI24M cochlear implant].
Yang H; Tang J; Cao K; Zhu X; Wang Y; Pan T
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Oct; 36(5):352-6. PubMed ID: 12761943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intraoperative findings on ECAP-measurement: normal or special case?
Müller A; Hocke T; Mir-Salim P
Int J Audiol; 2015 Apr; 54(4):257-64. PubMed ID: 25421058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Threshold dynamics of the auditory nerve electrically evoked compound action potential in implanted children].
Kechiyan DK; Bakhshinyan VV; Tavartkiladze GA
Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2020; 85(6):17-22. PubMed ID: 33474911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
