BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30652918)

  • 21. Using Neural Response Telemetry to Monitor Physiological Responses to Acoustic Stimulation in Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users.
    Abbas PJ; Tejani VD; Scheperle RA; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):409-425. PubMed ID: 28085738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The Effect of Electrode Position on Behavioral and Electrophysiologic Measurements in Perimodiolar Cochlear Implants.
    Collins A; Foghsgaard S; Druce E; Margani V; Mejia O; O'Leary S
    Otol Neurotol; 2024 Mar; 45(3):238-244. PubMed ID: 38238914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Does pediatric cochlear implant insertion technique affect intraoperative neural response telemetry thresholds?
    Poley M; Overmyer E; Craun P; Holcomb M; Reilly B; White D; Preciado D
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Sep; 79(9):1404-7. PubMed ID: 26166451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. ECAP analysis in cochlear implant patients as a function of patient's age and electrode-design.
    Christov F; Munder P; Berg L; Bagus H; Lang S; Arweiler-Harbeck D
    Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis; 2016 Jun; 133 Suppl 1():S1-3. PubMed ID: 27262349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Electrode interaction in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of straight and contour electrode arrays.
    Xi X; Ji F; Han D; Hong M; Chen A
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2009; 71(4):228-37. PubMed ID: 19707042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Electrically evoked compound action potentials are different depending on the site of cochlear stimulation.
    van de Heyning P; Arauz SL; Atlas M; Baumgartner WD; Caversaccio M; Chester-Browne R; Estienne P; Gavilan J; Godey B; Gstöttner W; Han D; Hagen R; Kompis M; Kuzovkov V; Lassaletta L; Lefevre F; Li Y; Müller J; Parnes L; Kleine Punte A; Raine C; Rajan G; Rivas A; Rivas JA; Royle N; Sprinzl G; Stephan K; Walkowiak A; Yanov Y; Zimmermann K; Zorowka P; Skarzynski H
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2016 Nov; 17(6):251-262. PubMed ID: 27900916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Electrophysiologic effects of placing cochlear implant electrodes in a perimodiolar position in young children.
    Wackym PA; Firszt JB; Gaggl W; Runge-Samuelson CL; Reeder RM; Raulie JC
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Jan; 114(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 14709998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Responsiveness of the Electrically Stimulated Cochlear Nerve in Children With Cochlear Nerve Deficiency.
    He S; Shahsavarani BS; McFayden TC; Wang H; Gill KE; Xu L; Chao X; Luo J; Wang R; He N
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):238-250. PubMed ID: 28678078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparative study of two different perimodiolar and a straight cochlear implant electrode array: surgical and audiological outcomes.
    Garaycochea O; Manrique-Huarte R; Lazaro C; Huarte A; Prieto C; Alvarez de Linera-Alperi M; Manrique M
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Jan; 277(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 31637478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Using evoked compound action potentials to assess activation of electrodes and predict C-levels in the Tempo+ cochlear implant speech processor.
    Alvarez I; de la Torre A; Sainz M; Roldán C; Schoesser H; Spitzer P
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):134-45. PubMed ID: 19838116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Electrophysiologic channel interaction, electrode pitch ranking, and behavioral threshold in straight versus perimodiolar cochlear implant electrode arrays.
    Hughes ML; Abbas PJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Mar; 119(3):1538-47. PubMed ID: 16583899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of a novel, noninvasive, objective test of auditory nerve function in cochlear implant candidates.
    Gräbel S; Hirschfelder A; Scheiber C; Olze H
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):716-24. PubMed ID: 19704358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds of pediatric cochlear implant recipients and its clinical application].
    Xi X; Hong MD; Han DY; Huang DL; Yang WY
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2003 Feb; 38(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 12778767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Is the spread of excitation different between adults and children cochlear implants users?
    Goffi-Gomez MVS; Corrêa FMDS; Magalhães AT; Hoshino AC; Samuel P; Sadowski T; Colalto C; Tsuji RK; Brito Neto R
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Jul; 281(7):3491-3498. PubMed ID: 38240771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Is There Any Correlation between Spread of Excitation Width and the Refractory Properties of the Auditory Nerve in Cochlear Implant Users?
    Coutinho da Silva J; Schmidt Goffi-Gomez MV; Tsuji RK; Bento R; Brito Neto R
    Audiol Neurootol; 2021; 26(2):85-94. PubMed ID: 32998132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Modeling the relationship between psychophysical perception and electrically evoked compound action potential threshold in young cochlear implant recipients: clinical implications for implant fitting.
    Thai-Van H; Truy E; Charasse B; Boutitie F; Chanal JM; Cochard N; Piron JP; Ribas S; Deguine O; Fraysse B; Mondain M; Uziel A; Collet L
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Dec; 115(12):2811-24. PubMed ID: 15546789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Electrophysiological detection of scalar changing perimodiolar cochlear electrode arrays: a long term follow-up study.
    Mittmann P; Todt I; Ernst A; Rademacher G; Mutze S; Göricke S; Schlamann M; Ramalingam R; Lang S; Christov F; Arweiler-Harbeck D
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Dec; 273(12):4251-4256. PubMed ID: 27351885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Relationship Between Peripheral and Psychophysical Measures of Amplitude Modulation Detection in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Tejani VD; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e268-e284. PubMed ID: 28207576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Electrophysiological spread of excitation and pitch perception for dual and single electrodes using the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant.
    Busby PA; Battmer RD; Pesch J
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):853-64. PubMed ID: 18633324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Potential Implications of Slim Modiolar Electrodes for Severely Malformed Cochleae: A Comparison With the Straight Array With Circumferential Electrodes.
    Lee SY; Choi BY
    Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Aug; 14(3):287-294. PubMed ID: 34098628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.