These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30652918)

  • 41. [The current tendencies and prospects of the neural response telemetry in the rehabilitation of the patients after cochlear implantation].
    Bakhshinian VV
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2014; (2):21-5. PubMed ID: 24781166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Incomplete partition type III revisited-long-term results following cochlear implant. German version].
    Alballaa A; Aschendorff A; Arndt S; Hildenbrand T; Becker C; Hassepass F; Laszig R; Beck R; Speck I; Wesarg T; Ketterer MC
    HNO; 2019 Oct; 67(10):760-768. PubMed ID: 31485697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Plasticity after pediatric cochlear implantation: Implication from changes in peripheral plasma level of BDNF and auditory nerve responses.
    Alemi R; Motassadi Zarandy M; Joghataei MT; Eftekharian A; Zarrindast MR; Vousooghi N
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Feb; 105():103-110. PubMed ID: 29447794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Systematic review of compound action potentials as predictors for cochlear implant performance.
    van Eijl RH; Buitenhuis PJ; Stegeman I; Klis SF; Grolman W
    Laryngoscope; 2017 Feb; 127(2):476-487. PubMed ID: 27804133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. ECAP, ESR and subjective levels for two different nucleus 24 electrode arrays.
    Polak M; Hodges A; Balkany T
    Otol Neurotol; 2005 Jul; 26(4):639-45. PubMed ID: 16015160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Measures of the electrically evoked compound action potential threshold and slope in HiRes 90K(TM) users.
    Nehmé A; El Zir E; Moukarzel N; Haidar H; Vanpoucke F; Arnold L
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 Jan; 15(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 24456380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Evaluation of objective test techniques in cochlear implant users with inner ear malformations.
    Cinar BC; Atas A; Sennaroglu G; Sennaroglu L
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Sep; 32(7):1065-74. PubMed ID: 21817941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Relation of electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds to behavioral T- and C-levels in children with cochlear implants.
    Holstad BA; Sonneveldt VG; Fears BT; Davidson LS; Aaron RJ; Richter M; Matusofsky M; Brenner CA; Strube MJ; Skinner MW
    Ear Hear; 2009 Feb; 30(1):115-27. PubMed ID: 19125034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in adults and children: effects of lateral to medial placement of the nucleus 24 contour electrode array.
    Runge-Samuelson C; Firszt JB; Gaggl W; Wackym PA
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Jun; 30(4):464-70. PubMed ID: 19300297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Auditory Performance and Electrical Stimulation Measures in Cochlear Implant Recipients With Auditory Neuropathy Compared With Severe to Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
    Attias J; Greenstein T; Peled M; Ulanovski D; Wohlgelernter J; Raveh E
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):184-193. PubMed ID: 28225734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Characteristics of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in patients with cochlear nerve canal stenosis receiving cochlear implants.
    Wang Z; Liu Y; Wang L; Shen X; Han S; Wang W; Gao F; Liang W; Peng KA
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Jan; 104():98-103. PubMed ID: 29287891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Cochlear response telemetry: intracochlear electrocochleography via cochlear implant neural response telemetry pilot study results.
    Campbell L; Kaicer A; Briggs R; O'Leary S
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Mar; 36(3):399-405. PubMed ID: 25473960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Measurement of electrical evoked middle latency response in cochlear implantation operation].
    Wang B; Cao KL; Wang Y; Lu Y
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Mar; 47(3):196-201. PubMed ID: 22805019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Effect of age, electrode array, and time on cochlear implant impedances.
    Velandia S; Martinez D; Goncalves S; Pena S; Bas E; Ein L; Prentiss S; Telischi F; Angeli S; Dinh CT
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 Nov; 21(6):344-352. PubMed ID: 32640889
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effect of Proximity to the Modiolus for the Cochlear CI532 Slim Modiolar Electrode Array on Evoked Compound Action Potentials and Programming Levels.
    Greisiger R; Heldahl MG; Myhrum M; Sørensen TM; Dammerud JJ; Rasmussen K; Korslund H; Bunne M; Jablonski GE
    Audiol Neurootol; 2022; 27(5):397-405. PubMed ID: 35504247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Challenging aspects of contemporary cochlear implant electrode array design.
    Mistrík P; Jolly C; Sieber D; Hochmair I
    World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Dec; 3(4):192-199. PubMed ID: 29780962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Delayed changes in auditory status in cochlear implant users with preserved acoustic hearing.
    Scheperle RA; Tejani VD; Omtvedt JK; Brown CJ; Abbas PJ; Hansen MR; Gantz BJ; Oleson JJ; Ozanne MV
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():45-57. PubMed ID: 28432874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effect of total intravenous vs volatile anesthetics on intraoperatively acquired electrically evoked compound action potential in children undergoing cochlear implant surgery: A randomized prospective study.
    Alhowary AA; El-Radaideh K; Al-Rusan A; Hani DB; Khraise W; Al Omari A; Alzoubi F
    J Clin Anesth; 2017 Feb; 36():80-83. PubMed ID: 28183580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Hearing preservation outcomes with different cochlear implant electrodes: Nucleus® Hybrid™-L24 and Nucleus Freedom™ CI422.
    Jurawitz MC; Büchner A; Harpel T; Schüssler M; Majdani O; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T
    Audiol Neurootol; 2014; 19(5):293-309. PubMed ID: 25277083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. An overview of cochlear implant electrode array designs.
    Dhanasingh A; Jolly C
    Hear Res; 2017 Dec; 356():93-103. PubMed ID: 29102129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.