These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30653560)

  • 1. Comparison of monocular sensitivities measured with and without occlusion using the head-mounted perimeter imo.
    Wakayama A; Matsumoto C; Ayato Y; Shimomura Y
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210691. PubMed ID: 30653560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual Field Testing with Head-Mounted Perimeter 'imo'.
    Matsumoto C; Yamao S; Nomoto H; Takada S; Okuyama S; Kimura S; Yamanaka K; Aihara M; Shimomura Y
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0161974. PubMed ID: 27564382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of central visual sensitivity between monocular and binocular testing in advanced glaucoma patients using imo perimetry.
    Kumagai T; Shoji T; Yoshikawa Y; Mine I; Kanno J; Ishii H; Saito A; Ishikawa S; Kimura I; Shinoda K
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2020 Nov; 104(11):1258-1534. PubMed ID: 32152139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of Sensitivity Disparity Between the Two Eyes on Pointwise Monocular Sensitivity Under Binocular Viewing in Patients With Glaucoma.
    Wakayama A; Nomoto H; Chiba Y; Matsumoto C; Kusaka S
    J Glaucoma; 2021 Jan; 30(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 33290308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of binocular summation in the peripheral visual field in young and older patients.
    Pardhan S
    Curr Eye Res; 1997 Mar; 16(3):252-5. PubMed ID: 9088742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dynamic visual fields of one-eyed observers.
    Good GW; Fogt N; Daum KM; Mitchell GL
    Optometry; 2005 May; 76(5):285-92. PubMed ID: 15884418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of background complexity on visual sensitivity and binocular summation using patterns with and without noise.
    Wakayama A; Matsumoto C; Ohmure K; Inase M; Shimomura Y
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Jan; 53(1):387-93. PubMed ID: 22167098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Properties of receptive field on binocular fusion stimulation in the central visual field.
    Wakayama A; Matsumoto C; Ohmure K; Matsumoto F; Shimomura Y
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Sep; 240(9):743-7. PubMed ID: 12271372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Effect of stimulus size on binocular summation within the binocular visual field].
    Wakayama A; Matsumoto C; Iwagaki A; Matsumoto F; Ohmure K; Shimomura Y
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2001 Feb; 105(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 11235199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of target size and eccentricity on binocular summation of reaction time in kinetic perimetry.
    Wakayama A; Matsumoto C; Ohmure K; Inase M; Shimomura Y
    Vision Res; 2011 Jan; 51(1):174-8. PubMed ID: 21078335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Binocular summation of detection and resolution thresholds in the central visual field using parallel-line targets.
    Wakayama A; Matsumoto C; Shimomura Y
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Aug; 46(8):2810-5. PubMed ID: 16043854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Regional variations in binocular summation across the visual field.
    Wood JM; Collins MJ; Carkeet A
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1992 Jan; 12(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 1584616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of rates of change between binocular and monocular visual fields.
    Chun YS; Shin JH; Park IK
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Jan; 56(1):451-7. PubMed ID: 25564449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Binocular Interactions in Glaucoma Patients With Nonoverlapping Visual Field Defects: Contrast Summation, Rivalry, and Phase Combination.
    João CAR; Scanferla L; Jansonius NM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2021 Sep; 62(12):9. PubMed ID: 34505864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Comparison between binocular and monocular reading ability and its relation with central visual field sensitivity in glaucoma patients].
    Ishii M; Seki M; Harigai R; Abe H; Fukuchi T
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2013 Nov; 117(11):925-30. PubMed ID: 24397190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Grating and flicker sensitivity in the near and far periphery: naso-temporal asymmetries and binocular summation.
    Grigsby SS; Tsou BH
    Vision Res; 1994 Nov; 34(21):2841-8. PubMed ID: 7975319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Binocular recognition summation in the peripheral visual field: contrast and orientation dependence.
    Pardhan S
    Vision Res; 2003 May; 43(11):1249-55. PubMed ID: 12726831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Decline of monocular contrast sensitivity during binocular fixation].
    Kozawa R; Bingushi K
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2013 Feb; 83(6):536-45. PubMed ID: 23534261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of ocular dominance and visual input on body sway.
    Asakawa K; Ishikawa H; Kawamorita T; Fujiyama Y; Shoji N; Uozato H
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2007; 51(5):375-378. PubMed ID: 17926115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Uniocular and binocular fields of rotation measures: Octopus versus Goldmann.
    Rowe FJ; Hanif S
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2011 Jun; 249(6):909-19. PubMed ID: 21243371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.