These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30654727)

  • 1. The fate of redundant cues in human predictive learning: The outcome ratio effect.
    Uengoer M; Lachnit H; Pearce JM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Aug; 72(8):1945-1960. PubMed ID: 30654727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The fate of redundant cues in human predictive learning.
    Uengoer M; Lotz A; Pearce JM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2013 Oct; 39(4):323-33. PubMed ID: 24000906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The fate of redundant cues during blocking and a simple discrimination.
    Pearce JM; Dopson JC; Haselgrove M; Esber GR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Apr; 38(2):167-79. PubMed ID: 22486755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A test for a difference in the associability of blocked and uninformative cues in human predictive learning.
    Uengoer M; Dwyer DM; Koenig S; Pearce JM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Feb; 72(2):222-237. PubMed ID: 28649906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of common elements in the redundancy effect.
    Uengoer M; Lachnit H; Pearce JM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Jul; 46(3):286-296. PubMed ID: 32730082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The fate of redundant cues: Further analysis of the redundancy effect.
    Jones PM; Pearce JM
    Learn Behav; 2015 Mar; 43(1):72-82. PubMed ID: 25537840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Superior discrimination between similar stimuli after simultaneous exposure.
    Mundy ME; Honey RC; Dwyer DM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jan; 62(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 18720275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Extracting functional equivalence from reversing contingencies.
    Liljeholm M; Balleine BW
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2010 Apr; 36(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 20384397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cue competition influences biconditional discrimination.
    Byrom NC; Murphy RA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Feb; 72(2):182-192. PubMed ID: 28764580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The redundancy effect in human causal learning: No evidence for changes in selective attention.
    Jones PM; Zaksaite T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Aug; 71(8):1748-1760. PubMed ID: 28695765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Changes in attention to an irrelevant cue that accompanies a negative patterning [corrected] discrimination.
    Dopson JC; Esber GR; Pearce JM
    Learn Behav; 2011 Dec; 39(4):336-49. PubMed ID: 21499985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Testing the automaticity of an attentional bias towards predictive cues in human associative learning.
    Luque D; Molinero S; Jevtović M; Beesley T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 May; 73(5):762-780. PubMed ID: 31826714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the representation of novel stimuli in patterning and irrelevant cue discriminations.
    Whitlow JW
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2018 Jul; 44(3):322-339. PubMed ID: 29847984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of prediction error on overt attention and learning in humans.
    Torrents-Rodas D; Koenig S; Uengoer M; Lachnit H
    Behav Processes; 2023 Mar; 206():104843. PubMed ID: 36758733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transfer of associability and relational structure in human associative learning.
    Livesey EJ; Don HJ; Uengoer M; Thorwart A
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(2):125-142. PubMed ID: 30816735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of an ambiguous-feature discrimination.
    Haselgrove M; Robinson J; Nelson A; Pearce JM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Nov; 61(11):1710-25. PubMed ID: 18942036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Learned changes in outcome associability.
    Quigley MC; Eatherington CJ; Haselgrove M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Feb; 72(2):209-221. PubMed ID: 28627301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Summation effects in human learning: evidence from patterning discriminations in goal-tracking.
    Thorwart A; Uengoer M; Livesey EJ; Harris JA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Jul; 70(7):1366-1379. PubMed ID: 27126385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Previously acquired cue-outcome structural knowledge guides new learning: Evidence from the retroactive-interference-between-cues effect.
    Luque D; Morís J; López FJ; Cobos PL
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Aug; 45(6):916-931. PubMed ID: 28405958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The redundancy effect is related to a lack of conditioned inhibition: Evidence from a task in which excitation and inhibition are symmetrical.
    Zaksaite T; Jones PM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Feb; 73(2):260-278. PubMed ID: 31498020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.