These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
684 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30654888)
1. Comparison of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography, Fractional Flow Reserve, and Perfusion Imaging for Ischemia Diagnosis. Driessen RS; Danad I; Stuijfzand WJ; Raijmakers PG; Schumacher SP; van Diemen PA; Leipsic JA; Knuuti J; Underwood SR; van de Ven PM; van Rossum AC; Taylor CA; Knaapen P J Am Coll Cardiol; 2019 Jan; 73(2):161-173. PubMed ID: 30654888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Non-invasive CT-derived fractional flow reserve and static rest and stress CT myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of haemodynamically significant coronary stenosis. Ko BS; Linde JJ; Ihdayhid AR; Norgaard BL; Kofoed KF; Sørgaard M; Adams D; Crossett M; Cameron JD; Seneviratne SK Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Nov; 35(11):2103-2112. PubMed ID: 31273632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The diagnostic performance of SPECT-MPI to predict functional significant coronary artery disease by fractional flow reserve derived from CCTA (FFR Nakanishi R; Osawa K; Ceponiene I; Huth G; Cole J; Kim M; Nezarat N; Rahmani S; Li D; Gupta S; Rogers C; Dailing C; Budoff MJ Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Dec; 33(12):2067-2072. PubMed ID: 28699019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic accuracy and discrimination of ischemia by fractional flow reserve CT using a clinical use rule: results from the Determination of Fractional Flow Reserve by Anatomic Computed Tomographic Angiography study. Thompson AG; Raju R; Blanke P; Yang TH; Mancini GB; Budoff MJ; Norgaard BL; Min JK; Leipsic JA J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2015; 9(2):120-8. PubMed ID: 25819194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of Coronary Calcification on the Diagnostic Performance of CT Angiography Derived FFR in Coronary Artery Disease: A Substudy of the NXT Trial. Nørgaard BL; Gaur S; Leipsic J; Ito H; Miyoshi T; Park SJ; Zvaigzne L; Tzemos N; Jensen JM; Hansson N; Ko B; Bezerra H; Christiansen EH; Kaltoft A; Lassen JF; Bøtker HE; Achenbach S JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Sep; 8(9):1045-1055. PubMed ID: 26298072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective Comparison of FFR Derived From Coronary CT Angiography With SPECT Perfusion Imaging in Stable Coronary Artery Disease: The ReASSESS Study. Sand NPR; Veien KT; Nielsen SS; Nørgaard BL; Larsen P; Johansen A; Hess S; Deibjerg L; Husain M; Junker A; Thomsen KK; Rohold A; Jensen LO JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Nov; 11(11):1640-1650. PubMed ID: 29909103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computed tomography angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) for the detection of myocardial ischemia with invasive fractional flow reserve as reference: systematic review and meta-analysis. Zhuang B; Wang S; Zhao S; Lu M Eur Radiol; 2020 Feb; 30(2):712-725. PubMed ID: 31696294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Feasibility and diagnostic performance of fractional flow reserve measurement derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in real clinical practice. Kawaji T; Shiomi H; Morishita H; Morimoto T; Taylor CA; Kanao S; Koizumi K; Kozawa S; Morihiro K; Watanabe H; Tazaki J; Imai M; Saito N; Shizuta S; Ono K; Togashi K; Kimura T Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Feb; 33(2):271-281. PubMed ID: 27718139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development and Validation of a Quantitative Coronary CT Angiography Model for Diagnosis of Vessel-Specific Coronary Ischemia. Nurmohamed NS; Danad I; Jukema RA; de Winter RW; de Groot RJ; Driessen RS; Bom MJ; van Diemen P; Pontone G; Andreini D; Chang HJ; Katz RJ; Stroes ESG; Wang H; Chan C; Crabtree T; Aquino M; Min JK; Earls JP; Bax JJ; Choi AD; Knaapen P; van Rosendael AR; JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2024 Aug; 17(8):894-906. PubMed ID: 38483420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic Performance of CT-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve in Australian Patients Referred for Invasive Coronary Angiography. Chua A; Ihdayhid AR; Linde JJ; Sørgaard M; Cameron JD; Seneviratne SK; Ko BS Heart Lung Circ; 2022 Aug; 31(8):1102-1109. PubMed ID: 35501246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. CT angiography (CTA) and diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve: results from the Determination of Fractional Flow Reserve by Anatomic CTA (DeFACTO) study. Leipsic J; Yang TH; Thompson A; Koo BK; Mancini GB; Taylor C; Budoff MJ; Park HB; Berman DS; Min JK AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 May; 202(5):989-94. PubMed ID: 24758651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. FFR Derived From Coronary CT Angiography in Nonculprit Lesions of Patients With Recent STEMI. Gaur S; Taylor CA; Jensen JM; Bøtker HE; Christiansen EH; Kaltoft AK; Holm NR; Leipsic J; Zarins CK; Achenbach S; Khem S; Wilk A; Bezerra HG; Lassen JF; Nørgaard BL JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Apr; 10(4):424-433. PubMed ID: 27743953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Anatomical and Functional Computed Tomography for Diagnosing Hemodynamically Significant Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis. Celeng C; Leiner T; Maurovich-Horvat P; Merkely B; de Jong P; Dankbaar JW; van Es HW; Ghoshhajra BB; Hoffmann U; Takx RAP JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Jul; 12(7 Pt 2):1316-1325. PubMed ID: 30219398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rationale and design of the PERFECTION (comparison between stress cardiac computed tomography PERfusion versus Fractional flow rEserve measured by Computed Tomography angiography In the evaluation of suspected cOroNary artery disease) prospective study. Pontone G; Andreini D; Guaricci AI; Guglielmo M; Mushtaq S; Baggiano A; Beltrama V; Trabattoni D; Ferrari C; Calligaris G; Teruzzi G; Fabbiocchi F; Lualdi A; Montorsi P; Bartorelli AL; Pepi M J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(4):330-4. PubMed ID: 27050025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic efficacy of fractional flow reserve with coronary angiography in dual-source computed tomography scanner. Xia G; Fan D; Yao X; Guan G; Wang J Acta Cardiol; 2018 Feb; 73(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 28830299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CT Angiography for the Prediction of Hemodynamic Significance in Intermediate and Severe Lesions: Head-to-Head Comparison With Quantitative Coronary Angiography Using Fractional Flow Reserve as the Reference Standard. Budoff MJ; Nakazato R; Mancini GB; Gransar H; Leipsic J; Berman DS; Min JK JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 May; 9(5):559-64. PubMed ID: 26897669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The diagnostic performance of CT-derived fractional flow reserve for evaluation of myocardial ischaemia confirmed by invasive fractional flow reserve: a meta-analysis. Li S; Tang X; Peng L; Luo Y; Dong R; Liu J Clin Radiol; 2015 May; 70(5):476-86. PubMed ID: 25623512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Machine Learning From Quantitative Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Predicts Fractional Flow Reserve-Defined Ischemia and Impaired Myocardial Blood Flow. Lin A; van Diemen PA; Motwani M; McElhinney P; Otaki Y; Han D; Kwan A; Tzolos E; Klein E; Kuronuma K; Grodecki K; Shou B; Rios R; Manral N; Cadet S; Danad I; Driessen RS; Berman DS; Nørgaard BL; Slomka PJ; Knaapen P; Dey D Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2022 Oct; 15(10):e014369. PubMed ID: 36252116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]