395 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30656786)
1. Marginal Discrepancies of Monolithic Zirconia Crowns: The Influence of Preparation Designs and Sintering Techniques.
Ahmed WM; Abdallah MN; McCullagh AP; Wyatt CCL; Troczynski T; Carvalho RM
J Prosthodont; 2019 Mar; 28(3):288-298. PubMed ID: 30656786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dimensional Changes of Yttria-stabilized Zirconia under Different Preparation Designs and Sintering Protocols.
Ahmed WM; Troczynski T; Stojkova BJ; McCullagh AP; Wyatt CC; Carvalho RM
J Prosthodont; 2020 Oct; 29(8):699-706. PubMed ID: 32237048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Marginal adaptation of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM composite crowns using two different finish line preparation designs.
Akbar JH; Petrie CS; Walker MP; Williams K; Eick JD
J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):155-63. PubMed ID: 16681497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the marginal fit of a CAD/CAM zirconia-based ceramic crown system.
Baig MR; Al-Tarakemah Y; Kasim NHA; Omar R
Int J Prosthodont; 2022; 35(3):319–329. PubMed ID: 33616567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Marginal adaptation of zirconium dioxide copings: influence of the CAD/CAM system and the finish line design.
Euán R; Figueras-Álvarez O; Cabratosa-Termes J; Oliver-Parra R
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 24445027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of fabrication stages and cementation on the marginal fit of CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia crowns.
Kale E; Yilmaz B; Seker E; Özcelik TB
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Dec; 118(6):736-741. PubMed ID: 28434679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of marginal fit of Lava CAD/CAM crown-copings with two finish lines.
Re D; Cerutti F; Augusti G; Cerutti A; Augusti D
Int J Esthet Dent; 2014; 9(3):426-35. PubMed ID: 25126621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A micro-computed tomography analysis of internal and marginal fits of fixed partial dentures: Effect of preparation finish line designs on monolithic zirconia and heat-pressed zirconia-reinforced lithium disilicate.
Elsherbini M; Sakrana AA; Amin RA; Diaa M; Özcan M; Al-Zordk W
J Prosthodont; 2023 Jun; 32(5):90-99. PubMed ID: 36718906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital assessment of marginal accuracy in ceramic crowns fabricated with different marginal finish line configurations.
Faruqi S; Ganji KK; Bandela V; Nagarajappa AK; Mohamed RN; Ahmed MA; Farhan M; Alwakid WN; Al-Hammad KAS; Alam MK
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Jul; 34(5):789-795. PubMed ID: 34668306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Marginal and internal discrepancies of zirconia copings: effects of milling system and finish line design.
Ribeiro IL; Campos F; Sousa RS; Alves ML; Rodrigues DM; Souza RO; Bottino MA
Indian J Dent Res; 2015; 26(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 25961609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An In Vitro Comparison of Zirconia and Hybrid Ceramic Crowns With Heavy Chamfer and Shoulder Finish Lines.
Yadav P; Sharma V; Paliwal J; Meena KK; Madaan R; Gurjar B
Cureus; 2023 Jan; 15(1):e33940. PubMed ID: 36819334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of cement space on the marginal fit of CAD-CAM-fabricated monolithic zirconia crowns.
Kale E; Seker E; Yilmaz B; Özcelik TB
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Dec; 116(6):890-895. PubMed ID: 27460314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of cervical finish line type on the marginal adaptation of zirconia ceramic crowns.
Comlekoglu M; Dundar M; Ozcan M; Gungor M; Gokce B; Artunc C
Oper Dent; 2009; 34(5):586-92. PubMed ID: 19830974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of Marginal and Internal Fit of a CAD/CAM Monolithic Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate Porcelain Laminate Veneer System.
Baig MR; Akbar AA; Sabti MY; Behbehani Z
J Prosthodont; 2022 Jul; 31(6):502-511. PubMed ID: 34608712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the marginal adaptation of zirconium dioxide crowns in preparations with two different finish lines.
Euán R; Figueras-Álvarez O; Cabratosa-Termes J; Brufau-de Barberà M; Gomes-Azevedo S
J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):291-5. PubMed ID: 22372886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the Accuracy of Fit of Metal, Zirconia, and Lithium Disilicate Crowns Made from Different Manufacturing Techniques.
Al Hamad KQ; Al Quran FA; AlJalam SA; Baba NZ
J Prosthodont; 2019 Jun; 28(5):497-503. PubMed ID: 30719780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An In Vivo Evaluation of the Fit of Zirconium-Oxide Based, Ceramic Single Crowns with Vertical and Horizontal Finish Line Preparations.
Vigolo P; Mutinelli S; Biscaro L; Stellini E
J Prosthodont; 2015 Dec; 24(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 26359654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of production method on surface roughness, marginal and internal fit, and retention of cobalt-chromium single crowns.
Lövgren N; Roxner R; Klemendz S; Larsson C
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 28024818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of lithium disilicate CAD-CAM crowns with different finish lines by using a micro-CT technique.
Rizonaki M; Jacquet W; Bottenberg P; Depla L; Boone M; De Coster PJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jun; 127(6):890-898. PubMed ID: 33541816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Marginal Fit of Full Contour Monolithic Zirconia in Different Thicknesses and Layered Zirconia Crowns.
Mohaghegh M; Firouzmandi M; Ansarifard E; Ramazani L
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2020; 10(5):652-658. PubMed ID: 33282776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
