395 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30656786)
21. Fit of tooth-supported zirconia single crowns-A systematic review of the literature.
Ahmed WM; Shariati B; Gazzaz AZ; Sayed ME; Carvalho RM
Clin Exp Dent Res; 2020 Dec; 6(6):700-716. PubMed ID: 32885613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A Novel Full-Digital Protocol (SCAN-PLAN-MAKE-DONE
Mangano F; Margiani B; Admakin O
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Jan; 16(3):. PubMed ID: 30678357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Marginal fit of CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated by using cone beam computed tomography scans.
Kale E; Cilli M; Özçelik TB; Yilmaz B
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 May; 123(5):731-737. PubMed ID: 31653403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Marginal and internal discrepancies related to margin design of ceramic crowns fabricated by a CAD/CAM system.
Souza RO; Özcan M; Pavanelli CA; Buso L; Lombardo GH; Michida SM; Mesquita AM; Bottino MA
J Prosthodont; 2012 Feb; 21(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 22050205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Marginal fit of monolithic versus layered zirconia crowns assessed with 2 marginal gap methods.
Fasih P; Tavakolizadeh S; Sedaghat Monfared M; Sofi-Mahmudi A; Yari A
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Aug; 130(2):250.e1-250.e7. PubMed ID: 37451899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Fitting accuracy of zirconia single crowns produced via digital and conventional impressions-a clinical comparative study.
Rödiger M; Heinitz A; Bürgers R; Rinke S
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Mar; 21(2):579-587. PubMed ID: 27469102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Full-arch prostheses from translucent zirconia: accuracy of fit.
Sachs C; Groesser J; Stadelmann M; Schweiger J; Erdelt K; Beuer F
Dent Mater; 2014 Aug; 30(8):817-23. PubMed ID: 24933230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. In vitro evaluation of marginal discrepancy of monolithic zirconia restorations fabricated with different CAD-CAM systems.
Hamza TA; Sherif RM
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jun; 117(6):762-766. PubMed ID: 27836145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Influence of milling systems and marginal configurations on the fit of yttrium stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystals (Y-TZP)' copings.
Al-Aali KA; Bin-Shuwaish MS; Alhenaki AM; Al Ahdal K; Al Deeb L; Maawadh AM; AlHelal A; Alshehri H; Vohra F; Abduljabbar T
J Appl Biomater Funct Mater; 2020; 18():2280800020924514. PubMed ID: 33356766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Marginal and Internal Fit of CAD/CAM Crowns Fabricated Over Reverse Tapered Preparations.
Carbajal Mejía JB; Yatani H; Wakabayashi K; Nakamura T
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e477-e484. PubMed ID: 29194841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effect of different finish line preparations on the marginal and internal adaptation of cobalt-chromium metal alloy copings fabricated by using CAD-CAM technology: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Shah N; Badwaik P; Sheth VH; Bhatnagar V; Bhanushali N; Patil P
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 May; 127(5):716-728.e6. PubMed ID: 34716012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Marginal discrepancy of monolithic and veneered all-ceramic crowns on titanium and zirconia implant abutments before and after adhesive cementation: a scanning electron microscopy analysis.
Martinez-Rus F; Ferreiroa A; Ozcan M; Pradies G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):480-7. PubMed ID: 23527350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The effect of porcelain firing and type of finish line on the marginal fit of zirconia copings.
Vojdani M; Safari A; Mohaghegh M; Pardis S; Mahdavi F
J Dent (Shiraz); 2015 Jun; 16(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 26046107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of the crown preparation margin and die type on the marginal accuracy of fiber-reinforced composite crowns.
Ayad MF
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Feb; 9(2):9-16. PubMed ID: 18264520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of 3-unit zirconia frameworks fabricated with CAD-CAM technology using direct and indirect digital scans.
Arezoobakhsh A; Shayegh SS; Jamali Ghomi A; Hakimaneh SMR
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):105-112. PubMed ID: 30982618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of loupes versus microscope-enhanced CAD-CAM crown preparations: A microcomputed tomography analysis of marginal gaps.
Atlas AM; Janyavula S; Elsabee R; Alper E; Isleem WF; Bergler M; Setzer FC
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr; 131(4):643-651. PubMed ID: 35643825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Three-dimensional fit of self-glazed zirconia monolithic crowns fabricated by wet deposition.
Li Y; Zhao J; Sun Z; Lin N; Zheng Y
Dent Mater J; 2022 May; 41(3):363-367. PubMed ID: 35095041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The effect of veneering on the marginal fit of CAD/CAM-generated, copy-milled, and cast metal copings.
Ates SM; Yesil Duymus Z; Caglar I; Hologlu B
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Nov; 21(8):2553-2560. PubMed ID: 28091875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology.
Batson ER; Cooper LF; Duqum I; Mendonça G
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):770-7. PubMed ID: 24980739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effect of multiple firings on the marginal fit of monolithic zirconia crowns: An in vitro study.
Yang S; Li Q; Chen SY; Yu H
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Dec; 130(6):897-901. PubMed ID: 35181056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
