314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30657564)
21. Automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) in assessing breast cancer size: A comparison with conventional ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging.
Girometti R; Zanotel M; Londero V; Linda A; Lorenzon M; Zuiani C
Eur Radiol; 2018 Mar; 28(3):1000-1008. PubMed ID: 29018952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of handheld ultrasound and automated breast ultrasound in women recalled after mammography screening.
Hellgren R; Dickman P; Leifland K; Saracco A; Hall P; Celebioglu F
Acta Radiol; 2017 May; 58(5):515-520. PubMed ID: 27565633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A Prospective Comparative Evaluation of Handheld Ultrasound Examination (HHUS) or Automated Ultrasound Examination (ABVS) in Women with Dense Breast.
Brunetti N; De Giorgis S; Tosto S; Garlaschi A; Rescinito G; Massa B; Calabrese M; Tagliafico AS
Diagnostics (Basel); 2022 Sep; 12(9):. PubMed ID: 36140571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of an automated breast 3D-ultrasound system by comparing it with hand-held ultrasound (HHUS) and mammography.
Golatta M; Baggs C; Schweitzer-Martin M; Domschke C; Schott S; Harcos A; Scharf A; Junkermann H; Rauch G; Rom J; Sohn C; Heil J
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Apr; 291(4):889-95. PubMed ID: 25311201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison between automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) versus hand-held ultrasound as a second look procedure after magnetic resonance imaging.
Girometti R; Zanotel M; Londero V; Bazzocchi M; Zuiani C
Eur Radiol; 2017 Sep; 27(9):3767-3775. PubMed ID: 28120030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The assessment of breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography.
Park JS; Moon WK; Lyou CY; Cho N; Kang KW; Chung JK
Acta Radiol; 2011 Feb; 52(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 21498321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A novel application of the Automated Breast Volume Scanner (ABVS) in the diagnosis of soft tissue tumors.
Chen T; Gao H; Guo W; Qing X; Gao K; Yu J; Deng Y
Clin Imaging; 2015; 39(3):401-7. PubMed ID: 25667066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of Diagnostic Performance of Automatic Breast Volume Scanner Compared to Handheld Ultrasound on Different Breast Lesions: A Systematic Review.
Ibraheem SA; Mahmud R; Mohamad Saini S; Abu Hassan H; Keiteb AS; Dirie AM
Diagnostics (Basel); 2022 Feb; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 35204629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Combined use of the automated breast volume scanner and the US elastography for the differentiation of benign from malignant lesions of the breast.
Xu C; Wei S; Xie Y; Guan X; Fu N; Huang P; Yang B
BMC Cancer; 2014 Nov; 14():798. PubMed ID: 25366878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Digital breast tomosynthesis plus mammography, magnetic resonance imaging plus mammography and mammography alone: A comparison of diagnostic performance in symptomatic women.
Tang W; Hu FX; Zhu H; Wang QF; Gu YJ; Peng WJ
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2017; 66(2):105-116. PubMed ID: 28211806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Agreement Between an Automated Volume Breast Scanner and Handheld Ultrasound for Diagnostic Breast Examinations.
Barr RG; DeVita R; Destounis S; Manzoni F; De Silvestri A; Tinelli C
J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Oct; 36(10):2087-2092. PubMed ID: 28569407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Diagnostic value of an automated breast volume scanner compared with a hand-held ultrasound: a meta-analysis.
Zhang X; Chen J; Zhou Y; Mao F; Lin Y; Shen S; Sun Q; Ouyang Z
Gland Surg; 2019 Dec; 8(6):698-711. PubMed ID: 32042678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Diagnostic performance and inter-observer concordance in lesion detection with the automated breast volume scanner (ABVS).
Wojcinski S; Gyapong S; Farrokh A; Soergel P; Hillemanns P; Degenhardt F
BMC Med Imaging; 2013 Nov; 13():36. PubMed ID: 24219312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Is there an extraclinical value of automated breast volume scanner compared with hand-held ultrasound?: A pilot study.
Zhan J; Diao XH; Pang Y; Wang Y; Chen L; Chen Y
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Sep; 96(37):e7765. PubMed ID: 28906361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging aids the surgical management of invasive lobular breast cancer.
Kneeshaw PJ; Turnbull LW; Smith A; Drew PJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2003 Feb; 29(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 12559074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Diagnostic Performance of Automated Breast Ultrasound in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Breast Masses in Asymptomatic Women: A Comparison Study With Handheld Ultrasound.
Niu L; Bao L; Zhu L; Tan Y; Xu X; Shan Y; Liu J; Zhu Q; Jiang C; Shen Y
J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Nov; 38(11):2871-2880. PubMed ID: 30912178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of the Tumor Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients: Correlation Between Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Pathologic Tumor Cellularity.
Choi WJ; Kim WK; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Chae EY; Kim HH
Clin Breast Cancer; 2018 Feb; 18(1):e115-e121. PubMed ID: 28890184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Utility and Diagnostic Performance of Automated Breast Ultrasound System in Evaluating Pure Non-Mass Enhancement on Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Kwon BR; Chang JM; Kim SY; Lee SH; Shin SU; Yi A; Cho N; Moon WK
Korean J Radiol; 2020 Nov; 21(11):1210-1219. PubMed ID: 32729267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A new algorithm for automatic vascular mapping of DCE-MRI of the breast: Clinical application of a potential new biomarker.
Vignati A; Giannini V; Carbonaro LA; Bertotto I; Martincich L; Sardanelli F; Regge D
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014 Dec; 117(3):482-8. PubMed ID: 25262335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
