These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

363 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30657711)

  • 41. Driver Vigilance in Automated Vehicles: Hazard Detection Failures Are a Matter of Time.
    Greenlee ET; DeLucia PR; Newton DC
    Hum Factors; 2018 Jun; 60(4):465-476. PubMed ID: 29513611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. How Does Approaching a Lead Vehicle and Monitoring Request Affect Drivers' Takeover Performance? A Simulated Driving Study with Functional MRI.
    Li C; Li X; Lv M; Chen F; Ma X; Zhang L
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Dec; 19(1):. PubMed ID: 35010671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Get Ready for Take-Overs: Using Head-Up Display for Drivers to Engage in Non-Driving-Related Tasks in Automated Vehicles.
    Li X; Schroeter R; Rakotonirainy A; Kuo J; Lenné MG
    Hum Factors; 2023 Dec; 65(8):1759-1775. PubMed ID: 34865560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The monitoring requests on young driver's fatigue and take-over performance in prolonged conditional automated driving.
    Yin J; Shao H; Zhang X
    J Safety Res; 2024 Feb; 88():285-292. PubMed ID: 38485370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. What determines the take-over time? An integrated model approach of driver take-over after automated driving.
    Zeeb K; Buchner A; Schrauf M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 May; 78():212-221. PubMed ID: 25794922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The effects of takeover request modalities on highly automated car control transitions.
    Yoon SH; Kim YW; Ji YG
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Feb; 123():150-158. PubMed ID: 30503824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Enhancing safety in conditionally automated driving: Can more takeover request visual information make a difference in hazard scenarios with varied hazard visibility?
    Huang WC; Fan LH; Han ZJ; Niu YF
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Sep; 205():107687. PubMed ID: 38943983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Modeling takeover time based on non-driving-related task attributes in highly automated driving.
    Yoon SH; Lee SC; Ji YG
    Appl Ergon; 2021 Apr; 92():103343. PubMed ID: 33348112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. How we can measure the non-driving-task engagement in automated driving: Comparing flow experience and workload.
    Ko SM; Ji YG
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Feb; 67():237-245. PubMed ID: 29122195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A Bayesian Regression Analysis of the Effects of Alert Presence and Scenario Criticality on Automated Vehicle Takeover Performance.
    Alambeigi H; McDonald AD
    Hum Factors; 2023 Mar; 65(2):288-305. PubMed ID: 33908795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Modeling takeover behavior in level 3 automated driving via a structural equation model: Considering the mediating role of trust.
    Jin M; Lu G; Chen F; Shi X; Tan H; Zhai J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jul; 157():106156. PubMed ID: 33957474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Fatal crash between a car operating with automated control systems and a tractor-semitrailer truck.
    Poland K; McKay MP; Bruce D; Becic E
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S153-S156. PubMed ID: 30841795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Takeover Time in Highly Automated Vehicles: Noncritical Transitions to and From Manual Control.
    Eriksson A; Stanton NA
    Hum Factors; 2017 Jun; 59(4):689-705. PubMed ID: 28124573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Getting back in the loop: Does autonomous driving duration affect driver's takeover performance?
    Portron A; Perrotte G; Ollier G; Bougard C; Bourdin C; Vercher JL
    Heliyon; 2024 Feb; 10(3):e24112. PubMed ID: 38317989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Speech-based takeover requests in conditionally automated driving: Effects of different voices on the driver takeover performance.
    Wang Y; Zhang W; Zhou R
    Appl Ergon; 2022 May; 101():103695. PubMed ID: 35091271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effective cues for accelerating young drivers' time to transfer control following a period of conditional automation.
    Wright TJ; Agrawal R; Samuel S; Wang Y; Zilberstein S; Fisher DL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jul; 116():14-20. PubMed ID: 29031513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Driver Vigilance in Automated Vehicles: Effects of Demands on Hazard Detection Performance.
    Greenlee ET; DeLucia PR; Newton DC
    Hum Factors; 2019 May; 61(3):474-487. PubMed ID: 30307760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Impact of duration of monitoring before takeover request on takeover time with insights into eye tracking data.
    Huang C; Yang B; Nakano K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Jun; 185():107018. PubMed ID: 36924623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Exploring driving anger-caused impairment of takeover performance among professional taxi drivers during partially automated driving.
    Pan H; Payre W; Gao Z; Wang Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Sep; 205():107686. PubMed ID: 38909484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The relationship between cell phone use and management of driver fatigue: It's complicated.
    Saxby DJ; Matthews G; Neubauer C
    J Safety Res; 2017 Jun; 61():129-140. PubMed ID: 28454858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.