These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30658574)

  • 1. Clinical results of bioresorbable drug-eluting scaffolds in short and long coronary artery lesions using the PSP technique.
    Reichart C; Wöhrle J; Markovic S; Rottbauer W; Seeger J
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2019 Jan; 19(1):22. PubMed ID: 30658574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds in patients with coronary artery disease: results from the German-Austrian ABSORB RegIstRy (GABI-R).
    Nef HM; Wiebe J; Kastner J; Mehilli J; Muenzel T; Naber C; Neumann T; Richardt G; Schmermund A; Woehrle J; Zahn R; Riemer T; Achenbach S; Hamm CW
    EuroIntervention; 2017 Dec; 13(11):1311-1318. PubMed ID: 28829745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical restenosis and its predictors after implantation of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: results from GABI-R.
    Mehilli J; Achenbach S; Woehrle J; Baquet M; Riemer T; Muenzel T; Nef H; Naber C; Richardt G; Zahn R; Gori T; Neumann T; Kastner J; Schmermund A; Hamm C
    EuroIntervention; 2017 Dec; 13(11):1319-1326. PubMed ID: 28649953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Versus Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stents: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.
    Mahmoud AN; Barakat AF; Elgendy AY; Schneibel E; Mentias A; Abuzaid A; Elgendy IY
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 May; 10(5):. PubMed ID: 28468954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus everolimus-eluting stents or drug eluting balloon for the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis: 1-Year follow-up of a propensity score matching comparison (the BIORESOLVE-ISR Study).
    Moscarella E; Tanaka A; Ielasi A; Cortese B; Coscarelli S; De Angelis MC; Piraino D; Latib A; Grigis G; Bianchi R; Buccheri D; Calabrò P; Tespili M; Silva Orrego P; Colombo A; Varricchio A
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Oct; 92(4):668-677. PubMed ID: 29356269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bioresorbable Everolimus-Eluting Vascular Scaffold for Long Coronary Lesions: A Subanalysis of the International, Multicenter GHOST-EU Registry.
    Geraci S; Kawamoto H; Caramanno G; Ruparelia N; Capodanno D; Brugaletta S; Gori T; Nef H; Sabate M; Mehilli J; Lesiak M; Naber C; Di Mario C; Capranzano P; Wiebe J; Araszkiewicz A; Pyxaras S; Mattesini A; Münzel T; Tamburino C; Colombo A; Latib A
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Mar; 10(6):560-568. PubMed ID: 28259663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus everolimus-eluting metallic stent in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: 1-year results of a propensity score matching comparison: the BVS-EXAMINATION Study (bioresorbable vascular scaffold-a clinical evaluation of everolimus eluting coronary stents in the treatment of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction).
    Brugaletta S; Gori T; Low AF; Tousek P; Pinar E; Gomez-Lara J; Scalone G; Schulz E; Chan MY; Kocka V; Hurtado J; Gomez-Hospital JA; Münzel T; Lee CH; Cequier A; Valdés M; Widimsky P; Serruys PW; Sabaté M
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jan; 8(1 Pt B):189-197. PubMed ID: 25616924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Impact of Post-Procedural Asymmetry, Expansion, and Eccentricity of Bioresorbable Everolimus-Eluting Scaffold and Metallic Everolimus-Eluting Stent on Clinical Outcomes in the ABSORB II Trial.
    Suwannasom P; Sotomi Y; Ishibashi Y; Cavalcante R; Albuquerque FN; Macaya C; Ormiston JA; Hill J; Lang IM; Egred M; Fajadet J; Lesiak M; Tijssen JG; Wykrzykowska JJ; de Winter RJ; Chevalier B; Serruys PW; Onuma Y
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jun; 9(12):1231-1242. PubMed ID: 27262861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mid- to Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Patients Treated With the Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold: The BVS Expand Registry.
    Felix CM; Fam JM; Diletti R; Ishibashi Y; Karanasos A; Everaert BR; van Mieghem NM; Daemen J; de Jaegere PP; Zijlstra F; Regar ES; Onuma Y; van Geuns RJ
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Aug; 9(16):1652-63. PubMed ID: 27476094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-Term Outcomes of Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold vs. Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stent　- A Randomized Comparison Through 5 Years in Japan.
    Kozuma K; Tanabe K; Hamazaki Y; Okamura T; Ando J; Ikari Y; Nakagawa Y; Kusano H; Ediebah D; Kimura T;
    Circ J; 2020 Apr; 84(5):733-741. PubMed ID: 32213737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Absorb Bioresorbable Scaffold Versus Xience Metallic Stent for Prevention of Restenosis Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients at High Risk of Restenosis: Rationale and Design of the COMPARE ABSORB Trial.
    Chang CC; Onuma Y; Achenbach S; Barbato E; Chevalier B; Cook S; Dudek D; Escaned J; Gori T; Kočka V; Tarantini G; West NEJ; Morice MC; Tijssen JGP; van Geuns RJ; Smits PC;
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2019 Jul; 20(7):577-582. PubMed ID: 31153846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 1-year clinical outcomes of diabetic patients treated with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: a pooled analysis of the ABSORB and the SPIRIT trials.
    Muramatsu T; Onuma Y; van Geuns RJ; Chevalier B; Patel TM; Seth A; Diletti R; García-García HM; Dorange CC; Veldhof S; Cheong WF; Ozaki Y; Whitbourn R; Bartorelli A; Stone GW; Abizaid A; Serruys PW; ; ; ; ; ;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 May; 7(5):482-93. PubMed ID: 24746650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 1-Year Outcomes of Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stents: A Propensity-Matched Comparison of the GHOST-EU and XIENCE V USA Registries.
    Tamburino C; Capranzano P; Gori T; Latib A; Lesiak M; Nef H; Caramanno G; Naber C; Mehilli J; Di Mario C; Sabaté M; Münzel T; Colombo A; Araszkiewicz A; Wiebe J; Geraci S; Jensen C; Mattesini A; Brugaletta S; Capodanno D
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Mar; 9(5):440-9. PubMed ID: 26875648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical results of single and multiple bioresorbable drug-eluting scaffolds for treatment of de-novo coronary artery disease.
    Markovic S; Dragomir S; Walcher D; Bernhardt P; Imhof A; Rottbauer W; Wöhrle J
    Coron Artery Dis; 2016 Nov; 27(7):561-5. PubMed ID: 27244371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold vs. everolimus-eluting metallic stent in small vessel disease: A propensity matched analysis of COMPARE II, RAI, and MAASSTAD-ABSORB studies.
    Tarantini G; Masiero G; Barioli A; Paradies V; Vlachojannis G; Tellaroli P; Cortese B; di Palma G; Varricchio A; Ielasi A; Loi B; Steffenino G; Ueshima D; Mojoli M; Smits P
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Aug; 92(2):E115-E124. PubMed ID: 29513403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A prospective evaluation of a standardized strategy for the use of a polymeric everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Rationale and design of the BVS STEMI STRATEGY-IT study.
    Ielasi A; Varricchio A; Campo G; Leoncini M; Cortese B; Vicinelli P; Brugaletta S; di Uccio FS; Latib A; Tespili M
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Jun; 89(7):1129-1138. PubMed ID: 27774758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of early clinical outcomes between ABSORB bioresorbable vascular scaffold and everolimus-eluting stent implantation in a real-world population.
    Costopoulos C; Latib A; Naganuma T; Miyazaki T; Sato K; Figini F; Sticchi A; Carlino M; Chieffo A; Montorfano M; Colombo A
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jan; 85(1):E10-5. PubMed ID: 24909303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Everolimus- Versus Novolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds for the Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease: A Matched Comparison.
    Wiebe J; Dörr O; Ilstad H; Husser O; Liebetrau C; Boeder N; Bauer T; Möllmann H; Kastrati A; Hamm CW; Nef HM
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Mar; 10(5):477-485. PubMed ID: 28216214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Risk and timing of clinical events according to diabetic status of patients treated with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds versus everolimus-eluting stent: 2-year results from a propensity score matched comparison of ABSORB EXTEND and SPIRIT trials.
    Campos CM; Caixeta A; Franken M; Bartorelli AL; Whitbourn RJ; Wu CJ; Li Paul Kao H; Rosli MA; Carrie D; De Bruyne B; Stone GW; Serruys PW; Abizaid A;
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Feb; 91(3):387-395. PubMed ID: 28471086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds for treatment of coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes mellitus: the midterm follow-up of the prospective ABSORB DM Benelux study.
    Hommels TM; Hermanides RS; Rasoul S; Berta B; IJsselmuiden AJJ; Jessurun GAJ; Benit E; Pereira B; De Luca G; Kedhi E
    Cardiovasc Diabetol; 2019 Mar; 18(1):25. PubMed ID: 30851731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.