415 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30658933)
1. Performance of human papillomavirus testing on self-collected versus clinician-collected samples for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 or worse: a randomised, paired screen-positive, non-inferiority trial.
Polman NJ; Ebisch RMF; Heideman DAM; Melchers WJG; Bekkers RLM; Molijn AC; Meijer CJLM; Quint WGV; Snijders PJF; Massuger LFAG; van Kemenade FJ; Berkhof J
Lancet Oncol; 2019 Feb; 20(2):229-238. PubMed ID: 30658933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of human papillomavirus testing on self-collected versus clinician-collected samples: a meta-analysis.
Arbyn M; Verdoodt F; Snijders PJ; Verhoef VM; Suonio E; Dillner L; Minozzi S; Bellisario C; Banzi R; Zhao FH; Hillemanns P; Anttila A
Lancet Oncol; 2014 Feb; 15(2):172-83. PubMed ID: 24433684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Human papillomavirus testing for the detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer: final results of the POBASCAM randomised controlled trial.
Rijkaart DC; Berkhof J; Rozendaal L; van Kemenade FJ; Bulkmans NW; Heideman DA; Kenter GG; Cuzick J; Snijders PJ; Meijer CJ
Lancet Oncol; 2012 Jan; 13(1):78-88. PubMed ID: 22177579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Triage by methylation-marker testing versus cytology in women who test HPV-positive on self-collected cervicovaginal specimens (PROHTECT-3): a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial.
Verhoef VM; Bosgraaf RP; van Kemenade FJ; Rozendaal L; Heideman DA; Hesselink AT; Bekkers RL; Steenbergen RD; Massuger LF; Melchers WJ; Bulten J; Overbeek LI; Berkhof J; Snijders PJ; Meijer CJ
Lancet Oncol; 2014 Mar; 15(3):315-22. PubMed ID: 24529697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. High-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in human papillomavirus self-sampling of screening non-attenders.
Lam JUH; Elfström KM; Ejegod DM; Pedersen H; Rygaard C; Rebolj M; Lynge E; Juul KE; Kjær SK; Dillner J; Bonde J
Br J Cancer; 2018 Jan; 118(1):138-144. PubMed ID: 29136403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical performance of high-risk HPV testing on self-samples versus clinician samples in routine primary HPV screening in the Netherlands: An observational study.
Inturrisi F; Aitken CA; Melchers WJG; van den Brule AJC; Molijn A; Hinrichs JWJ; Niesters HGM; Siebers AG; Schuurman R; Heideman DAM; de Kok IMCM; Bekkers RLM; van Kemenade FJ; Berkhof J
Lancet Reg Health Eur; 2021 Dec; 11():100235. PubMed ID: 34918001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. HPV testing in first-void urine provides sensitivity for CIN2+ detection comparable with a smear taken by a clinician or a brush-based self-sample: cross-sectional data from a triage population.
Leeman A; Del Pino M; Molijn A; Rodriguez A; Torné A; de Koning M; Ordi J; van Kemenade F; Jenkins D; Quint W
BJOG; 2017 Aug; 124(9):1356-1363. PubMed ID: 28391609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance of carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and HPV16 or HPV18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening of women aged 25 years and older: a subanalysis of the ATHENA study.
Castle PE; Stoler MH; Wright TC; Sharma A; Wright TL; Behrens CM
Lancet Oncol; 2011 Sep; 12(9):880-90. PubMed ID: 21865084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictive Value of HPV Testing in Self-collected and Clinician-Collected Samples Compared with Cytology in Detecting High-grade Cervical Lesions.
El-Zein M; Bouten S; Louvanto K; Gilbert L; Gotlieb WH; Hemmings R; Behr MA; Franco EL;
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2019 Jul; 28(7):1134-1140. PubMed ID: 31015201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. HPV testing on self collected cervicovaginal lavage specimens as screening method for women who do not attend cervical screening: cohort study.
Gök M; Heideman DA; van Kemenade FJ; Berkhof J; Rozendaal L; Spruyt JW; Voorhorst F; Beliën JA; Babovic M; Snijders PJ; Meijer CJ
BMJ; 2010 Mar; 340():c1040. PubMed ID: 20223872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy and effectiveness of HPV mRNA testing in cervical cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Arbyn M; Simon M; de Sanjosé S; Clarke MA; Poljak M; Rezhake R; Berkhof J; Nyaga V; Gultekin M; Canfell K; Wentzensen N
Lancet Oncol; 2022 Jul; 23(7):950-960. PubMed ID: 35709810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficacy of human papillomavirus testing for the detection of invasive cervical cancers and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a randomised controlled trial.
Ronco G; Giorgi-Rossi P; Carozzi F; Confortini M; Dalla Palma P; Del Mistro A; Ghiringhello B; Girlando S; Gillio-Tos A; De Marco L; Naldoni C; Pierotti P; Rizzolo R; Schincaglia P; Zorzi M; Zappa M; Segnan N; Cuzick J;
Lancet Oncol; 2010 Mar; 11(3):249-57. PubMed ID: 20089449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance and Diagnostic Accuracy of Human Papillomavirus Testing on Self-Collected Urine and Vaginal Samples in a Referral Population.
Cho HW; Hong JH; Min KJ; Ouh YT; Seong SJ; Moon JH; Cho SH; Lee JK
Cancer Res Treat; 2021 Jul; 53(3):829-836. PubMed ID: 33421987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pooled analysis of a self-sampling HPV DNA Test as a cervical cancer primary screening method.
Zhao FH; Lewkowitz AK; Chen F; Lin MJ; Hu SY; Zhang X; Pan QJ; Ma JF; Niyazi M; Li CQ; Li SM; Smith JS; Belinson JL; Qiao YL; Castle PE
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2012 Feb; 104(3):178-88. PubMed ID: 22271765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.
C Kitchener H; Canfell K; Gilham C; Sargent A; Roberts C; Desai M; Peto J
Health Technol Assess; 2014 Apr; 18(23):1-196. PubMed ID: 24762804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical Performance of the RealTi
Latsuzbaia A; Vanden Broeck D; Van Keer S; Weyers S; Tjalma WAA; Doyen J; Donders G; De Sutter P; Vorsters A; Peeters E; Arbyn M
Microbiol Spectr; 2022 Oct; 10(5):e0163122. PubMed ID: 36047900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Risk of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia during follow-up in HPV-positive women according to baseline p16-INK4A results: a prospective analysis of a nested substudy of the NTCC randomised controlled trial.
Carozzi F; Gillio-Tos A; Confortini M; Del Mistro A; Sani C; De Marco L; Girlando S; Rosso S; Naldoni C; Dalla Palma P; Zorzi M; Giorgi-Rossi P; Segnan N; Cuzick J; Ronco G;
Lancet Oncol; 2013 Feb; 14(2):168-76. PubMed ID: 23261355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Direct comparison of two vaginal self-sampling devices for the detection of human papillomavirus infections.
Jentschke M; Chen K; Arbyn M; Hertel B; Noskowicz M; Soergel P; Hillemanns P
J Clin Virol; 2016 Sep; 82():46-50. PubMed ID: 27434147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of a new HPV self-sampling device for cervical cancer screening: The Cervical and Self-Sample In Screening (CASSIS) study.
El-Zein M; Bouten S; Louvanto K; Gilbert L; Gotlieb W; Hemmings R; Behr MA; Franco EL;
Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 149(3):491-497. PubMed ID: 29678360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Offering self-sampling for human papillomavirus testing to non-attendees of the cervical screening programme: Characteristics of the responders.
Gök M; Heideman DA; van Kemenade FJ; de Vries AL; Berkhof J; Rozendaal L; Beliën JA; Overbeek L; Babović M; Snijders PJ; Meijer CJ
Eur J Cancer; 2012 Aug; 48(12):1799-808. PubMed ID: 22172570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
