798 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30659616)
1. Design and commissioning of the non-dedicated scanning proton beamline for ocular treatment at the synchrotron-based CNAO facility.
Ciocca M; Magro G; Mastella E; Mairani A; Mirandola A; Molinelli S; Russo S; Vai A; Fiore MR; Mosci C; Valvo F; Via R; Baroni G; Orecchia R
Med Phys; 2019 Apr; 46(4):1852-1862. PubMed ID: 30659616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dosimetric properties of a proton beamline dedicated to the treatment of ocular disease.
Slopsema RL; Mamalui M; Zhao T; Yeung D; Malyapa R; Li Z
Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 41(1):011707. PubMed ID: 24387499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Characterization of the HollandPTC proton therapy beamline dedicated to uveal melanoma treatment and an interinstitutional comparison.
Fleury E; Trnková P; Spruijt K; Herault J; Lebbink F; Heufelder J; Hrbacek J; Horwacik T; Kajdrowicz T; Denker A; Gerard A; Hofverberg P; Mamalui M; Slopsema R; Pignol JP; Hoogeman M
Med Phys; 2021 Aug; 48(8):4506-4522. PubMed ID: 34091930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dosimetric commissioning and quality assurance of scanned ion beams at the Italian National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy.
Mirandola A; Molinelli S; Vilches Freixas G; Mairani A; Gallio E; Panizza D; Russo S; Ciocca M; Donetti M; Magro G; Giordanengo S; Orecchia R
Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 42(9):5287-300. PubMed ID: 26328978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improved lateral penumbra for proton ocular treatments on a general-purpose spot scanning beamline.
Saini J; Maes D; Regmi R; Fung A; Bloch C; Schwarz M; Stacey A; Chen J; Rengan R; Halasz L
Phys Med; 2023 Mar; 107():102551. PubMed ID: 36867911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantifying the effect of air gap, depth, and range shifter thickness on TPS dosimetric accuracy in superficial PBS proton therapy.
Shirey RJ; Wu HT
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 19(1):164-173. PubMed ID: 29239528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimization of a general-purpose, actively scanned proton beamline for ocular treatments: Geant4 simulations.
Piersimoni P; Rimoldi A; Riccardi C; Pirola M; Molinelli S; Ciocca M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Mar; 16(2):5227. PubMed ID: 26103195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Design and characterization of an aperture system and spot configuration for ocular treatments with a gantry-based spot scanning proton beam.
Hickling SV; Corner S; Kruse JJ; Deisher AJ
Med Phys; 2023 Jul; 50(7):4521-4532. PubMed ID: 37084072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Commissioning dose computation models for spot scanning proton beams in water for a commercially available treatment planning system.
Zhu XR; Poenisch F; Lii M; Sawakuchi GO; Titt U; Bues M; Song X; Zhang X; Li Y; Ciangaru G; Li H; Taylor MB; Suzuki K; Mohan R; Gillin MT; Sahoo N
Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041723. PubMed ID: 23556893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Benchmarking a GATE/Geant4 Monte Carlo model for proton beams in magnetic fields.
Padilla-Cabal F; Alejandro Fragoso J; Franz Resch A; Georg D; Fuchs H
Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 47(1):223-233. PubMed ID: 31661559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development and commissioning of a Monte Carlo photon beam model for the forthcoming clinical trials in microbeam radiation therapy.
Martínez-Rovira I; Sempau J; Prezado Y
Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):119-31. PubMed ID: 22225281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development and validation of the Dynamic Collimation Monte Carlo simulation package for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Nelson NP; Culberson WS; Hyer DE; Geoghegan TJ; Patwardhan KA; Smith BR; Flynn RT; Yu J; Rana S; Gutiérrez AN; Hill PM
Med Phys; 2021 Jun; 48(6):3172-3185. PubMed ID: 33740253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dosimetric evaluation of a commercial proton spot scanning Monte-Carlo dose algorithm: comparisons against measurements and simulations.
Saini J; Maes D; Egan A; Bowen SR; St James S; Janson M; Wong T; Bloch C
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(19):7659-7681. PubMed ID: 28749373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The M. D. Anderson proton therapy system.
Smith A; Gillin M; Bues M; Zhu XR; Suzuki K; Mohan R; Woo S; Lee A; Komaki R; Cox J; Hiramoto K; Akiyama H; Ishida T; Sasaki T; Matsuda K
Med Phys; 2009 Sep; 36(9):4068-83. PubMed ID: 19810479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimization of FLASH proton beams using a track-repeating algorithm.
Wang Q; Titt U; Mohan R; Guan F; Zhao Y; Yang M; Yepes P
Med Phys; 2022 Oct; 49(10):6684-6698. PubMed ID: 35900902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Implementation of planar proton minibeam radiation therapy using a pencil beam scanning system: A proof of concept study.
De Marzi L; Patriarca A; Nauraye C; Hierso E; Dendale R; Guardiola C; Prezado Y
Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 45(11):5305-5316. PubMed ID: 30311639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Commissioning and beam characterization of the first gantry-mounted accelerator pencil beam scanning proton system.
Kang M; Pang D
Med Phys; 2020 Aug; 47(8):3496-3510. PubMed ID: 31840264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Calculation of the spatial variation of relative biological effectiveness in a therapeutic proton field for eye treatment.
Paganetti H
Phys Med Biol; 1998 Aug; 43(8):2147-57. PubMed ID: 9725595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimization of proton pencil beam positioning in collimated fields.
Behrends C; Bäumer C; Verbeek NG; Wulff J; Timmermann B
Med Phys; 2023 Apr; 50(4):2540-2551. PubMed ID: 36609847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of air gap, range shifter, and delivery technique on skin dose in proton therapy.
Kern A; Bäumer C; Kröninger K; Wulff J; Timmermann B
Med Phys; 2021 Feb; 48(2):831-840. PubMed ID: 33368345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
