These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

329 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30660067)

  • 1. Pedestrian's risk-based negotiation model for self-driving vehicles to get the right of way.
    Gupta S; Vasardani M; Lohani B; Winter S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Mar; 124():163-173. PubMed ID: 30660067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigating yielding behavior of heterogeneous vehicles at a semi-controlled crosswalk.
    Wang Y; Su Q; Wang C; Prato CG
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Oct; 161():106381. PubMed ID: 34479122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A game-theoretic approach for modelling pedestrian-vehicle conflict resolutions in uncontrolled traffic environments.
    Ezzati Amini R; Abouelela M; Dhamaniya A; Friedrich B; Antoniou C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Aug; 203():107604. PubMed ID: 38733807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The paradox of pedestrian's risk aversion.
    Hacohen S; Shoval S; Shvalb N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Jul; 142():105518. PubMed ID: 32416278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Investigating pedestrian waiting time at semi-controlled crossing locations: Application of multi-state models for recurrent events analysis.
    Zhang Y; Qiao Y; Fricker JD
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Mar; 137():105437. PubMed ID: 32036105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pedestrian-driver communication and decision strategies at marked crossings.
    Sucha M; Dostal D; Risser R
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 May; 102():41-50. PubMed ID: 28259827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gap acceptance probability model for pedestrians at unsignalized mid-block crosswalks based on logistic regression.
    Zhao J; Malenje JO; Tang Y; Han Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Aug; 129():76-83. PubMed ID: 31128443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pedestrians' perception and response towards vehicles during road-crossing at nighttime.
    Balasubramanian V; Bhardwaj R
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jan; 110():128-135. PubMed ID: 29131980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of grade separator on pedestrian risk taking behavior.
    Khatoon M; Tiwari G; Chatterjee N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jan; 50():861-70. PubMed ID: 22857788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Coupling intention and actions of vehicle-pedestrian interaction: A virtual reality experiment study.
    Dang M; Jin Y; Hang P; Crosato L; Sun Y; Wei C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Aug; 203():107639. PubMed ID: 38763064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of a conflict risk evaluation model to assess pedestrian safety in interaction with vehicles.
    Ezzati Amini R; Yang K; Antoniou C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 175():106773. PubMed ID: 35905611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interdependence of driver and pedestrian behavior in naturalistic roadway negotiations.
    Noonan TZ; Gershon P; Domeyer J; Mehler B; Reimer B
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(sup1):S62-S67. PubMed ID: 36026485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On-Board Detection of Pedestrian Intentions.
    Fang Z; Vázquez D; López AM
    Sensors (Basel); 2017 Sep; 17(10):. PubMed ID: 28946632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A novel framework to evaluate pedestrian safety at non-signalized locations.
    Fu T; Miranda-Moreno L; Saunier N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Feb; 111():23-33. PubMed ID: 29169102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modeling pedestrian gap crossing index under mixed traffic condition.
    Naser MM; Zulkiple A; Al Bargi WA; Khalifa NA; Daniel BD
    J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():91-98. PubMed ID: 29203029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Vehicle yielding probability estimation model at unsignalized midblock crosswalks in Shanghai, China.
    Malenje JO; Zhao J; Li P; Han Y
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0213876. PubMed ID: 30870520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Exploring the Determinants of the Severity of Pedestrian Injuries by Pedestrian Age: A Case Study of Daegu Metropolitan City, South Korea.
    Park SH; Bae MK
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Mar; 17(7):. PubMed ID: 32244336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparative study of safe and unsafe signalized intersections from the view point of pedestrian behavior and perception.
    Mukherjee D; Mitra S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Nov; 132():105218. PubMed ID: 31442923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modeling pedestrian crossing speed profiles considering speed change behavior for the safety assessment of signalized intersections.
    Iryo-Asano M; Alhajyaseen WKM
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Nov; 108():332-342. PubMed ID: 28942043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A cellular automaton simulation model for pedestrian and vehicle interaction behaviors at unsignalized mid-block crosswalks.
    Lu L; Ren G; Wang W; Chan CY; Wang J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Oct; 95(Pt B):425-437. PubMed ID: 27209354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.