158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30660480)
1. The effect of length of follow-up on substantial clinical benefit thresholds in patients undergoing surgery for cervical degenerative myelopathy.
Spurgas MP; Abbas SF; Szewczyk BS; Yim B; Ata A; German JW
J Clin Neurosci; 2019 Apr; 62():88-93. PubMed ID: 30660480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of minimally invasive posterior cervical decompression and open anterior cervical decompression and instrumented fusion in the surgical management of degenerative cervical myelopathy.
Abbas SF; Spurgas MP; Szewczyk BS; Yim B; Ata A; German JW
Neurosurg Focus; 2016 Jun; 40(6):E7. PubMed ID: 27246490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Neck Disability Index, short form-36 physical component summary, and pain scales for neck and arm pain: the minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit after cervical spine fusion.
Carreon LY; Glassman SD; Campbell MJ; Anderson PA
Spine J; 2010 Jun; 10(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20359958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of the minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical article.
Parker SL; Godil SS; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Feb; 18(2):154-60. PubMed ID: 23176164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of mental health on patient-reported outcomes in cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy surgery.
Diebo BG; Tishelman JC; Horn S; Poorman GW; Jalai C; Segreto FA; Bortz CA; Gerling MC; Lafage V; White AP; Mok JM; Cha TD; Eastlack RK; Radcliff KE; Paulino CB; Passias PG
J Clin Neurosci; 2018 Aug; 54():102-108. PubMed ID: 29907392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit Using PROMIS CAT in Cervical Spine Surgery.
Steinhaus ME; Iyer S; Lovecchio F; Khechen B; Stein D; Ross T; Yang J; Singh K; Albert TJ; Lebl D; Huang R; Sandhu H; Rawlins B; Schwab F; Lafage V; Kim HJ
Clin Spine Surg; 2019 Nov; 32(9):392-397. PubMed ID: 31569175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. PROMIS Physical Function Correlation With NDI and mJOA in the Surgical Cervical Myelopathy Patient Population.
Owen RJ; Zebala LP; Peters C; McAnany S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Apr; 43(8):550-555. PubMed ID: 28787313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) computerized adaptive tests in cervical spine surgery.
Boody BS; Bhatt S; Mazmudar AS; Hsu WK; Rothrock NE; Patel AA
J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Mar; 28(3):268-279. PubMed ID: 29303468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Preoperative mental health status may not be predictive of improvements in patient-reported outcomes following an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.
Mayo BC; Massel DH; Bohl DD; Narain AS; Hijji FY; Long WW; Modi KD; Basques BA; Yacob A; Singh K
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Feb; 26(2):177-182. PubMed ID: 27689424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patient phenotypes associated with outcome following surgery for mild degenerative cervical myelopathy: a principal component regression analysis.
Badhiwala JH; Witiw CD; Nassiri F; Jaja BNR; Akbar MA; Mansouri A; Merali Z; Ibrahim GM; Wilson JR; Fehlings MG
Spine J; 2018 Dec; 18(12):2220-2231. PubMed ID: 29746963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Arthroplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: similar results to patients with only radiculopathy at 3 years' follow-up.
Fay LY; Huang WC; Wu JC; Chang HK; Tsai TY; Ko CC; Tu TH; Wu CL; Cheng H
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Sep; 21(3):400-10. PubMed ID: 24926929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accurately measuring the quality and effectiveness of cervical spine surgery in registry efforts: determining the most valid and responsive instruments.
Godil SS; Parker SL; Zuckerman SL; Mendenhall SK; McGirt MJ
Spine J; 2015 Jun; 15(6):1203-9. PubMed ID: 24076442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Correlation of quality of life and functional outcome measures for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
Lubelski D; Alvin MD; Nesterenko S; Sundar SJ; Thompson NR; Benzel EC; Mroz TE
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Mar; 24(3):483-9. PubMed ID: 26613280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Usefulness of QuickDASH in patients with cervical laminoplasty.
Nakamoto H; Oshima Y; Takeshita K; Chikuda H; Ono T; Taniguchi Y; Tanaka S
J Orthop Sci; 2014 Mar; 19(2):218-222. PubMed ID: 24390596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How closely are outcome questionnaires correlated to patient satisfaction after cervical spine surgery for myelopathy?
Zaki MM; Joshi RS; Ibrahim S; Michalopoulos GD; Linzey JR; Saadeh YS; Upadhyaya C; Coric D; Potts EA; Bisson EF; Turner JD; Knightly JJ; Fu KM; Foley KT; Tumialan L; Shaffrey ME; Bydon M; Mummaneni PV; Chou D; Chan AK; Meyer S; Asher AL; Shaffrey CI; Gottfried ON; Than KD; Wang M; Haid R; Slotkin JR; Glassman SD; Park P
J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 May; 38(5):521-529. PubMed ID: 36805998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laminoplasty versus laminectomy with fusion for the treatment of spondylotic cervical myelopathy: short-term follow-up.
Blizzard DJ; Caputo AM; Sheets CZ; Klement MR; Michael KW; Isaacs RE; Brown CR
Eur Spine J; 2017 Jan; 26(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 27554354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Usefulness of minimum clinically important difference for assessing patients with subaxial degenerative cervical spine disease: statistical versus substantial clinical benefit.
Auffinger B; Lam S; Shen J; Thaci B; Roitberg BZ
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2013 Dec; 155(12):2345-54; discussion 2355. PubMed ID: 24136679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The likelihood of reaching minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit at 2 years following a 3-column osteotomy: analysis of 140 patients.
Fakurnejad S; Scheer JK; Lafage V; Smith JS; Deviren V; Hostin R; Mundis GM; Burton DC; Klineberg E; Gupta M; Kebaish K; Shaffrey CI; Bess S; Schwab F; Ames CP;
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Sep; 23(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 26091440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Which NDI domains best predict change in physical function in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery?
Steinhaus ME; Iyer S; Lovecchio F; Stein D; Ross T; Yang J; Lafage V; Albert TJ; Kim HJ
Spine J; 2019 Oct; 19(10):1698-1705. PubMed ID: 31207316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect on clinical outcomes of patient pain expectancies and preoperative Mental Component Summary scores from the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.
Carr FA; Healy KM; Villavicencio AT; Nelson EL; Mason A; Burneikiene S; Hernández TD
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Nov; 15(5):486-90. PubMed ID: 21819184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
