These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30661154)
1. The choice of intrinsic axis under multi-cue conditions. Li J; Xie N; Zhao W Cogn Process; 2019 May; 20(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 30661154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. THE LIMITED EFFECT OF COINCIDENT ORIENTATION ON THE CHOICE OF INTRINSIC AXIS (.). Li J; Su W Percept Mot Skills; 2015 Jun; 120(3):895-905. PubMed ID: 25938449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reference frames in spatial updating when body-based cues are absent. He Q; McNamara TP; Kelly JW Mem Cognit; 2018 Jan; 46(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 28755051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Geometric cues, reference frames, and the equivalence of experienced-aligned and novel-aligned views in human spatial memory. Kelly JW; Sjolund LA; Sturz BR Cognition; 2013 Mar; 126(3):459-74. PubMed ID: 23305700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intrinsic frames of reference in spatial memory. Mou W; McNamara TP J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jan; 28(1):162-70. PubMed ID: 11827078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cue interaction between buildings and street configurations during reorientation in familiar and unfamiliar outdoor environments. Wang L; Mou W; Dixon P J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Apr; 44(4):631-644. PubMed ID: 29094988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The habitual motor vertical of humans depends on gravicentric and egocentric cues, but only little on visual cues. Bury N; Bock O Exp Brain Res; 2018 Oct; 236(10):2545-2552. PubMed ID: 29931569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Roles of egocentric and allocentric spatial representations in locomotion and reorientation. Mou W; McNamara TP; Rump B; Xiao C J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1274-90. PubMed ID: 17087583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Spatial memories of virtual environments: how egocentric experience, intrinsic structure, and extrinsic structure interact. Kelly JW; McNamara TP Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Apr; 15(2):322-7. PubMed ID: 18488647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Orientation in Virtual Reality Does Not Fully Measure Up to the Real-World. Kimura K; Reichert JF; Olson A; Pouya OR; Wang X; Moussavi Z; Kelly DM Sci Rep; 2017 Dec; 7(1):18109. PubMed ID: 29273759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Examining reference frame interaction in spatial memory using a distribution analysis. Street WN; Wang RF Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Feb; 23(1):239-45. PubMed ID: 26032226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reference directions and reference objects in spatial memory of a briefly viewed layout. Mou W; Xiao C; McNamara TP Cognition; 2008 Jul; 108(1):136-54. PubMed ID: 18342299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Judgements of relative direction: the effect of task instructions on spatial recall. Donaldson P; Tlauka M; Robertson C Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013 Jun; 66(6):1090-103. PubMed ID: 23057609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Coincident orientation of objects and viewpoint-dependence in scene recognition. Li J; Zhang K Percept Mot Skills; 2012 Feb; 114(1):301-9. PubMed ID: 22582697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Toward a definition of intrinsic axes: the effect of orthogonality and symmetry on the preferred direction of spatial memory. Richard L; Waller D J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Nov; 39(6):1914-29. PubMed ID: 23751008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]