368 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30661184)
1. Impact of lens density and lens thickness on cumulative dissipated energy in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.
Shajari M; Rusev V; Mayer W; Diakonis V; Petermann K; Kohnen T
Lasers Med Sci; 2019 Aug; 34(6):1229-1234. PubMed ID: 30661184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Preliminary evaluation of the femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery in 300 cases].
Wang Y; Bao X; Zhou Y; Xu R; Peng T; Sun M; Cao D; He L
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Sep; 51(9):689-93. PubMed ID: 26693655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss Between Two Femtosecond Laser Platforms and Standard Phacoemulsification.
Al-Mohtaseb Z; He X; Yesilirmak N; Waren D; Donaldson KE
J Refract Surg; 2017 Oct; 33(10):708-712. PubMed ID: 28991340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of cumulative dispersed energy between conventional phacoemulsification and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery with two different lens fragmentation patterns.
Lin HY; Kao ST; Chuang YJ; Chen S; Lin PJ
Lasers Med Sci; 2022 Mar; 37(2):843-848. PubMed ID: 33876322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of lens densitometry on phacoemulsification parameters and usage of ultrasound energy in femtosecond laser-assisted lens surgery.
Al-Khateeb G; Shajari M; Vunnava K; Petermann K; Kohnen T
Can J Ophthalmol; 2017 Aug; 52(4):331-337. PubMed ID: 28774512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of clinical outcomes between femtosecond laser-assisted versus conventional phacoemulsification.
Ang RET; Quinto MMS; Cruz EM; Rivera MCR; Martinez GHA
Eye Vis (Lond); 2018; 5():8. PubMed ID: 29713653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can we improve the efficacy of modern cataract surgery by using different tip designs? A comparison of balanced and tapered tip in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and manual phacoemulsification.
Pahlitzsch M; Pahlitzsch ML; Sumarni U; Pahlitzsch T
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Jan; 46(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 28563995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of ultrasound energy consumption between low-energy femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and conventional phacoemulsification cataract surgery in patients with different cataract densities.
Ou Y; Wang Y; Wu T
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2023 May; 33(3):1373-1379. PubMed ID: 36575599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of Lens Fragmentation Patterns on Phacoemulsification Parameters and Postoperative Inflammation in Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery.
Kaur M; Titiyal JS; Surve A; Falera R; Verma M
Curr Eye Res; 2018 Oct; 43(10):1228-1232. PubMed ID: 29874114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of surgical parameters using different lens fragmentation patterns in eyes undergoing laser-assisted cataract surgery.
Uy HS; Chan PS; Gil-Cazorla R; Shah S
Int Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov; 39(11):2459-2465. PubMed ID: 30830545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery in eyes with shallow anterior chamber depth: comparison with conventional phacoemulsification.
Mencucci R; De Vitto C; Cennamo M; Vignapiano R; Buzzi M; Favuzza E
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2020 Dec; 46(12):1604-1610. PubMed ID: 32932370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of phacoemulsification parameters between manual and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.
Yesilirmak N; Diakonis VF; Batlle JF; Sayed-Ahmed IO; Davis Z; Waren DP; Yoo SH; O'Brien TP; Donaldson KE
Can J Ophthalmol; 2018 Oct; 53(5):542-547. PubMed ID: 30340726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predictors of intraocular pressure reduction after femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus conventional phacoemulsification surgery: a prospective trial.
Devience EX; Awidi A; Kalarn S; DeVience S; Bui B; Munir WM; Kaleem MA; Im L; Jeng BH; Daoud Y; Saeedi OJ
Int Ophthalmol; 2023 Jan; 43(1):285-292. PubMed ID: 35870049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of cumulative dispersed energy (CDE) in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) and conventional phacoemulsification.
Saeedi OJ; Chang LY; Ong SR; Karim SA; Abraham DS; Rosenthal GL; Hammer A; Spagnolo BV; Betancourt AE
Int Ophthalmol; 2019 Aug; 39(8):1761-1766. PubMed ID: 30054849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of the Femtosecond Laser in Line with the Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery (FLACS) on the Anterior Chamber Characteristics in Comparison to the Manual Phacoemulsification.
Pahlitzsch M; Torun N; Pahlitzsch ML; Klamann MKJ; Gonnermann J; Bertelmann E; Pahlitzsch T
Semin Ophthalmol; 2017; 32(4):456-461. PubMed ID: 27092399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A novel method to compare phacoemulsification parameters in vivo: two halves of one nucleus.
Tomilova E; Shukhaev S
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 254(8):1579-1584. PubMed ID: 27325424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus 2.2 mm clear corneal phacoemulsification.
Ranjini H; Murthy PR; Murthy GJ; Murthy VR
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2017 Oct; 65(10):942-948. PubMed ID: 29044058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of real-world treatment outcomes of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and phacoemulsification cataract surgery: A retrospective, observational study from an outpatient clinic in France.
Charles Crozafon P; Bouchet C; Zignani M; Griner R; Foster SD; Zou M; Dhariwal M
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2021 Jul; 31(4):1809-1816. PubMed ID: 32452248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Differences in energy expenditure for conventional and femtosecond-assisted cataract surgery using 2 different phacoemulsification systems.
Yesilirmak N; Diakonis VF; Sise A; Waren DP; Yoo SH; Donaldson KE
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2017 Jan; 43(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 28317672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of optical quality and distinct macular thickness in femtosecond laser-assisted versus phacoemulsification cataract surgery.
Wang Y; Zhang J; Qin M; Miao J; Chen W; Huang Y; Wu J; Guan Y; Guan H
BMC Ophthalmol; 2020 Feb; 20(1):42. PubMed ID: 32007086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
