BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

521 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30661250)

  • 1. Updated breast CT dose coefficients (DgN
    Hernandez AM; Becker AE; Boone JM
    Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1455-1466. PubMed ID: 30661250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Breast dose in mammography is about 30% lower when realistic heterogeneous glandular distributions are considered.
    Hernandez AM; Seibert JA; Boone JM
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6337-48. PubMed ID: 26520725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Average glandular dose coefficients for pendant-geometry breast CT using realistic breast phantoms.
    Hernandez AM; Boone JM
    Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5096-5105. PubMed ID: 28715130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Monte Carlo evaluation of glandular dose in cone-beam X-ray computed tomography dedicated to the breast: Homogeneous and heterogeneous breast models.
    Sarno A; Mettivier G; Tucciariello RM; Bliznakova K; Boone JM; Sechopoulos I; Di Lillo F; Russo P
    Phys Med; 2018 Jul; 51():99-107. PubMed ID: 29885958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Monte Carlo calculation of monoenergetic and polyenergetic DgN coefficients for mean glandular dose estimates in mammography using a homogeneous breast model.
    Sarno A; Tucciariello RM; Mettivier G; di Franco F; Russo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jun; 64(12):125012. PubMed ID: 31141793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Characterization of the homogeneous tissue mixture approximation in breast imaging dosimetry.
    Sechopoulos I; Bliznakova K; Qin X; Fei B; Feng SS
    Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5050-9. PubMed ID: 22894430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dosimetric characterization of a dedicated breast computed tomography clinical prototype.
    Sechopoulos I; Feng SS; D'Orsi CJ
    Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4110-20. PubMed ID: 20879571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dataset of patient-derived digital breast phantoms for in silico studies in breast computed tomography, digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography.
    Sarno A; Mettivier G; di Franco F; Varallo A; Bliznakova K; Hernandez AM; Boone JM; Russo P
    Med Phys; 2021 May; 48(5):2682-2693. PubMed ID: 33683711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dedicated cone-beam breast CT: Data acquisition strategies based on projection angle-dependent normalized glandular dose coefficients.
    Tseng HW; Karellas A; Vedantham S
    Med Phys; 2023 Mar; 50(3):1406-1417. PubMed ID: 36427332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Generation and analysis of clinically relevant breast imaging x-ray spectra.
    Hernandez AM; Seibert JA; Nosratieh A; Boone JM
    Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2148-2160. PubMed ID: 28303582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-layer heterogeneous mammographic phantoms for Monte Carlo simulation of normalized glandular dose coefficients in mammography.
    Chang TY; Lai KJ; Tu CY; Wu J
    Sci Rep; 2020 Feb; 10(1):2234. PubMed ID: 32042071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Investigating energy deposition in glandular tissues for mammography using multiscale Monte Carlo simulations.
    Oliver PAK; Thomson RM
    Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1426-1436. PubMed ID: 30657190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Monte Carlo simulation for the estimation of the glandular breast dose for a digital breast tomosynthesis system.
    Rodrigues L; Magalhaes LA; Braz D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Dec; 167(4):576-83. PubMed ID: 25480841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of fibroglandular tissue distribution and breast shape in voxelized breast models for dosimetry in mammography.
    Ferrauche G; Tramontin G; Massera RT; Tomal A
    Phys Med Biol; 2023 Mar; 68(7):. PubMed ID: 36827710
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients from experimental mammographic x-ray spectra.
    Santos JC; Tomal A; de Barros N; Costa PR
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 May; 64(10):105010. PubMed ID: 30959490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparisons of glandular breast dose between digital mammography, tomosynthesis and breast CT based on anthropomorphic patient-derived breast phantoms.
    Sarno A; Mettivier G; Bliznakova K; Hernandez AM; Boone JM; Russo P
    Phys Med; 2022 May; 97():50-58. PubMed ID: 35395535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patient-derived heterogeneous breast phantoms for advanced dosimetry in mammography and tomosynthesis.
    Caballo M; Rabin C; Fedon C; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; Diaz O; Boone JM; Dance DR; Sechopoulos I
    Med Phys; 2022 Aug; 49(8):5423-5438. PubMed ID: 35635844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients for flat-panel CT breast imaging.
    Thacker SC; Glick SJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Dec; 49(24):5433-44. PubMed ID: 15724534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Glandular dose indices using a glandular dose to air kerma volume histogram in mammography.
    Shinohara S; Araki F; Ohno T
    Med Phys; 2020 Mar; 47(3):1340-1348. PubMed ID: 31859402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comprehensive analysis of DgN(CT) coefficients for pendant-geometry cone-beam breast computed tomography.
    Boone JM; Shah N; Nelson TR
    Med Phys; 2004 Feb; 31(2):226-35. PubMed ID: 15000608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.