BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30661295)

  • 1. Assessment of individual bioequivalence using sufficient bootstrap procedure.
    Beyaztas U
    Pharm Stat; 2019 May; 18(3):388-398. PubMed ID: 30661295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Average bioequivalence for two-sequence two-period crossover design with incomplete data.
    Lee JY; Kim BC; Park SG
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(5):857-67. PubMed ID: 16078389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bioequivalence trials with the incomplete 3 x 3 crossover design.
    Lim NK; Park SG; Stanek E
    Biom J; 2005 Oct; 47(5):635-43. PubMed ID: 16385904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bioequivalence and intrasubject variability.
    Liu JP
    J Biopharm Stat; 1991; 1(2):205-19. PubMed ID: 1844697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Alternative confidence intervals for the assessment of bioequivalence in four-period cross-over designs.
    Quiroz J; Ting N; Wei GC; Burdick RK
    Stat Med; 2002 Jul; 21(13):1825-47. PubMed ID: 12111892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Two-stage designs for cross-over bioequivalence trials.
    Kieser M; Rauch G
    Stat Med; 2015 Jul; 34(16):2403-16. PubMed ID: 25809815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On population and individual bioequivalence.
    Schall R; Luus HG
    Stat Med; 1993 Jun; 12(12):1109-24. PubMed ID: 8210816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Truncated area under the curve as a measure of relative extent of bioavailability: evaluation using experimental data and Monte Carlo simulations.
    Gaudreault J; Potvin D; Lavigne J; Lalonde RL
    Pharm Res; 1998 Oct; 15(10):1621-9. PubMed ID: 9794507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of bioequivalence using a multiplicative model.
    Chow SC; Peace KE; Shao J
    J Biopharm Stat; 1991; 1(2):193-203. PubMed ID: 1844696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of group sequential and fixed sample size designs for bioequivalence trials with highly variable drugs.
    Knahl SIE; Lang B; Fleischer F; Kieser M
    Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 2018 May; 74(5):549-559. PubMed ID: 29362819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robust and bootstrap testing procedures for bioequivalence.
    Shen CF; Iglewicz B
    J Biopharm Stat; 1994 Mar; 4(1):65-90. PubMed ID: 8019585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Controlling type 1 error rate for sequential, bioequivalence studies with crossover designs.
    Rasmussen HE; Ma R; Wang JJ
    Pharm Stat; 2019 Jan; 18(1):96-105. PubMed ID: 30370634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. New approach to assess bioequivalence parameters using generalized gamma mixed-effect model (model-based asymptotic bioequivalence test).
    Chen YI; Huang CS
    Stat Med; 2014 Feb; 33(5):786-97. PubMed ID: 24105871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. First measured plasma concentration value as C(max); impact on the C(max) confidence interval in bioequivalence studies.
    Jackson A; Conner D; Miller R
    Biopharm Drug Dispos; 2000 May; 21(4):139-46. PubMed ID: 11180192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Experimental design and statistical methods for classical and bioequivalence hypothesis testing with an application to dairy nutrition studies.
    Tempelman RJ
    J Anim Sci; 2004; 82 E-Suppl():E162-172. PubMed ID: 15471796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detection of outlying data in bioavailability/bioequivalence studies.
    Liu JP; Weng CS
    Stat Med; 1991 Sep; 10(9):1375-89. PubMed ID: 1925168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new approach for outliers in a bioavailability/bioequivalence study.
    Liao JJ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(3):393-405. PubMed ID: 17479389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of single and multiple dose pharmacokinetics using clinical bioequivalence data and Monte Carlo simulations.
    el-Tahtawy AA; Jackson AJ; Ludden TM
    Pharm Res; 1994 Sep; 11(9):1330-6. PubMed ID: 7816765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitative assessment of the switchability of generic products.
    Karalis V; Bialer M; Macheras P
    Eur J Pharm Sci; 2013 Nov; 50(3-4):476-83. PubMed ID: 23981332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.