These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3066296)

  • 1. Examination of previous caesarean section scars by ultrasound.
    Fukuda M; Fukuda K; Mochizuki M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1988; 243(4):221-4. PubMed ID: 3066296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ultrasound examination of caesarean section scars during pregnancy.
    Fukuda M; Shimizu T; Ihara Y; Fukuda K; Natsuyama E; Mochizuki M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1991; 248(3):129-38. PubMed ID: 2018409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Deficient lower-segment Cesarean section scars: prevalence and risk factors.
    Ofili-Yebovi D; Ben-Nagi J; Sawyer E; Yazbek J; Lee C; Gonzalez J; Jurkovic D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jan; 31(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 18061960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High prevalence of defects in Cesarean section scars at transvaginal ultrasound examination.
    Osser OV; Jokubkiene L; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jul; 34(1):90-7. PubMed ID: 19499514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prediction of cesarean section scars with ultrasound imaging during pregnancy.
    Lonky NM; Worthen N; Ross MG
    J Ultrasound Med; 1989 Jan; 8(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 2644438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Correlations between sonographically measured and actual incision site thickness of lower uterine segment after repeated caesarean section.
    Indraccolo U; Scutiero G; Matteo M; Mastricci AL; Barone I; Greco P
    Minerva Ginecol; 2015 Jun; 67(3):225-9. PubMed ID: 25909490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Single versus double-layer uterine closure at cesarean: impact on lower uterine segment thickness at next pregnancy.
    Vachon-Marceau C; Demers S; Bujold E; Roberge S; Gauthier RJ; Pasquier JC; Girard M; Chaillet N; Boulvain M; Jastrow N
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jul; 217(1):65.e1-65.e5. PubMed ID: 28263751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ultrasonographic measurement of lower uterine segment to assess risk of defects of scarred uterus.
    Rozenberg P; Goffinet F; Phillippe HJ; Nisand I
    Lancet; 1996 Feb; 347(8997):281-4. PubMed ID: 8569360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ultrasonography of the lower uterine segment after multiple caesarean sections.
    Kirkinen P
    Ann Med; 1990 Apr; 22(2):137-9. PubMed ID: 2193660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dehiscent scar in the lower uterine segment after Caesarean section and IVF infertility treatment: a case report.
    Filipcikova R; Oborna I; Brezinova J; Bezdickova M; Laichman S; Dobias M; Blazkova Z; Hladikova B; Pastucha D
    Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub; 2014 Dec; 158(4):654-8. PubMed ID: 23446209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Echographic and morphological parallels in the evaluation of the condition of the uterine scar].
    Lebedev VA; Strizhakov AN; Zheleznov BI
    Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1991 Aug; (8):44-9. PubMed ID: 1755492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fetal survival following posterior uterine wall rupture during labour with intact previous caesarean section scar.
    Majumdar S; Warren R; Ifaturoti O
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Nov; 276(5):537-40. PubMed ID: 17440745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Ultrasonographic analysis of cesarean scars features in nonpregnant uterus].
    Zimmer M; Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Tomiałowicz M; Michniewicz J; Wiatrowski A; Mikołajczyk K
    Ginekol Pol; 2007 Nov; 78(11):842-6. PubMed ID: 18306913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Risk factors for incomplete healing of the uterine incision after caesarean section.
    Vikhareva Osser O; Valentin L
    BJOG; 2010 Aug; 117(9):1119-26. PubMed ID: 20604776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ultrasound diagnosis of defects in the scarred lower uterine segment during pregnancy.
    Michaels WH; Thompson HO; Boutt A; Schreiber FR; Michaels SL; Karo J
    Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Jan; 71(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 3275907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Variables influencing the integrity of lower uterine segment in post-cesarean pregnancy.
    Brahmalakshmy BL; Kushtagi P
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Apr; 291(4):755-62. PubMed ID: 25209351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Incomplete healing of the uterine incision after caesarean section: Is it preventable?
    Yazicioglu F; Gökdogan A; Kelekci S; Aygün M; Savan K
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Jan; 124(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 16023780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sonographic evaluation of the wall thickness of the lower uterine segment in patients with previous cesarean section.
    Tanik A; Ustun C; Cil E; Arslan A
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1996 Sep; 24(7):355-7. PubMed ID: 8873858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laparoscopic repair of a symptomatic post-cesarean section isthmocele: a video case report.
    Aimi G; Buggio L; Berlanda N; Vercellini P
    Fertil Steril; 2017 Jun; 107(6):e17-e18. PubMed ID: 28483506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ultrasonographic evaluation of lower uterine segment to predict the integrity and quality of cesarean scar during pregnancy: a prospective study.
    Qureshi B; Inafuku K; Oshima K; Masamoto H; Kanazawa K
    Tohoku J Exp Med; 1997 Sep; 183(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 9453117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.