These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. How female fellows fared at the Royal Society. Fyfe A; Røstvik CM Nature; 2018 Mar; 555(7695):159-161. PubMed ID: 29517005 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Careers and controversy before the First World War. Jones C Nature; 2019 Nov; 575(7781):239-242. PubMed ID: 31690865 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Gender balance at the heart of science. Small HY; Timoteo AT; Buchanan GL; Gimelli A; Jurcut R; Marsan NA; Schüpke S; Zuhlke L Cardiovasc Res; 2020 Aug; 116(10):e115-e117. PubMed ID: 32516801 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Can authorship policies help prevent scientific misconduct? What role for scientific societies? Jones AH Sci Eng Ethics; 2003 Apr; 9(2):243-56. PubMed ID: 12774656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A statement on ethics from the HEART group. HEART Group Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 May; 71(6):859-61. PubMed ID: 18412086 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The counting house. Adam D Nature; 2002 Feb; 415(6873):726-9. PubMed ID: 11845174 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A statement on ethics from the HEART Group. HEART Group Prog Cardiovasc Dis; 2008; 50(6):475-7. PubMed ID: 18488290 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Index aims for fair ranking of scientists. Ball P Nature; 2005 Aug; 436(7053):900. PubMed ID: 16107806 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Journals invite too few women to referee. Lerback J; Hanson B Nature; 2017 Jan; 541(7638):455-457. PubMed ID: 28128272 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Gender inequality in the authorship of medical articles: Analysis of Medicina Clinica, 1999 and 2014]. Padilla-Navas I; Soler Sempere MJ; Zamora Molina L; García-Pachón E Med Clin (Barc); 2015 Dec; 145(11):e31-2. PubMed ID: 25851907 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The foundation and consequences of gender bias in grant peer review processes. Morgan R; Hawkins K; Lundine J CMAJ; 2018 Apr; 190(16):E487-E488. PubMed ID: 29685908 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Peer review: Troubled from the start. Csiszar A Nature; 2016 Apr; 532(7599):306-8. PubMed ID: 27111616 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Ladies First? Not So Fast: Linguistic Sexism in Peer-Reviewed Research. Willis M; Jozkowski KN J Sex Res; 2018 Feb; 55(2):137-145. PubMed ID: 28753394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Gender Differences in the Authorship of Original Research in Pediatric Journals, 2001-2016. Fishman M; Williams WA; Goodman DM; Ross LF J Pediatr; 2017 Dec; 191():244-249.e1. PubMed ID: 29033241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Research papers, gender bias and peer-review. Battarbee R Biol Lett; 2017 Aug; 13(8):. PubMed ID: 28794278 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]