These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30664013)

  • 1. Conclusiveness of Cochrane Reviews in physiotherapy: a systematic search and analytical review.
    Momosaki R; Tsuboi M; Yasufuku Y; Furudate K; Kamo T; Uda K; Tanaka Y; Abo M
    Int J Rehabil Res; 2019 Jun; 42(2):97-105. PubMed ID: 30664013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conclusiveness of the Cochrane Reviews in Pediatric-Gastroenterology: a systematic analysis.
    Cohen S; Lubetzky R; Mimouni FB; Marom R; Mandel D
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Feb; 25(2):252-4. PubMed ID: 23044810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Conclusiveness of the Cochrane reviews in nutrition: a systematic analysis.
    Cohen S; Mandel D; Mimouni FB; Marom R; Lubetzky R
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2014 Feb; 68(2):143-5. PubMed ID: 24327125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Conclusiveness of the Cochrane Reviews in Palliative and Supportive Care for Cancer.
    Zhang X; Wu Z; Zhao H; Li C; Wu J; Dai G
    Am J Hosp Palliat Care; 2017 Feb; 34(1):53-56. PubMed ID: 26353985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Conclusiveness of the Cochrane Neonatal Reviews: a systematic analysis.
    Mandel D; Littner Y; Mimouni FB; Lubetzky R
    Acta Paediatr; 2006 Oct; 95(10):1209-12. PubMed ID: 16982491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Conclusiveness of the Cochrane Eye and Vision Group Reviews.
    Mimouni M; Mimouni F; Segev F
    BMC Res Notes; 2015 Jun; 8():242. PubMed ID: 26076817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Conclusiveness of the Cochrane reviews in gynaecological cancer: A systematic analysis.
    Yin S; Chuai Y; Wang A; Zhang L
    J Int Med Res; 2015 Jun; 43(3):311-5. PubMed ID: 25870179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How to decide whether a systematic review is stable and not in need of updating: Analysis of Cochrane reviews.
    Babić A; Poklepovic Pericic T; Pieper D; Puljak L
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Nov; 11(6):884-890. PubMed ID: 32890455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cochrane reviews used more rigorous methods than non-Cochrane reviews: survey of systematic reviews in physiotherapy.
    Moseley AM; Elkins MR; Herbert RD; Maher CG; Sherrington C
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Oct; 62(10):1021-30. PubMed ID: 19282144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reasons and factors associated with inconclusiveness of systematic reviews about interventions for neuropathic pain.
    Dosenovic S; Dujmic A; Nujic D; Vuka I; Tintor G; Kadic AJ; Puljak L
    J Comp Eff Res; 2021 Jan; 10(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 33355481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. When is the evidence conclusive? Analysis of systematic reviews for which Cochrane declared that conclusions will not change with further studies.
    Babić A; Poklepović Peričić T; Pieper D; Puljak L
    Res Synth Methods; 2022 Jul; 13(4):478-488. PubMed ID: 35278034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Methodological quality of systematic reviews in subfertility: a comparison of Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews in assisted reproductive technologies.
    Windsor B; Popovich I; Jordan V; Showell M; Shea B; Farquhar C
    Hum Reprod; 2012 Dec; 27(12):3460-6. PubMed ID: 23034152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evidence-based guidelines for physiotherapy management of patients with multiple myeloma: study protocol.
    Jeevanantham D; Rajendran V; Tremblay L; Larivière C; Knight A
    Syst Rev; 2018 Aug; 7(1):118. PubMed ID: 30111363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Potential and Limitations of Cochrane Reviews in Pediatric Cardiology: A Systematic Analysis.
    Poryo M; Khosrawikatoli S; Abdul-Khaliq H; Meyer S
    Pediatr Cardiol; 2017 Apr; 38(4):719-733. PubMed ID: 28239752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Review of Cochrane Systematic Reviews of Interventions Relevant to Orthoptic Practice.
    Rowe FJ; Elliott S; Gordon I; Shah A
    Strabismus; 2017 Sep; 25(3):101-111. PubMed ID: 28414562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conclusiveness, linguistic characteristics and readability of Cochrane plain language summaries of intervention reviews: a cross-sectional study.
    Banić A; Fidahić M; Šuto J; Roje R; Vuka I; Puljak L; Buljan I
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Sep; 22(1):240. PubMed ID: 36088293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical recommendations of Cochrane reviews in pediatric gastroenterology: systematic analysis.
    Goda Y; Sauer H; Schöndorf D; Hennes P; Gortner L; Gräber S; Meyer S
    Pediatr Int; 2015; 57(1):98-106. PubMed ID: 24978114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. 2009 updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group.
    Furlan AD; Pennick V; Bombardier C; van Tulder M;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Aug; 34(18):1929-41. PubMed ID: 19680101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role and limitations of Cochrane reviews at the bedside: a systematic synopsis of five pediatric subspecialties.
    Meyer S; Poryo M; Khosrawikatoli S; Goda Y; Zemlin M
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 2017 Sep; 167(11-12):276-281. PubMed ID: 28255743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.