BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30664599)

  • 1. Prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT functional parameters in patients with head and neck cancer: a meta-analysis.
    Wang L; Bai J; Duan P
    Nucl Med Commun; 2019 Apr; 40(4):361-369. PubMed ID: 30664599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prognostic Value of Volumetric Parameters of Pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT in Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Han S; Kim YJ; Woo S; Suh CH; Lee JJ
    Clin Nucl Med; 2018 Dec; 43(12):887-894. PubMed ID: 30300200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prognostic Value of Volumetric Parameters Measured by Pretreatment 18F FDG PET/CT in Patients With Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma.
    Son SH; Kang SM; Jeong SY; Lee SW; Lee SJ; Lee J; Ahn BC
    Clin Nucl Med; 2016 Jun; 41(6):e266-73. PubMed ID: 27055144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prognostic value of 18F-FDG-PET/CT parameters in patients with pancreatic carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Zhu D; Wang L; Zhang H; Chen J; Wang Y; Byanju S; Liao M
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Aug; 96(33):e7813. PubMed ID: 28816978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pretreatment tumor SUV
    Ha SC; Oh JS; Roh JL; Moon H; Kim JS; Cho KJ; Choi SH; Nam SY; Kim SY
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Jan; 44(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 27448574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Prognostic value of pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET-CT for patients with advanced diffuse large B-cell lymphoma].
    Ding CY; Guo Z; Sun J; Yang WP; Li TR
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2018 Jul; 40(7):528-533. PubMed ID: 30060362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prognostic value of maximum standard uptake value, metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis of positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Wen W; Xuan D; Hu Y; Li X; Liu L; Xu D
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0225959. PubMed ID: 31826010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prognostic role of metabolic parameters of (18)F-FDG PET-CT scan performed during radiation therapy in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
    Min M; Lin P; Lee MT; Shon IH; Lin M; Forstner D; Bray V; Chicco A; Tieu MT; Fowler A
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Dec; 42(13):1984-94. PubMed ID: 26081941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prognostic value of pretreatment 18F-FDG PET-CT for nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.
    Huang Y; Feng M; He Q; Yin J; Xu P; Jiang Q; Lang J
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Apr; 96(17):e6721. PubMed ID: 28445287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prognostic significance of standardized uptake value on F18-FDG PET/CT in patients with extranodal nasal type NK/T cell lymphoma: A multicenter, retrospective analysis.
    Pak K; Kim BS; Kim K; Kim IJ; Jun S; Jeong YJ; Shim HK; Kim SD; Cho KS
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2018; 39(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 29056243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prognostic Value of Pretreatment Metabolic Tumor Volume and Total Lesion Glycolysis Using 18F-FDG PET/CT in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-Targeted Agents.
    Hwang SH; Cho A; Yun M; Choi YD; Rha SY; Kang WJ
    Clin Nucl Med; 2017 May; 42(5):e235-e241. PubMed ID: 28288043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prognostic value comparison between (18)F-FLT PET/CT and (18)F-FDG PET/CT volume-based metabolic parameters in patients with head and neck cancer.
    Hoshikawa H; Mori T; Yamamoto Y; Kishino T; Fukumura T; Samukawa Y; Mori N; Nishiyama Y
    Clin Nucl Med; 2015 Jun; 40(6):464-8. PubMed ID: 25546204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prognostic value of maximum standard uptake value, metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis of positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Li Q; Zhang J; Cheng W; Zhu C; Chen L; Xia F; Wang M; Yang F; Ma X
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Sep; 96(37):e8084. PubMed ID: 28906411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prognostic value of MTV and TLG of 18 F-FDG PET in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis.
    Jin A; Lin X; Yin X; Cui Y; Ma L
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Sep; 101(39):e30798. PubMed ID: 36181127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the Prognostic Value of FDG PET/CT Parameters for Patients With Surgically Treated Head and Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review.
    Creff G; Devillers A; Depeursinge A; Palard-Novello X; Acosta O; Jegoux F; Castelli J
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2020 May; 146(5):471-479. PubMed ID: 32215611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET-CT-based functional parameters in patients with soft tissue sarcoma: A meta-analysis.
    Chen L; Wu X; Ma X; Guo L; Zhu C; Li Q
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Feb; 96(6):e5913. PubMed ID: 28178131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prognostic Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Surgical Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.
    Liu J; Dong M; Sun X; Li W; Xing L; Yu J
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0146195. PubMed ID: 26727114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prognostic value of volume-based metabolic parameters of
    Han S; Kim H; Kim YJ; Suh CH; Woo S
    Ann Nucl Med; 2018 Dec; 32(10):669-677. PubMed ID: 30101392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prognostic significance of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography parameters in patients with biliary tract cancers: a meta-analysis.
    Zheng X; Shi Y; Kulabieke D; Wang Z; Cheng Y; Qian J
    BMC Med Imaging; 2024 Jan; 24(1):9. PubMed ID: 38166643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prognostic Value of Volume-Based Metabolic Parameters of
    Han S; Kim H; Kim YJ; Suh CH; Woo S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Nov; 211(5):1112-1121. PubMed ID: 30207790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.