BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30664841)

  • 1. Psychometric Properties of the Short Form of the Health Practices Questionnaire-II Chinese Version.
    Wang LH; Chang YP; Chou HF; Doerzbacher M; Lin HS
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2019 Mar; 48(2):205-215. PubMed ID: 30664841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of a Chinese short form of the Prenatal Self-Evaluation Questionnaire.
    Lin CT; Cheng CP; Kuo SH; Chou FH
    J Clin Nurs; 2009 Mar; 18(5):659-66. PubMed ID: 19239534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Testing the Health Practices in Pregnancy Questionnaire-II.
    Lindgren K
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2005; 34(4):465-72. PubMed ID: 16020414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Turkish adaptation of the pregnancy-related anxiety questionnaire-revised 2: Validity and reliability study in multiparous and primiparous pregnancy.
    Aksoy Derya Y; Timur Taşhan S; Duman M; Durgun Ozan Y
    Midwifery; 2018 Jul; 62():61-68. PubMed ID: 29655006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Psychometric Assessment and Precision Remodeling of the Iowa Infant Feeding Attitude Scale to Improve Clinical Use and Efficacy Among Prenatal Women in Canada.
    AlKusayer NM; Midodzi WK; Newhook LA; Burrage L; Gill N; Halfyard B; Twells LK
    J Hum Lact; 2018 Feb; 34(1):20-29. PubMed ID: 29182888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Conditions of Work Effectiveness Questionnaire-II.
    Sun N; Li QJ; Lv DM; Lu GZ; Lin P; An XM
    J Nurs Manag; 2014 Oct; 22(7):848-54. PubMed ID: 23815636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Psychometric properties of a 20-item version of the Maternal-Fetal Attachment Scale in a sample of Italian expectant women.
    Busonera A; Cataudella S; Lampis J; Tommasi M; Zavattini GC
    Midwifery; 2016 Mar; 34():79-87. PubMed ID: 26803548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The breastfeeding self-efficacy scale-short form: Psychometric characteristics in Portuguese pregnant women.
    Brandão S; Mendonça D; Dias CC; Pinto TM; Dennis CL; Figueiredo B
    Midwifery; 2018 Nov; 66():49-55. PubMed ID: 30121478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Could the Food Neophobia Scale be adapted to pregnant women? A confirmatory factor analysis in a Portuguese sample.
    Paupério A; Severo M; Lopes C; Moreira P; Cooke L; Oliveira A
    Appetite; 2014 Apr; 75():110-6. PubMed ID: 24406850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development and psychometric testing of a new instrument to measure factors influencing women's breast cancer prevention behaviors (ASSISTS).
    Khazaee-Pool M; Majlessi F; Montazeri A; Pashaei T; Gholami A; Ponnet K
    BMC Womens Health; 2016 Jul; 16():40. PubMed ID: 27444675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pregnant women's attitudes and decision-making regarding prenatal Down syndrome screening and diagnosis: scale development and validation.
    Huang WH; Shih SF; Lin CL; Liu CH
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Jul; 20(1):407. PubMed ID: 32664895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development and psychometric testing of the Chinese version of the Resilience Scale for Southeast Asian immigrant women who divorced in Taiwan.
    Kuo SF; Hou WH; Chang CC; Liao YM; Cheng SY; Chou YH; Yeh YC; Lin YK; Chen IH
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0211451. PubMed ID: 30716088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The psychometric properties of the Iranian version of revised prenatal coping inventory (Nu PCI) in healthy pregnant women: a confirmatory factor analysis.
    Shobeiri F; Maleki A; Shamsaei F; Soltani F; Ahmadi F; Roshanaei G
    J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 Jun; 39(2):105-111. PubMed ID: 28437134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Psychometric and Linguistic Evaluation of a Coping Scale for Breast Cancer Survivors in Taiwan.
    Huang CY; Perng SJ; Chen CI; Lu CY
    Cancer Nurs; 2021 May-Jun 01; 44(3):E121-E130. PubMed ID: 32541205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Developing and validating a Taiwan version of the female sexual function index for pregnant women.
    Chang SR; Chang TC; Chen KH; Lin HH
    J Sex Med; 2009 Jun; 6(6):1609-1616. PubMed ID: 19473461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.
    Meng R; Li J; Wang Z; Zhang D; Liu B; Luo Y; Hu Y; Yu C
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2020 Mar; 18(1):70. PubMed ID: 32169070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Psychometric evaluation of the pregnancy-related anxiety questionnaire-revised 2 for Chinese pregnant women.
    Xie T; Han L; Wu J; Dai J; Fan X; Liu J; Liu Y; Bai J
    Midwifery; 2022 Sep; 112():103411. PubMed ID: 35779320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of the Chinese Version of the Australian Breastfeeding Attitude Questionnaire.
    Yang SF; Schmied V; Burns E; Brodribb W; Salamonson Y
    J Hum Lact; 2018 Nov; 34(4):674-681. PubMed ID: 29596756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Construct validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Disaster Preparedness Evaluation Tool in Taiwan.
    Chen TF; Chou KR; Liao YM; Ho CH; Chung MH
    J Clin Nurs; 2015 Apr; 24(7-8):1132-43. PubMed ID: 25441229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Examining Factor Structure and Validating the Persian Version of the Pregnancy's Worries and Stress Questionnaire for Pregnant Iranian Women.
    Navidpour F; Dolatian M; Yaghmaei F; Majd HA; Hashemi SS
    Glob J Health Sci; 2015 Apr; 7(6):308-18. PubMed ID: 26153186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.