These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

513 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30665055)

  • 1. Effects of scheduled manual driving on drowsiness and response to take over request: A simulator study towards understanding drivers in automated driving.
    Wu Y; Kihara K; Takeda Y; Sato T; Akamatsu M; Kitazaki S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Mar; 124():202-209. PubMed ID: 30665055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. From partial and high automation to manual driving: Relationship between non-driving related tasks, drowsiness and take-over performance.
    Naujoks F; Höfling S; Purucker C; Zeeb K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Dec; 121():28-42. PubMed ID: 30205284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Age-related differences in effects of non-driving related tasks on takeover performance in automated driving.
    Wu Y; Kihara K; Hasegawa K; Takeda Y; Sato T; Akamatsu M; Kitazaki S
    J Safety Res; 2020 Feb; 72():231-238. PubMed ID: 32199568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Asleep at the automated wheel-Sleepiness and fatigue during highly automated driving.
    Vogelpohl T; Kühn M; Hummel T; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 May; 126():70-84. PubMed ID: 29571975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of non-driving related tasks on the development of driver sleepiness and takeover performances in prolonged automated driving.
    Pan H; He H; Wang Y; Cheng Y; Dai Z
    J Safety Res; 2023 Sep; 86():148-163. PubMed ID: 37718042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Age-related differences in takeover performance: A comparative analysis of older and younger drivers in prolonged partially automated driving.
    Pan H; Payre W; Xu J; Koppel S
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2024; 25(7):968-975. PubMed ID: 38860883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sleep in highly automated driving: Takeover performance after waking up.
    Wörle J; Metz B; Othersen I; Baumann M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Sep; 144():105617. PubMed ID: 32540623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What determines the take-over time? An integrated model approach of driver take-over after automated driving.
    Zeeb K; Buchner A; Schrauf M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 May; 78():212-221. PubMed ID: 25794922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The monitoring requests on young driver's fatigue and take-over performance in prolonged conditional automated driving.
    Yin J; Shao H; Zhang X
    J Safety Res; 2024 Feb; 88():285-292. PubMed ID: 38485370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing drivers' response during automated driver support system failures with non-driving tasks.
    Shen S; Neyens DM
    J Safety Res; 2017 Jun; 61():149-155. PubMed ID: 28454860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Keeping the driver in the loop through semi-automated or manual lane changes in conditionally automated driving.
    Dillmann J; den Hartigh RJR; Kurpiers CM; Pelzer J; Raisch FK; Cox RFA; de Waard D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Nov; 162():106397. PubMed ID: 34563644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The detection of drowsiness using a driver monitoring system.
    Schwarz C; Gaspar J; Miller T; Yousefian R
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S157-S161. PubMed ID: 31381433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating driver drowsiness countermeasures.
    Gaspar JG; Brown TL; Schwarz CW; Lee JD; Kang J; Higgins JS
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 May; 18(sup1):S58-S63. PubMed ID: 28323444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effective cues for accelerating young drivers' time to transfer control following a period of conditional automation.
    Wright TJ; Agrawal R; Samuel S; Wang Y; Zilberstein S; Fisher DL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jul; 116():14-20. PubMed ID: 29031513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Eye blink detection for different driver states in conditionally automated driving and manual driving using EOG and a driver camera.
    Schmidt J; Laarousi R; Stolzmann W; Karrer-Gauß K
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Jun; 50(3):1088-1101. PubMed ID: 28718089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Highly automated driving, secondary task performance, and driver state.
    Merat N; Jamson AH; Lai FC; Carsten O
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):762-71. PubMed ID: 23156621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Age differences in the takeover of vehicle control and engagement in non-driving-related activities in simulated driving with conditional automation.
    Clark H; Feng J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Sep; 106():468-479. PubMed ID: 27686942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improvement of driver active interventions during automated driving by displaying trajectory pointers-A driving simulator study.
    Ono S; Sasaki H; Kumon H; Fuwamoto Y; Kondo S; Narumi T; Tanikawa T; Hirose M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S152-S156. PubMed ID: 31381449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Understanding take-over performance of high crash risk drivers during conditionally automated driving.
    Lin Q; Li S; Ma X; Lu G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Aug; 143():105543. PubMed ID: 32485431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of Task-Induced Fatigue in Prolonged Conditional Automated Driving.
    Jarosch O; Bellem H; Bengler K
    Hum Factors; 2019 Nov; 61(7):1186-1199. PubMed ID: 30657711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.