BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30666406)

  • 81. Prevalence of polyps ≥6 mm on follow-up CT colonography in a cohort with no significant colon polyps at baseline.
    Sosna J; Kettanie A; Fraifeld S; Bar-Ziv J; Carel RS
    Clin Imaging; 2019; 55():1-7. PubMed ID: 30690226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. Colon cancer: comprehensive evaluation with 64-section CT colonography using water enema as intraluminal contrast agent-a pictorial review.
    Soyer P; Hamzi L; Sirol M; Duchat F; Dray X; Hristova L; Placé V; Pocard M; Boudiaf M
    Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(2):113-25. PubMed ID: 22370132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. Detection of colonic masses with MR colonography.
    Haykir R; Karaköse S; Karabacakoğlu A; Kayaçetin E; Sahin M
    Turk J Gastroenterol; 2006 Sep; 17(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 16941252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. [New preoperative imaging and navigation systems for the treatment of colorectal cancer].
    Nagata K; Endo S; Kudo SE
    Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 2008 Mar; 109(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 18409587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. Diagnostic performance of
    Hotta M; Minamimoto R; Yano H; Gohda Y; Shuno Y
    Cancer Imaging; 2018 Jan; 18(1):4. PubMed ID: 29378659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. Computed tomography has low sensitivity for the diagnosis of early colon cancer.
    Lao IH; Chao H; Wang YJ; Mak CW; Tzeng WS; Wu RH; Chang ST; Fang JL
    Colorectal Dis; 2013 Jul; 15(7):807-11. PubMed ID: 23350992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. Computerized detection of colorectal masses in CT colonography based on fuzzy merging and wall-thickening analysis.
    Näppi JJ; Frimmel H; Dachman AH; Yoshida H
    Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):860-72. PubMed ID: 15125004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. Accuracy of preoperative T and N staging in colon cancer--a national population-based study.
    Sjövall A; Blomqvist L; Egenvall M; Johansson H; Martling A
    Colorectal Dis; 2016 Jan; 18(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 26291535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. Colorectal carcinomas: diagnosis and preoperative staging by hydrocolonic sonography.
    Hernández-Socorro CR; Guerra C; Hernández-Romero J; Rey A; López-Facal P; Alvarez-Santullano V
    Surgery; 1995 Jun; 117(6):609-15. PubMed ID: 7778024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. Oncologic outcomes of pathologic T4 and T3 colon cancer patients diagnosed with clinical T4 stage disease using preoperative computed tomography scan.
    Kim S; Huh JW; Lee WY; Yun SH; Kim HC; Cho YB; Park YA; Shin JK
    Surg Oncol; 2022 May; 41():101749. PubMed ID: 35358915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. Preoperative T and N staging of gastric cancer: magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) versus multi detector computed tomography (MDCT).
    Maccioni F; Marcelli G; Al Ansari N; Zippi M; De Marco V; Kagarmanova A; Vestri A; Marcheggiano-Clarke L; Marini M
    Clin Ter; 2010; 161(2):e57-62. PubMed ID: 20499021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. [Virtual CT colonoscopy and virtual CT barium enema using multidetector-row CT].
    Lee SJ
    Korean J Gastroenterol; 2006 Oct; 48(4):233-40. PubMed ID: 17060716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. Diagnostic accuracy of colorectal cancer staging with whole-body PET/CT colonography.
    Veit-Haibach P; Kuehle CA; Beyer T; Stergar H; Kuehl H; Schmidt J; Börsch G; Dahmen G; Barkhausen J; Bockisch A; Antoch G
    JAMA; 2006 Dec; 296(21):2590-600. PubMed ID: 17148724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. Performance comparison between MRI and CT for local staging of sigmoid and descending colon cancer.
    Liu LH; Lv H; Wang ZC; Rao SX; Zeng MS
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Dec; 121():108741. PubMed ID: 31743882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. Can the localization of primary colonic tumors be improved by staging CT without specific bowel preparation compared to optical colonoscopy?
    Feuerlein S; Grimm LJ; Davenport MS; Haystead CM; Miller CM; Neville AM; Jaffe TA
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Oct; 81(10):2538-42. PubMed ID: 22209431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. The efficacy of intravenous contrast-enhanced 16-raw multidetector CT colonography for detecting patients with colorectal polyps in an asymptomatic population in Korea.
    Kim YS; Kim N; Kim SH; Park MJ; Lim SH; Yim JY; Cho KR; Kim SS; Kim DH; Eun HW; Cho KS; Kim JH; Choi BI; Jung HC; Song IS; Shin CS; Cho SH; Oh BH
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2008 Aug; 42(7):791-8. PubMed ID: 18580500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. Virtual colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening: current status.
    Heiken JP; Peterson CM; Menias CO
    Cancer Imaging; 2005 Nov; 5 Spec No A(Spec No A):S133-9. PubMed ID: 16361129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. Staging of colonic neoplasms by colonoscopic miniprobe ultrasonography.
    Stergiou N; Haji-Kermani N; Schneider C; Menke D; Köckerling F; Wehrmann T
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2003 Sep; 18(5):445-9. PubMed ID: 12783253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. Preoperative segmental localization of colorectal carcinoma: CT colonography vs. optical colonoscopy.
    Offermans T; Vogelaar FJ; Aquarius M; Janssen-Heijnen MLG; Simons PCG
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Nov; 43(11):2105-2111. PubMed ID: 28965706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. Rectal cancer: comparison of accuracy of local-regional staging with two- and three-dimensional preoperative 3-T MR imaging.
    Kim H; Lim JS; Choi JY; Park J; Chung YE; Kim MJ; Choi E; Kim NK; Kim KW
    Radiology; 2010 Feb; 254(2):485-92. PubMed ID: 20093520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.