300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30667169)
1. Evaluation of the Marginal and Internal Fit of Implant-Supported Metal Copings Fabricated with 3 Different Techniques: An In Vitro Study.
Yildirim B; Paken G
J Prosthodont; 2019 Mar; 28(3):315-320. PubMed ID: 30667169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of manufacturing techniques on the marginal and internal fit of cobalt-chromium implant-supported multiunit frameworks.
Akçin ET; Güncü MB; Aktaş G; Aslan Y
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Nov; 120(5):715-720. PubMed ID: 30017153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of porcelain firing and cementation on the marginal fit of implant-supported metal-ceramic restorations fabricated by additive or subtractive manufacturing methods.
Yildirim B
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Oct; 124(4):476.e1-476.e6. PubMed ID: 32451142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical marginal and internal adaptation of CAD/CAM milling, laser sintering, and cast metal ceramic crowns.
Tamac E; Toksavul S; Toman M
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):909-13. PubMed ID: 24819532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of manufacturing technique on marginal fit of cobalt chromium restorations: An
Sarda AS; Bedia SV
Indian J Dent Res; 2021; 32(4):495-499. PubMed ID: 35645078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the fit of zirconia copings fabricated by direct and indirect digital scanning procedures.
Lee B; Oh KC; Haam D; Lee JH; Moon HS
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):225-231. PubMed ID: 29428522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of Anti-Rotational Abutment Features and Novel Computerized Fabrication Techniques on the Marginal Fit of Implant-Supported Metal Copings.
Aktas G; Guncu MB; Akcin ET; Cakan U; Canay S
J Prosthodont; 2021 Mar; 30(3):252-256. PubMed ID: 32964601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Effect of Milling Metal Versus Milling Wax on Implant Framework Retention and Adaptation.
Ghodsi S; Pirmoazen S; Beyabanaki E; Rostami M; Alikhasi M
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e739-e743. PubMed ID: 29855135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of production method on surface roughness, marginal and internal fit, and retention of cobalt-chromium single crowns.
Lövgren N; Roxner R; Klemendz S; Larsson C
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 28024818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the fit of metal copings fabricated using stereolithography.
Kim SB; Kim NH; Kim JH; Moon HS
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Nov; 120(5):693-698. PubMed ID: 29807735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of different finish line preparations on the marginal and internal adaptation of cobalt-chromium metal alloy copings fabricated by using CAD-CAM technology: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Shah N; Badwaik P; Sheth VH; Bhatnagar V; Bhanushali N; Patil P
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 May; 127(5):716-728.e6. PubMed ID: 34716012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of repeated ceramic firings on the marginal and internal adaptation of metal-ceramic restorations fabricated with different CAD-CAM technologies.
Kocaağaoğlu H; Albayrak H; Kilinc HI; Gümüs HÖ
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Nov; 118(5):672-677. PubMed ID: 28385435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A microcomputed tomography evaluation of the marginal fit of cobalt-chromium alloy copings fabricated by new manufacturing techniques and alloy systems.
Kim EH; Lee DH; Kwon SM; Kwon TY
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):393-399. PubMed ID: 27677219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of three-unit implant-supported fixed prosthetic substructures fabricated using CAD/CAM systems.
Kayikci O; Ates SM
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Feb; 26(2):1283-1291. PubMed ID: 34331593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of marginal fit of single implant-supported metal-ceramic crowns prepared by using presintered metal blocks.
Pasali B; Sarac D; Kaleli N; Sarac YS
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Feb; 119(2):257-262. PubMed ID: 28545869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16.
Gurel K; Toksavul S; Toman M; Tamac E
Niger J Clin Pract; 2019 Jun; 22(6):812-816. PubMed ID: 31187767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of marginal/internal fit of chrome-cobalt crowns: Direct laser metal sintering versus computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing.
Gunsoy S; Ulusoy M
Niger J Clin Pract; 2016; 19(5):636-44. PubMed ID: 27538553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical marginal and internal fit of metal ceramic crowns fabricated with a selective laser melting technology.
Huang Z; Zhang L; Zhu J; Zhang X
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):623-7. PubMed ID: 25794918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the Internal and Marginal Discrepancies of Co-Cr Metal Copings Prepared via CAD/CAM and Conventional Casting.
Dayan SC; Kiseri B; Gencel B; Kurt A
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2019 Feb; 27(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 30762994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison and evaluation of marginal and internal gaps in cobalt-chromium alloy copings fabricated using subtractive and additive manufacturing.
Kim DY; Kim JH; Kim HY; Kim WC
J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Jan; 62(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 28663024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
