These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30667481)

  • 1. State Preemption to Prevent Local Taxation of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages.
    Crosbie E; Schillinger D; Schmidt LA
    JAMA Intern Med; 2019 Mar; 179(3):291-292. PubMed ID: 30667481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sugar-sweetened beverage taxation in 2017: a commentary on the reasons behind their quick spread in the EU compared with the USA.
    Hagenaars LL; Jeurissen PP; Klazinga NS
    Public Health Nutr; 2019 Jan; 22(1):186-189. PubMed ID: 30168400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. State Preemption: An Emerging Threat to Local Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxation.
    Crosbie E; Pomeranz JL; Wright KE; Hoeper S; Schmidt L
    Am J Public Health; 2021 Apr; 111(4):677-686. PubMed ID: 33600243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Use of Excise Taxes to Reduce Tobacco, Alcohol, and Sugary Beverage Consumption.
    Chaloupka FJ; Powell LM; Warner KE
    Annu Rev Public Health; 2019 Apr; 40():187-201. PubMed ID: 30601721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sugar-sweetened beverage taxes: Lessons to date and the future of taxation.
    Popkin BM; Ng SW
    PLoS Med; 2021 Jan; 18(1):e1003412. PubMed ID: 33411708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Political and public acceptability of a sugar-sweetened beverages tax: a mixed-method systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Eykelenboom M; van Stralen MM; Olthof MR; Schoonmade LJ; Steenhuis IHM; Renders CM;
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2019 Sep; 16(1):78. PubMed ID: 31484538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of an excise tax on the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages in young people living in poorer neighbourhoods of Catalonia, Spain: a difference in differences study.
    Royo-Bordonada MÁ; Fernández-Escobar C; Simón L; Sanz-Barbero B; Padilla J
    BMC Public Health; 2019 Nov; 19(1):1553. PubMed ID: 31752787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contradictions within the SDGs: are sin taxes for health improvement at odds with employment and economic growth in Zambia.
    Hangoma P; Surgey G
    Global Health; 2019 Dec; 15(1):82. PubMed ID: 31847871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Designing better sugary drink taxes.
    Grummon AH; Lockwood BB; Taubinsky D; Allcott H
    Science; 2019 Sep; 365(6457):989-990. PubMed ID: 31488678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sugar-sweetened beverage taxation in the USA, state preemption of local efforts.
    Pomeranz JL; Pertschuk M
    Public Health Nutr; 2019 Jan; 22(1):190. PubMed ID: 30419994
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax Preemption and the Urgency of Unified Mobilization.
    Falbe J; Adler SS; Roberto CA
    Am J Public Health; 2021 Apr; 111(4):546-548. PubMed ID: 33689430
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The American Dental Association should support sweetened beverage taxation.
    Feldman L
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2021 Nov; 152(11):883-885. PubMed ID: 34482946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The caloric and sugar content of beverages purchased at different store-types changed after the sugary drinks taxation in Mexico.
    Pedraza LS; Popkin BM; Batis C; Adair L; Robinson WR; Guilkey DK; Taillie LS
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2019 Nov; 16(1):103. PubMed ID: 31718664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxation: Evidence-Based Policy and Industry Preemption.
    Falbe J
    Am J Public Health; 2019 Feb; 109(2):191-192. PubMed ID: 30649932
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Taxation and Sugar-Sweetened Beverages: Position of Dietitians of Canada.
    Can J Diet Pract Res; 2016 Jun; 77(2):110. PubMed ID: 27183052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A call to action: advocating for the integration of oral health promotion and public health via sugar sweetened beverage taxation.
    Bridge G; Lomazzi M; Bedi R
    Br Dent J; 2019 Oct; 227(8):663-664. PubMed ID: 31653997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Expanding our understanding of industry opposition to help implement sugar-sweetened beverage taxation.
    Crosbie E; Florence D
    Public Health Nutr; 2022 Jan; 25(1):180-182. PubMed ID: 34218841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Chile's 2014 sugar-sweetened beverage tax and changes in prices and purchases of sugar-sweetened beverages: An observational study in an urban environment.
    Caro JC; Corvalán C; Reyes M; Silva A; Popkin B; Taillie LS
    PLoS Med; 2018 Jul; 15(7):e1002597. PubMed ID: 29969444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Society of Behavioral Medicine (SBM) position statement: Enact taxes on sugar sweetened beverages to prevent chronic disease.
    Taber DR; Dulin-Keita A; Fallon M; Chaloupka FJ; Andreyeva T; Schwartz MB; Harris JL
    Transl Behav Med; 2019 Jan; 9(1):179-183. PubMed ID: 29648617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Potential for Federal Preemption of State and Local Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxes.
    Pomeranz JL; Mozaffarian D; Micha R
    Am J Prev Med; 2017 Nov; 53(5):740-743. PubMed ID: 28864129
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.