These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3066806)

  • 1. Marginal fracture of posterior composite resins.
    Fukushima M; Setcos JC; Phillips RW
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1988 Oct; 117(5):577-83. PubMed ID: 3066806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical longevity of extensive direct composite restorations in amalgam replacement: up to 3.5 years follow-up.
    Scholtanus JD; Ozcan M
    J Dent; 2014 Nov; 42(11):1404-10. PubMed ID: 24994619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Marginal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in Class II conservative preparations.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2001 May; 32(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 11444073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations.
    Stavridakis MM; Kakaboura AI; Ardu S; Krejci I
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite resin restorations: 8-year findings.
    Collins CJ; Bryant RW; Hodge KL
    J Dent; 1998 May; 26(4):311-7. PubMed ID: 9611936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cusp fracture resistance in composite-amalgam combined restorations.
    Franchi M; Breschi L; Ruggeri O
    J Dent; 1999 Jan; 27(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 9922612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Black or white--Which choice for the molars? Part 2. Which does one choose for the restoration of posterior teeth: amalgam or composite?].
    De Moor R; Delmé K
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2008; 63(4):135-46. PubMed ID: 19227687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scanning electron microscope study of the junction between restorations and gingival cavosurface margins.
    Saltzberg DS; Ceravolo FJ; Holstein F; Groom G; Gottsegen R
    J Prosthet Dent; 1976 Nov; 36(5):517-22. PubMed ID: 1068287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Benefits and disadvantages of tooth-coloured alternatives to amalgam.
    Roulet JF
    J Dent; 1997 Nov; 25(6):459-73. PubMed ID: 9604577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An evaluation of marginal leakage of Class 2 combined amalgam-composite restorations.
    Eidelman E; Holan G; Tanzer-Sarneh S; Chosack A
    Oper Dent; 1990; 15(4):141-8. PubMed ID: 2216907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An in vitro assessment of cavity margin finishing and marginal adaptation of tunnel restorations.
    Chalker SA; Lumley PJ
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1993 Jun; 1(4):151-6. PubMed ID: 8268839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marginal leakage of compacted gold, composite resin, and high-copper amalgam restorations.
    Hormati AA; Chan KC
    J Prosthet Dent; 1980 Oct; 44(4):418-22. PubMed ID: 6997471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro study of enamel and dentin marginal integrity of composite and compomer restorations placed in primary teeth after diamond or Er:YAG laser cavity preparation.
    Stiesch-Scholz M; Hannig M
    J Adhes Dent; 2000; 2(3):213-22. PubMed ID: 11317395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microleakage and enamel finish.
    Khera SC; Chan KC
    J Prosthet Dent; 1978 Apr; 39(4):414-9. PubMed ID: 273692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reducing marginal leakage of posterior composite resin restorations: a review of clinical techniques.
    Cheung GS
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Mar; 63(3):286-8. PubMed ID: 2407825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-year clinical evaluation of cuspal coverage with combined composite-amalgam in endodontically-treated maxillary premolars.
    Shafiei F; Memarpour M; Doozandeh M
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):599-604. PubMed ID: 21179997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors relating to usage patterns of amalgam and resin composite for posterior restorations--a prospective analysis.
    Khalaf ME; Alomari QD; Omar R
    J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):785-92. PubMed ID: 24769386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.