These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3066808)

  • 1. Clinical recommendations for the use of D-speed film, E-speed film, and xeroradiography.
    Gratt BM; White SC; Halse A
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1988 Oct; 117(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 3066808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A subjective study of dental diagnostic utility comparing xeroradiography and film radiography.
    Gratt BM; White SC; Sickles EA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Nov; 68(5):653-60. PubMed ID: 2812719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of a "sandwich" technique to control image geometry in clinical studies comparing intraoral xeroradiographs and E-speed films.
    Ludlow JB; Hill RA; Hayes CJ
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 May; 65(5):618-25. PubMed ID: 3163790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative evaluation of the sensitometric properties of screen-film systems and conventional dental receptors for intraoral radiography.
    Kircos LT; Staninec M; Chou L
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Dec; 68(6):787-92. PubMed ID: 2594331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A cost analysis comparing xeroradiography to film technics for intraoral radiography.
    Gratt BM; Sickles EA
    J Public Health Dent; 1986; 46(2):96-105. PubMed ID: 3457953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radiographic quality control measurements comparing D-speed film, E-speed film, and xeroradiography.
    Diehl R; Gratt BM; Gould RG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Jun; 61(6):635-40. PubMed ID: 3459995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A clinical comparison of xeroradiography and film radiography for the detection of proximal caries.
    White SC; Gratt BM; Bauer JG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 Feb; 65(2):242-8. PubMed ID: 3422729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Imaging properties of intraoral dental xeroradiography.
    Gratt BM; White SC; Sickles EA; Jeromin LS
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1979 Nov; 99(5):805-9. PubMed ID: 290676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Panoramic radiography in dental diagnostics.
    Molander B
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1996; 119():1-26. PubMed ID: 8971997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Xeroradiography of dental structures. I. Preliminary investigations.
    Gratt BM; Sickles EA; Parks CP
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1977 Jul; 44(1):148-52. PubMed ID: 267873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exposure times at which dental xeroradiographs and radiographs have comparable optical density.
    Alexander JB; Andrews JD
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 Sep; 66(3):359-64. PubMed ID: 3174071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A clinical comparison between xeroradiography and film radiography for the detection of recurrent caries.
    Gratt BM; White SC; Bauer JG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 Apr; 65(4):483-9. PubMed ID: 3163139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical trials of intraoral dental xeroradiography.
    White SC; Gratt BM
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1979 Nov; 99(5):810-6. PubMed ID: 385665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Duplication of dental xeroradiographs.
    Gratt BM; Sickles EA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1981 Oct; 52(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 6946370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of dental xeroradiographs in periodontics. Comparison with conventional radiographs.
    Gratt BM; Sickles EA; Armitage GC
    J Periodontol; 1980 Jan; 51(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 6928465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability of CCD and CMOS (APS) digital sensors compared with D and E-plus-speed films in the detection of dental pathology: an in vitro study.
    Tsau JN; Mupparapu M
    Penn Dent J (Phila); 2001; 101():10-1. PubMed ID: 15484636
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Exposure reduction of 96% in intraoral radiography.
    Kircos LT; Vandre RH; Lorton L
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1986 Nov; 113(5):746-50. PubMed ID: 3465788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of xeroradiographs with occlusal and screen films.
    Thunthy KH
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1978 Jun; 45(6):959-64. PubMed ID: 277860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of Niobi-X filtration in intraoral radiology.
    White SC; Gratt BM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Dec; 72(6):746-55. PubMed ID: 1812457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Applications of xeroradiography in dentistry-a review.
    Binnie WH; Cawson RA; Davis R; Stacey AJ
    Int Dent J; 1979 Mar; 29(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 283997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.