These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30668710)

  • 1. Test-retest reliability of the Welfare Quality Assessment protocol for pigs applied to sows and piglets. Part 2. Assessment of the principles good feeding, good housing, and good health1.
    Friedrich L; Krieter J; Kemper N; Czycholl I
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Mar; 97(3):1143-1157. PubMed ID: 30668710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measuring welfare in rearing piglets: test-retest reliability of selected animal-based indicators.
    Witt J; Krieter J; Wilder T; Czycholl I
    J Anim Sci; 2023 Jan; 101():. PubMed ID: 37209717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Feasibility and reliability of a German guideline for farm's self-monitoring in sows and piglets.
    Friedrich L; Krieter J; Kemper N; Czycholl I
    J Anim Sci; 2020 Oct; 98(10):. PubMed ID: 32926161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Test-Retest Reliability of the 'Welfare Quality
    Friedrich L; Krieter J; Kemper N; Czycholl I
    Animals (Basel); 2019 Jun; 9(7):. PubMed ID: 31261972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Short communication: Evaluation of the sample size of individual indicators in gestating sows concerning the Welfare Quality® protocol applied to sows and piglets.
    Friedrich L; Krieter J; Kemper N; Czycholl I
    Animal; 2020 Jun; 14(6):1278-1282. PubMed ID: 31937377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability of the qualitative behavior assessment as included in the Welfare Quality Assessment protocol for growing pigs.
    Czycholl I; Beilage EG; Henning C; Krieter J
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Aug; 95(8):3445-3454. PubMed ID: 28805930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inter- and intra-observer reliability of animal welfare indicators for the on-farm self-assessment of fattening pigs.
    Pfeifer M; Eggemann L; Kransmann J; Schmitt AO; Hessel EF
    Animal; 2019 Aug; 13(8):1712-1720. PubMed ID: 30630538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interobserver Reliability of the Animal Welfare Indicators Welfare Assessment Protocol for Horses.
    Czycholl I; Klingbeil P; Krieter J
    J Equine Vet Sci; 2019 Apr; 75():112-121. PubMed ID: 31002084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Invited review: Animal-based indicators for on-farm welfare assessment for dairy goats.
    Battini M; Vieira A; Barbieri S; Ajuda I; Stilwell G; Mattiello S
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Nov; 97(11):6625-48. PubMed ID: 25242423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The welfare and productivity of dry sows in different group housing systems in New Zealand.
    Chidgey KL; Morel PC; Barugh IW
    J Appl Anim Welf Sci; 2013; 16(2):150-67. PubMed ID: 23544755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On-farm evaluation of methods to assess welfare of gestating sows.
    Conte S; Bergeron R; Grégoire J; Gète M; D'Allaire S; Meunier-Salaün MC; Devillers N
    Animal; 2014 Jul; 8(7):1153-61. PubMed ID: 24762801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors associated with specific health, welfare and reproductive performance indicators in pig herds from five EU countries.
    Chantziaras I; Dewulf J; Van Limbergen T; Klinkenberg M; Palzer A; Pineiro C; Aarestrup Moustsen V; Niemi J; Kyriazakis I; Maes D
    Prev Vet Med; 2018 Nov; 159():106-114. PubMed ID: 30314772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tear staining in pigs: a potential tool for welfare assessment on commercial farms.
    Telkänranta H; Marchant JN; Valros A
    Animal; 2016 Feb; 10(2):318-25. PubMed ID: 26303891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interobserver reliability of the 'Welfare Quality(®) Animal Welfare Assessment Protocol for Growing Pigs'.
    Czycholl I; Kniese C; Büttner K; Beilage EG; Schrader L; Krieter J
    Springerplus; 2016; 5(1):1114. PubMed ID: 27478731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On-farm animal welfare assessment in beef bulls: consistency over time of single measures and aggregated Welfare Quality(®) scores.
    Kirchner MK; Schulze Westerath H; Knierim U; Tessitore E; Cozzi G; Winckler C
    Animal; 2014 Mar; 8(3):461-9. PubMed ID: 24330803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of group housing on reproductive performance, lameness, injuries and saliva cortisol in gestating sows.
    Morgan L; Klement E; Novak S; Eliahoo E; Younis A; Abells Sutton G; Abu-Ahmad W; Raz T
    Prev Vet Med; 2018 Nov; 160():10-17. PubMed ID: 30388991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The welfare of growing pigs in five different production systems: assessment of feeding and housing.
    Temple D; Courboulay V; Manteca X; Velarde A; Dalmau A
    Animal; 2012 Apr; 6(4):656-67. PubMed ID: 22436283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do nurse sows and foster litters have impaired animal welfare? Results from a cross-sectional study in sow herds.
    Sørensen JT; Rousing T; Kudahl AB; Hansted HJ; Pedersen LJ
    Animal; 2016 Apr; 10(4):681-6. PubMed ID: 26490696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A field study on group housing of lactating sows with special reference to sow health at weaning.
    Hultén F; Lundeheim N; Dalin AM; Einarsson S
    Acta Vet Scand; 1995; 36(2):201-12. PubMed ID: 7484547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An Indication of Reliability of the Two-Level Approach of the AWIN Welfare Assessment Protocol for Horses.
    Czycholl I; Büttner K; Klingbeil P; Krieter J
    Animals (Basel); 2018 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 29303962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.