These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30668806)

  • 1. Performance of whole genome prediction for growth traits in a crossbred chicken population.
    Teng J; Gao N; Zhang H; Li X; Li J; Zhang H; Zhang X; Zhang Z
    Poult Sci; 2019 May; 98(5):1968-1975. PubMed ID: 30668806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genomic clustering helps to improve prediction in a multibreed population.
    Ventura R; Larmer S; Schenkel FS; Miller SP; Sullivan P
    J Anim Sci; 2016 May; 94(5):1844-56. PubMed ID: 27285682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genomic dissection and prediction of feed intake and residual feed intake traits using a longitudinal model in F2 chickens.
    Emamgholi Begli H; Vaez Torshizi R; Masoudi AA; Ehsani A; Jensen J
    Animal; 2018 Sep; 12(9):1792-1798. PubMed ID: 29268803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of the genomic prediction accuracy for feed efficiency traits in meat-type chickens.
    Liu T; Luo C; Wang J; Ma J; Shu D; Lund MS; Su G; Qu H
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0173620. PubMed ID: 28278209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Whole-genome sequence-based genomic prediction in laying chickens with different genomic relationship matrices to account for genetic architecture.
    Ni G; Cavero D; Fangmann A; Erbe M; Simianer H
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jan; 49(1):8. PubMed ID: 28093063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of genomic prediction when combining two related crossbred populations.
    Vallée A; van Arendonk JA; Bovenhuis H
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Oct; 92(10):4342-8. PubMed ID: 25149337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of genomic information to exploit genotype-by-environment interactions for body weight of broiler chicken in bio-secure and production environments.
    Chu TT; Bastiaansen JWM; Berg P; Romé H; Marois D; Henshall J; Jensen J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Sep; 51(1):50. PubMed ID: 31533614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of Predicted Genomic Breeding Values in Purebred and Crossbred Pigs.
    Hidalgo AM; Bastiaansen JW; Lopes MS; Harlizius B; Groenen MA; de Koning DJ
    G3 (Bethesda); 2015 May; 5(8):1575-83. PubMed ID: 26019187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of bagging GBLUP for whole-genome prediction of broiler chicken traits.
    Abdollahi-Arpanahi R; Morota G; Valente BD; Kranis A; Rosa GJ; Gianola D
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2015 Jun; 132(3):218-28. PubMed ID: 25727456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of genome-enabled prediction exploring purebred and crossbred pig populations.
    Veroneze R; Lopes MS; Hidalgo AM; Guimarães SE; Silva FF; Harlizius B; Lopes PS; Knol EF; M van Arendonk JA; Bastiaansen JW
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Oct; 93(10):4684-91. PubMed ID: 26523561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Linkage disequilibrium in crossbred and pure line chickens.
    Fu W; Dekkers JC; Lee WR; Abasht B
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):11. PubMed ID: 25887184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing genomic prediction accuracy from purebred, crossbred and combined purebred and crossbred reference populations in sheep.
    Moghaddar N; Swan AA; van der Werf JH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Sep; 46(1):58. PubMed ID: 25927315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prediction of the reliability of genomic breeding values for crossbred performance.
    Vandenplas J; Windig JJ; Calus MPL
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 May; 49(1):43. PubMed ID: 28499351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genomic evaluation of feed efficiency component traits in Duroc pigs using 80K, 650K and whole-genome sequence variants.
    Zhang C; Kemp RA; Stothard P; Wang Z; Boddicker N; Krivushin K; Dekkers J; Plastow G
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Apr; 50(1):14. PubMed ID: 29625549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genomic prediction in a nuclear population of layers using single-step models.
    Yan Y; Wu G; Liu A; Sun C; Han W; Li G; Yang N
    Poult Sci; 2018 Feb; 97(2):397-402. PubMed ID: 29140467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genome-wide association study identified a narrow chromosome 1 region associated with chicken growth traits.
    Xie L; Luo C; Zhang C; Zhang R; Tang J; Nie Q; Ma L; Hu X; Li N; Da Y; Zhang X
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(2):e30910. PubMed ID: 22359555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Systematic differences in the response of genetic variation to pedigree and genome-based selection methods.
    Heidaritabar M; Vereijken A; Muir WM; Meuwissen T; Cheng H; Megens HJ; Groenen MA; Bastiaansen JW
    Heredity (Edinb); 2014 Dec; 113(6):503-13. PubMed ID: 25074573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of allele frequencies, effect sizes and number of markers on prediction of quantitative traits in chickens.
    Abdollahi-Arpanahi R; Nejati-Javaremi A; Pakdel A; Moradi-Shahrbabak M; Morota G; Valente BD; Kranis A; Rosa GJ; Gianola D
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2014 Apr; 131(2):123-33. PubMed ID: 24397350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of prediction of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake and carcass and meat quality traits in Bos taurus, Bos indicus, and composite beef cattle.
    Bolormaa S; Pryce JE; Kemper K; Savin K; Hayes BJ; Barendse W; Zhang Y; Reich CM; Mason BA; Bunch RJ; Harrison BE; Reverter A; Herd RM; Tier B; Graser HU; Goddard ME
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Jul; 91(7):3088-104. PubMed ID: 23658330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in crossbred beef cattle.
    Mujibi FD; Nkrumah JD; Durunna ON; Stothard P; Mah J; Wang Z; Basarab J; Plastow G; Crews DH; Moore SS
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Nov; 89(11):3353-61. PubMed ID: 21642493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.