These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30668806)

  • 21. [Gene differential expression of liver tissues in crossbred versus purebred chicken and their relationship with heterosis of meat trait].
    Wang D; Zhang Y; Sun DX; Yu Y; Xu GY; Li JY
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2004 Mar; 31(3):257-64. PubMed ID: 15195564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Accuracy of genomic prediction using imputed whole-genome sequence data in white layers.
    Heidaritabar M; Calus MP; Megens HJ; Vereijken A; Groenen MA; Bastiaansen JW
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2016 Jun; 133(3):167-79. PubMed ID: 26776363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A crossbred reference population can improve the response to genomic selection for crossbred performance.
    Esfandyari H; Sørensen AC; Bijma P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Sep; 47():76. PubMed ID: 26419430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Persistency of accuracy of genomic breeding values for different simulated pig breeding programs in developing countries.
    Akanno EC; Schenkel FS; Sargolzaei M; Friendship RM; Robinson JA
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2014 Oct; 131(5):367-78. PubMed ID: 24628765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An efficient unified model for genome-wide association studies and genomic selection.
    Li H; Su G; Jiang L; Bao Z
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Aug; 49(1):64. PubMed ID: 28836943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Accuracy of genomic prediction for milk production traits in the Chinese Holstein population using a reference population consisting of cows.
    Ding X; Zhang Z; Li X; Wang S; Wu X; Sun D; Yu Y; Liu J; Wang Y; Zhang Y; Zhang S; Zhang Y; Zhang Q
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Aug; 96(8):5315-23. PubMed ID: 23746588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Predictive assessment of single-step BLUP with linear and non-linear similarity RKHS kernels: A case study in chickens.
    Momen M; Kranis A; Rosa GJM; Muir P; Gianola D
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2022 May; 139(3):247-258. PubMed ID: 34931377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Accuracy of whole-genome prediction using a genetic architecture-enhanced variance-covariance matrix.
    Zhang Z; Erbe M; He J; Ober U; Gao N; Zhang H; Simianer H; Li J
    G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Feb; 5(4):615-27. PubMed ID: 25670771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Accuracy of genomic prediction using deregressed breeding values estimated from purebred and crossbred offspring phenotypes in pigs.
    Hidalgo AM; Bastiaansen JW; Lopes MS; Veroneze R; Groenen MA; de Koning DJ
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Jul; 93(7):3313-21. PubMed ID: 26440000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A predictive assessment of genetic correlations between traits in chickens using markers.
    Momen M; Mehrgardi AA; Sheikhy A; Esmailizadeh A; Fozi MA; Kranis A; Valente BD; Rosa GJ; Gianola D
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Feb; 49(1):16. PubMed ID: 28148241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of breeding objectives for purebred and crossbred selection schemes for adoption in indigenous chicken breeding programmes.
    Okeno TO; Kahi AK; Peters KJ
    Br Poult Sci; 2013; 54(1):62-75. PubMed ID: 23444855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Benefits of testing in both bio-secure and production environments in genomic selection breeding programs for commercial broiler chicken.
    Chu TT; Alemu SW; Norberg E; Sørensen AC; Henshall J; Hawken R; Jensen J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Nov; 50(1):52. PubMed ID: 30390619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Genomic prediction based on data from three layer lines: a comparison between linear methods.
    Calus MP; Huang H; Vereijken A; Visscher J; Ten Napel J; Windig JJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Oct; 46(1):57. PubMed ID: 25927219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of the Efficiency of BLUP and GBLUP in Genomic Prediction of Immune Traits in Chickens.
    Zhang J; Wang J; Li Q; Wang Q; Wen J; Zhao G
    Animals (Basel); 2020 Mar; 10(3):. PubMed ID: 32138151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Genomic predictions can accelerate selection for resistance against Piscirickettsia salmonis in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar).
    Bangera R; Correa K; Lhorente JP; Figueroa R; Yáñez JM
    BMC Genomics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):121. PubMed ID: 28143402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Pedigree and genomic evaluation of pigs using a terminal-cross model.
    Tusell L; Gilbert H; Riquet J; Mercat MJ; Legarra A; Larzul C
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Apr; 48():32. PubMed ID: 27056443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Genomic predictions for economically important traits in Brazilian Braford and Hereford beef cattle using true and imputed genotypes.
    Piccoli ML; Brito LF; Braccini J; Cardoso FF; Sargolzaei M; Schenkel FS
    BMC Genet; 2017 Jan; 18(1):2. PubMed ID: 28100165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Whole genomic prediction of growth and carcass traits in a Chinese quality chicken population.
    Zhang Z; Xu ZQ; Luo YY; Zhang HB; Gao N; He JL; Ji CL; Zhang DX; Li JQ; Zhang XQ
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Jan; 95(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 28177394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Accuracy of Genomic Prediction for Foliar Terpene Traits in
    Kainer D; Stone EA; Padovan A; Foley WJ; Külheim C
    G3 (Bethesda); 2018 Jul; 8(8):2573-2583. PubMed ID: 29891736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A new chicken 55K SNP genotyping array.
    Liu R; Xing S; Wang J; Zheng M; Cui H; Crooijmans RPMA; Li Q; Zhao G; Wen J
    BMC Genomics; 2019 May; 20(1):410. PubMed ID: 31117951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.