These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30668891)

  • 1. Negative predictive value and sensitivity of urine cytology prior to implementation of The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology.
    McIntire PJ; Khan R; Hussain H; Pambuccian SE; Wojcik EM; Barkan GA
    Cancer Cytopathol; 2019 Feb; 127(2):125-131. PubMed ID: 30668891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology reduces atypia rates and does not alter the negative predictive value of urine cytology.
    McIntire PJ; Kilic I; Pambuccian SE; Wojcik EM; Barkan GA
    J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2021; 10(1):14-19. PubMed ID: 33221245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Paris System for urine cytology in upper tract urothelial specimens: A comparative analysis with biopsy and surgical resection.
    Zheng X; Si Q; Du D; Harshan M; Zhang Z; Haines K; Shi W; Chhieng DC
    Cytopathology; 2018 Apr; 29(2):184-188. PubMed ID: 29251368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the Implementation and Diagnostic Accuracy of the Paris Classification for Reporting Urinary Cytology in Voided Urine Specimens: A Cyto-Histological Correlation Study in a Cancer Center.
    Lobo J; Lobo C; Leça L; Rodrigues Â; Henrique R; Monteiro P
    Pathobiology; 2023; 90(4):233-240. PubMed ID: 36574757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An institutional experience with The Paris System: A paradigm shift from ambiguous terminology to more objective criteria for reporting urine cytology.
    Roy M; Kaushal S; Jain D; Seth A; Iyer VK; Mathur SR
    Cytopathology; 2017 Dec; 28(6):509-515. PubMed ID: 28833848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Outcome analysis and negative predictive value of the "unsatisfactory/nondiagnostic" category of The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology.
    Abro S; Nomani L; Wojcik EM; Pambuccian SE; Chatt G; Barkan GA
    J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2021; 10(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 33279453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital image analysis supports a nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratio cutoff value below 0.7 for positive for high-grade urothelial carcinoma and suspicious for high-grade urothelial carcinoma in urine cytology specimens.
    McIntire PJ; Snow JT; Elsoukkary SS; Soong L; Sweeney J; Robinson BD; Siddiqui MT
    Cancer Cytopathol; 2019 Feb; 127(2):120-124. PubMed ID: 30395388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cytohistological correlation of urine cytology in a tertiary centre with application of the Paris system.
    Rohilla M; Singh P; Rajwanshi A; Gupta N; Srinivasan R; Dey P; Kakkar N
    Cytopathology; 2018 Oct; 29(5):436-443. PubMed ID: 29920811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Two-year study on the application of the Paris system for urinary cytology in a cancer centre.
    de Paula R; Oliveira A; Nunes W; Bovolim G; Domingos T; De Brot L; Bezerra S; Cunha I; Morini M; Saieg M
    Cytopathology; 2020 Jan; 31(1):41-46. PubMed ID: 31654587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Causes of false-negative for high-grade urothelial carcinoma in urine cytology.
    Lee PJ; Owens CL; Lithgow MY; Jiang Z; Fischer AH
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2016 Dec; 44(12):994-999. PubMed ID: 27781412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [A real-world study of the clinical application of the Paris system for reporting urinary cytology in cancer hospital].
    Zhao H; Zhang ZH; Guo HQ; Wei N; Ma HY; Zhao LL; Sun Y; Wang C; Chang XX; Bi XG; Xing NZ
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2024 Jul; 46(7):703-709. PubMed ID: 39034806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Atypical Category of the Johns Hopkins Template Has Higher Risk of Malignancy than the Paris System but the Paris System Is More Applicable for Suspicious Category.
    Celik B; Kavas G
    Acta Cytol; 2023; 67(4):425-433. PubMed ID: 36731438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Paris System for reporting urinary cytology in daily practice with emphasis on ancillary testing by multiprobe FISH.
    Vlajnic T; Gut A; Savic S; Bubendorf L
    J Clin Pathol; 2020 Feb; 73(2):90-95. PubMed ID: 31467041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Paris System for reporting urinary cytology improves the negative predictive value of high-grade urothelial carcinoma.
    Yamasaki M; Taoka R; Katakura K; Matsunaga T; Kani N; Honda T; Harada S; Tohi Y; Matsuoka Y; Kato T; Okazoe H; Tsunemori H; Ueda N; Haba R; Sugimoto M
    BMC Urol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):51. PubMed ID: 35382830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Split-sample comparison of urothelial cells in ThinPrep and cytospin preparations in urinary cytology: Do we need to adjust The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology criteria?
    Richardson CJ; Pambuccian SE; Barkan GA
    Cancer Cytopathol; 2020 Feb; 128(2):119-125. PubMed ID: 31774630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improved correlation of urinary cytology specimens using The Paris System in biopsy-proven upper tract urothelial carcinomas.
    McIntire PJ; Snow JT; Robinson BD; Rao RA; Goyal A; Heymann JJ; Siddiqui MT
    Cancer Cytopathol; 2018 Jul; 126(7):498-504. PubMed ID: 29927548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of the Paris system for reporting urinary cytology with histologic follow-up.
    Rohra P; Ocampo Gonzalez FA; Yan L; Mir F; Furlan K; Basu S; Barua A; Cheng L; Park JW
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2021 Jun; 49(6):691-699. PubMed ID: 33600080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Implementation of The Paris System for Reporting Urine Cytology improves diagnostic accuracy of selective upper urinary tract cytology.
    Miyai K; Nakayama M; Minabe S; Ogata S; Ito K; Matsukuma S
    Cancer Cytopathol; 2024 Apr; 132(4):242-249. PubMed ID: 38294961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Digital image analysis supports a nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratio cutoff value of 0.5 for atypical urothelial cells.
    Hang JF; Charu V; Zhang ML; VandenBussche CJ
    Cancer Cytopathol; 2017 Sep; 125(9):710-716. PubMed ID: 28581671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Application of the Paris Reporting System for Urine Cytology: The Three-Year Experience of a Single Tertiary Care Institute in Thailand.
    Phruttinarakorn B; Plumworasawat S; Kayankarnnavee J; Lualon J; Pongtippan A
    Acta Cytol; 2022; 66(2):134-141. PubMed ID: 34999581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.