These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30669172)

  • 21. The St Jude Medical Trifecta aortic pericardial valve: results from a global, multicenter, prospective clinical study.
    Bavaria JE; Desai ND; Cheung A; Petracek MR; Groh MA; Borger MA; Schaff HV
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Feb; 147(2):590-7. PubMed ID: 23477687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Rapid Deployment Versus Conventional Bioprosthetic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis.
    Ensminger S; Fujita B; Bauer T; Möllmann H; Beckmann A; Bekeredjian R; Bleiziffer S; Landwehr S; Hamm CW; Mohr FW; Katus HA; Harringer W; Walther T; Frerker C;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2018 Apr; 71(13):1417-1428. PubMed ID: 29598861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Early hemodynamic evaluation of Trifecta and Freestyle bioprostheses in patients with a small aortic root: preliminary results from a prospective randomized study.
    Tasca G; Stefano A; Giannico F; Lobiati E; Riva B; Galanti A; Triggiani M; Gamba A
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2014 Sep; 23(5):633-41. PubMed ID: 25799714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. North American single-center experience with a sutureless aortic bioprosthesis.
    de Varennes B; Lachapelle K; Cecere R; Szczepkowski I; Buithieu J
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Mar; 151(3):735-742. PubMed ID: 26621319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Clinical and echocardiographic outcomes after implantation of the Trifecta aortic bioprosthesis: an initial single-centre experience.
    Dell'Aquila AM; Schlarb D; Schneider SR; Sindermann JR; Hoffmeier A; Kaleschke G; Martens S; Rukosujew A
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2013 Feb; 16(2):112-5. PubMed ID: 23159508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sutureless versus Stented Bioprostheses for Aortic Valve Replacement: The Randomized PERSIST-AVR Study Design.
    Lorusso R; Folliguet T; Shrestha M; Meuris B; Kappetein AP; Roselli E; Klersy C; Nozza M; Verhees L; Larracas C; Goisis G; Fischlein T
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2020 Mar; 68(2):114-123. PubMed ID: 30497085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Do differences in early hemodynamic performance of current generation biologic aortic valves predict outcomes 1 year following surgery?
    Thalji NM; Suri RM; Michelena HI; Greason KL; Dearani JA; Daly RC; Joyce LD; Stulak JM; Burkhart HM; Li Z; Schaff HV
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Jan; 149(1):163-73.e2. PubMed ID: 25439772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Aortic valve replacement in geriatric patients with small aortic roots: are sutureless valves the future?
    Shrestha M; Maeding I; Höffler K; Koigeldiyev N; Marsch G; Siemeni T; Fleissner F; Haverich A
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2013 Nov; 17(5):778-82; discussion 782. PubMed ID: 23851988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Surgical sutureless and transcatheter aortic valves: hemodynamic performance and clinical outcomes in propensity score-matched high-risk populations with severe aortic stenosis.
    Kamperidis V; van Rosendael PJ; de Weger A; Katsanos S; Regeer M; van der Kley F; Mertens B; Sianos G; Ajmone Marsan N; Bax JJ; Delgado V
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Apr; 8(5):670-7. PubMed ID: 25946438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Impact of small prosthesis size on transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement outcomes.
    Salna M; Khalique OK; Chiuzan C; Kurlansky P; Borger MA; Hahn RT; Leon MB; Smith CR; Kodali SK; George I
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Mar; 91(4):765-773. PubMed ID: 28470996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Early and intermediate outcome after aortic valve replacement with a sutureless bioprosthesis: Results of a multicenter study.
    Rubino AS; Santarpino G; De Praetere H; Kasama K; Dalén M; Sartipy U; Lahtinen J; Heikkinen J; Deste W; Pollari F; Svenarud P; Meuris B; Fischlein T; Mignosa C; Biancari F
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Sep; 148(3):865-71; discussion 871. PubMed ID: 24954175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement versus standard bioprosthesis implantation.
    Ferrari E; Roduit C; Salamin P; Caporali E; Demertzis S; Tozzi P; Berdajs D; von Segesser L
    J Card Surg; 2017 Jun; 32(6):322-327. PubMed ID: 28493342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sutureless Versus Rapid Deployment Aortic Valve Replacement: Results From a Multicenter Registry.
    Berretta P; Meuris B; Kappert U; Andreas M; Fiore A; Solinas M; Misfeld M; Carrel TP; Villa E; Savini C; Santarpino G; Teoh K; Albertini A; Fischlein T; Martinelli G; Mignosa C; Glauber M; Shrestha M; Laufer G; Phan K; Yan T; Di Eusanio M
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2022 Sep; 114(3):758-765. PubMed ID: 34563505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Treating the patients in the 'grey-zone' with aortic valve disease: a comparison among conventional surgery, sutureless valves and transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
    Muneretto C; Bisleri G; Moggi A; Di Bacco L; Tespili M; Repossini A; Rambaldini M
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2015 Jan; 20(1):90-5. PubMed ID: 25320140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Immediate outcome after sutureless versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
    Biancari F; Barbanti M; Santarpino G; Deste W; Tamburino C; Gulino S; Immè S; Di Simone E; Todaro D; Pollari F; Fischlein T; Kasama K; Meuris B; Dalén M; Sartipy U; Svenarud P; Lahtinen J; Heikkinen J; Juvonen T; Gatti G; Pappalardo A; Mignosa C; Rubino AS
    Heart Vessels; 2016 Mar; 31(3):427-33. PubMed ID: 25573258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Stentless vs Stented Aortic Valve Bioprostheses in the Small Aortic Root.
    Wollersheim LW; Li WW; Kaya A; Bouma BJ; Driessen AH; van Boven WJ; van der Meulen J; de Mol BA
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Summer; 28(2):390-397. PubMed ID: 28043449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Surgical Enlargement of the Aortic Root Does Not Increase the Operative Risk of Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Rocha RV; Manlhiot C; Feindel CM; Yau TM; Mueller B; David TE; Ouzounian M
    Circulation; 2018 Apr; 137(15):1585-1594. PubMed ID: 29167226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Transcatheter Replacement of Failed Bioprosthetic Valves: Large Multicenter Assessment of the Effect of Implantation Depth on Hemodynamics After Aortic Valve-in-Valve.
    Simonato M; Webb J; Kornowski R; Vahanian A; Frerker C; Nissen H; Bleiziffer S; Duncan A; Rodés-Cabau J; Attizzani GF; Horlick E; Latib A; Bekeredjian R; Barbanti M; Lefevre T; Cerillo A; Hernández JM; Bruschi G; Spargias K; Iadanza A; Brecker S; Palma JH; Finkelstein A; Abdel-Wahab M; Lemos P; Petronio AS; Champagnac D; Sinning JM; Salizzoni S; Napodano M; Fiorina C; Marzocchi A; Leon M; Dvir D
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jun; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 27301396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Aortic valve replacement in elderly with small aortic root and low body surface area; the Perceval S valve and its impact in effective orifice area.
    Dedeilias P; Baikoussis NG; Prappa E; Asvestas D; Argiriou M; Charitos C
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Apr; 11(1):54. PubMed ID: 27066903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.