These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30669765)

  • 1. [Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced sonography and digital subtraction angiography for renal artery stenosis].
    Ren JH; Ma N; Wang SY; Sun YJ; Zhang YW; Ma WH; Guo FJ
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 99(3):209-211. PubMed ID: 30669765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound versus Doppler Ultrasound in Grading Renal Artery Stenosis.
    Cui Y; Zhang Q; Yan J; Wu J
    Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():7145728. PubMed ID: 32964041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for diagnosis and follow-up of renal artery stenosis in patients with chronic kidney disease.
    Li T; Mao Y; Zhao B; Wang H; Ren J; Ma N; Wang S
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2022 May; 47(5):1853-1861. PubMed ID: 35247061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multidetector-row CT angiography of renal artery stenosis in 50 consecutive patients: prospective interobserver comparison with DSA.
    Fraioli F; Catalano C; Bertoletti L; Danti M; Fanelli F; Napoli A; Cavacece M; Passariello R
    Radiol Med; 2006 Apr; 111(3):459-68. PubMed ID: 16683091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Role of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Evaluation of Patients With Suspected Renal Arterial Stenosis.
    Wang Y; Li Y; Wang S; Ma N; Ren J
    Front Cardiovasc Med; 2022; 9():721201. PubMed ID: 35342746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Renal artery stenosis evaluation: diagnostic performance of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR angiography--comparison with DSA.
    Soulez G; Pasowicz M; Benea G; Grazioli L; Niedmann JP; Konopka M; Douek PC; Morana G; Schaefer FK; Vanzulli A; Bluemke DA; Maki JH; Prince MR; Schneider G; Ballarati C; Coulden R; Wasser MN; McCauley TR; Kirchin MA; Pirovano G
    Radiology; 2008 Apr; 247(1):273-85. PubMed ID: 18372471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in renal artery stenosis: comparison with digital subtraction angiography.
    Law YM; Tay KH; Gan YU; Cheah FK; Tan BS
    Hong Kong Med J; 2008 Apr; 14(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 18382021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Renal artery assessment with nonenhanced steady-state free precession versus contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
    Wyttenbach R; Braghetti A; Wyss M; Alerci M; Briner L; Santini P; Cozzi L; Di Valentino M; Katoh M; Marone C; Vock P; Gallino A
    Radiology; 2007 Oct; 245(1):186-95. PubMed ID: 17717326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of digital subtraction angiography with gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis.
    Thornton J; O'Callaghan J; Walshe J; O'Brien E; Varghese JC; Lee MJ
    Eur Radiol; 1999; 9(5):930-4. PubMed ID: 10369993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Renal artery stenosis: comparative evaluation of gadolinium-enhanced MRA and DSA.
    Stacul F; Gava S; Belgrano M; Cernic S; Pagnan L; Pozzi Mucelli F; Cova MA
    Radiol Med; 2008 Jun; 113(4):529-46. PubMed ID: 18480971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Noninvasive investigation for renal artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and color Doppler sonography as compared to digital subtraction angiography.
    Voiculescu A; Hofer M; Hetzel GR; Malms J; Mödder U; Grabensee B; Hollenbeck M
    Clin Exp Hypertens; 2001 Oct; 23(7):521-31. PubMed ID: 11710754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ECG-gated nonenhanced 3D steady-state free precession MR angiography in assessment of transplant renal arteries: comparison with DSA.
    Lanzman RS; Voiculescu A; Walther C; Ringelstein A; Bi X; Schmitt P; Freitag SM; Won S; Scherer A; Blondin D
    Radiology; 2009 Sep; 252(3):914-21. PubMed ID: 19635833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Imaging modalities for renal artery stenosis in suspected renovascular hypertension: prospective intraindividual comparison of color Doppler US, CT angiography, GD-enhanced MR angiography, and digital substraction angiography.
    Rountas C; Vlychou M; Vassiou K; Liakopoulos V; Kapsalaki E; Koukoulis G; Fezoulidis IV; Stefanidis I
    Ren Fail; 2007; 29(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 17497443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 3D FIESTA pulse sequence for assessing renal artery stenosis: is it a reliable application in unenhanced magnetic resonance angiography?
    Gaudiano C; Busato F; Ferramosca E; Cecchelli C; Corcioni B; De Sanctis LB; Santoro A; Golfieri R
    Eur Radiol; 2014 Dec; 24(12):3042-50. PubMed ID: 25059677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Renal artery stenosis and accessory renal arteries: accuracy of detection and visualization with gadolinium-enhanced breath-hold MR angiography.
    Bakker J; Beek FJ; Beutler JJ; Hene RJ; de Kort GA; de Lange EE; Moons KG; Mali WP
    Radiology; 1998 May; 207(2):497-504. PubMed ID: 9577501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for accessory renal artery among patients suspected of renal artery stenosis].
    Ma N; Wang SY; Sun YJ; Ren JH; Guo FJ
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Mar; 99(11):838-840. PubMed ID: 30893727
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) as a new technique for imaging of vascular complications in renal transplants compared to standard imaging modalities.
    Mueller-Peltzer K; Rübenthaler J; Fischereder M; Habicht A; Reiser M; Clevert DA
    Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2017; 67(3-4):407-413. PubMed ID: 28885208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of CT angiography for renal artery stenosis in children.
    Orman G; Masand PM; Kukreja KU; Acosta AA; Guillerman RP; Jadhav SP
    Pediatr Radiol; 2021 Mar; 51(3):419-426. PubMed ID: 33151345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of normal-dose contrast-enhanced MR angiography in assessing renal artery stenosis and accessory renal arteries.
    Korst MB; Joosten FB; Postma CT; Jager GJ; Krabbe JK; Barentsz JO
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Mar; 174(3):629-34. PubMed ID: 10701600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A prospective study of carbon dioxide-digital subtraction vs standard contrast arteriography in the evaluation of the renal arteries.
    Schreier DZ; Weaver FA; Frankhouse J; Papanicolaou G; Shore E; Yellin AE; Harvey F
    Arch Surg; 1996 May; 131(5):503-7; discussion 507-8. PubMed ID: 8624196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.