These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30670066)

  • 21. [Tailored Breast Screening Trial (TBST)].
    Paci E; Mantellini P; Giorgi Rossi P; Falini P; Puliti D;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(4-5):317-27. PubMed ID: 24293498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mammographic density and risk of breast cancer by tumor characteristics: a case-control study.
    Krishnan K; Baglietto L; Stone J; McLean C; Southey MC; English DR; Giles GG; Hopper JL
    BMC Cancer; 2017 Dec; 17(1):859. PubMed ID: 29246131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Sensitivity of screening mammography by density and texture: a cohort study from a population-based screening program in Denmark.
    von Euler-Chelpin M; Lillholm M; Vejborg I; Nielsen M; Lynge E
    Breast Cancer Res; 2019 Oct; 21(1):111. PubMed ID: 31623646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers.
    Mandelson MT; Oestreicher N; Porter PL; White D; Finder CA; Taplin SH; White E
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2000 Jul; 92(13):1081-7. PubMed ID: 10880551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Are breast density and bone mineral density independent risk factors for breast cancer?
    Kerlikowske K; Shepherd J; Creasman J; Tice JA; Ziv E; Cummings SR
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Mar; 97(5):368-74. PubMed ID: 15741573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Validation of a new fully automated software for 2D digital mammographic breast density evaluation in predicting breast cancer risk.
    Giorgi Rossi P; Djuric O; Hélin V; Astley S; Mantellini P; Nitrosi A; Harkness EF; Gauthier E; Puliti D; Balleyguier C; Baron C; Gilbert FJ; Grivegnée A; Pattacini P; Michiels S; Delaloge S
    Sci Rep; 2021 Oct; 11(1):19884. PubMed ID: 34615978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Digital versus screen-film mammography: impact of mammographic density and hormone therapy on breast cancer detection.
    Chiarelli AM; Prummel MV; Muradali D; Shumak RS; Majpruz V; Brown P; Jiang H; Done SJ; Yaffe MJ
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Nov; 154(2):377-87. PubMed ID: 26518019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Effect of California's Breast Density Notification Legislation on Breast Cancer Screening.
    Chau SL; Alabaster A; Luikart K; Brenman LM; Habel LA
    J Prim Care Community Health; 2017 Apr; 8(2):55-62. PubMed ID: 27799412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A comparison of five methods of measuring mammographic density: a case-control study.
    Astley SM; Harkness EF; Sergeant JC; Warwick J; Stavrinos P; Warren R; Wilson M; Beetles U; Gadde S; Lim Y; Jain A; Bundred S; Barr N; Reece V; Brentnall AR; Cuzick J; Howell T; Evans DG
    Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Feb; 20(1):10. PubMed ID: 29402289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Interval Breast Cancer Rates and Histopathologic Tumor Characteristics after False-Positive Findings at Mammography in a Population-based Screening Program.
    Hofvind S; Sagstad S; Sebuødegård S; Chen Y; Roman M; Lee CI
    Radiology; 2018 Apr; 287(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 29239711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Positive predictive values by mammographic density and screening mode in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program.
    Moshina N; Ursin G; Roman M; Sebuødegård S; Hofvind S
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):248-254. PubMed ID: 26724673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A prospective comparative trial of adjunct screening with tomosynthesis or ultrasound in women with mammography-negative dense breasts (ASTOUND-2).
    Tagliafico AS; Mariscotti G; Valdora F; Durando M; Nori J; La Forgia D; Rosenberg I; Caumo F; Gandolfo N; Sormani MP; Signori A; Calabrese M; Houssami N
    Eur J Cancer; 2018 Nov; 104():39-46. PubMed ID: 30316869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Screen-detected versus interval cancers: Effect of imaging modality and breast density in the Flemish Breast Cancer Screening Programme.
    Timmermans L; Bleyen L; Bacher K; Van Herck K; Lemmens K; Van Ongeval C; Van Steen A; Martens P; De Brabander I; Goossens M; Thierens H
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Sep; 27(9):3810-3819. PubMed ID: 28289944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Long-term prognostic implications of risk factors associated with tumor size: a case study of women regularly attending screening.
    Strand F; Humphreys K; Holm J; Eriksson M; Törnberg S; Hall P; Azavedo E; Czene K
    Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Apr; 20(1):31. PubMed ID: 29669579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Association between changes in mammographic density category and the risk of breast cancer: A nationwide cohort study in East-Asian women.
    Kim S; Park B
    Int J Cancer; 2021 Jun; 148(11):2674-2684. PubMed ID: 33368233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of a Deep Learning Risk Score and Standard Mammographic Density Score for Breast Cancer Risk Prediction.
    Dembrower K; Liu Y; Azizpour H; Eklund M; Smith K; Lindholm P; Strand F
    Radiology; 2020 Feb; 294(2):265-272. PubMed ID: 31845842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Mammographic density changes during neoadjuvant breast cancer treatment: NeoDense, a prospective study in Sweden.
    Skarping I; Förnvik D; Heide-Jørgensen U; Sartor H; Hall P; Zackrisson S; Borgquist S
    Breast; 2020 Oct; 53():33-41. PubMed ID: 32563178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Deep Learning Predicts Interval and Screening-detected Cancer from Screening Mammograms: A Case-Case-Control Study in 6369 Women.
    Zhu X; Wolfgruber TK; Leong L; Jensen M; Scott C; Winham S; Sadowski P; Vachon C; Kerlikowske K; Shepherd JA
    Radiology; 2021 Dec; 301(3):550-558. PubMed ID: 34491131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Radiomic Phenotypes of Mammographic Parenchymal Complexity: Toward Augmenting Breast Density in Breast Cancer Risk Assessment.
    Kontos D; Winham SJ; Oustimov A; Pantalone L; Hsieh MK; Gastounioti A; Whaley DH; Hruska CB; Kerlikowske K; Brandt K; Conant EF; Vachon CM
    Radiology; 2019 Jan; 290(1):41-49. PubMed ID: 30375931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The distribution and determinants of mammographic density measures in Western Australian aboriginal women.
    McLean K; Darcey E; Cadby G; Lund H; Pilkington L; Redfern A; Thompson S; Saunders C; Wylie E; Stone J
    Breast Cancer Res; 2019 Feb; 21(1):33. PubMed ID: 30819215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.