These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

434 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30670086)

  • 1. A decision tool to help researchers make decisions about including systematic reviews in overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions.
    Pollock M; Fernandes RM; Newton AS; Scott SD; Hartling L
    Syst Rev; 2019 Jan; 8(1):29. PubMed ID: 30670086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of different inclusion decisions on the comprehensiveness and complexity of overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions.
    Pollock M; Fernandes RM; Newton AS; Scott SD; Hartling L
    Syst Rev; 2019 Jan; 8(1):18. PubMed ID: 30635048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of AMSTAR to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews in overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions.
    Pollock M; Fernandes RM; Hartling L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Mar; 17(1):48. PubMed ID: 28335734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What guidance is available for researchers conducting overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions? A scoping review and qualitative metasummary.
    Pollock M; Fernandes RM; Becker LA; Featherstone R; Hartling L
    Syst Rev; 2016 Nov; 5(1):190. PubMed ID: 27842604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Overview of reviews in child health: evidence synthesis and the knowledge base for a specific population.
    Thomson D; Foisy M; Oleszczuk M; Wingert A; Chisholm A; Hartling L
    Evid Based Child Health; 2013 Jan; 8(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 23878121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Systematic reviews, overviews of reviews and comparative effectiveness reviews: a discussion of approaches to knowledge synthesis.
    Hartling L; Vandermeer B; Fernandes RM
    Evid Based Child Health; 2014 Jun; 9(2):486-94. PubMed ID: 25404611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Only half of the authors of overviews of exercise-related interventions use some strategy to manage overlapping primary studies-a metaresearch study.
    Gutierrez-Arias R; Pieper D; Lunny C; Torres-Castro R; Aguilera-Eguía R; Oliveros MJ; Seron P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2024 Jun; 170():111328. PubMed ID: 38513993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Appraisal methods and outcomes of AMSTAR 2 assessments in overviews of systematic reviews of interventions in the cardiovascular field: A methodological study.
    Karakasis P; Bougioukas KI; Pamporis K; Fragakis N; Haidich AB
    Res Synth Methods; 2024 Mar; 15(2):213-226. PubMed ID: 37956538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A descriptive analysis of overviews of reviews published between 2000 and 2011.
    Hartling L; Chisholm A; Thomson D; Dryden DM
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e49667. PubMed ID: 23166744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The application of AMSTAR2 in 32 overviews of systematic reviews of interventions for mental and behavioural disorders: A cross-sectional study.
    De Santis KK; Lorenz RC; Lakeberg M; Matthias K
    Res Synth Methods; 2022 Jul; 13(4):424-433. PubMed ID: 34664766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical utility of overviews on adverse events of pharmacological interventions.
    Sachse T; Kanji S; Thabet P; Schmiedl S; Thürmann P; Guirguis F; Sajwani S; Gauthier MF; Lunny C; Mathes T; Pieper D
    Syst Rev; 2023 Jul; 12(1):131. PubMed ID: 37525235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Guidance for overviews of reviews continues to accumulate, but important challenges remain: a scoping review.
    Gates M; Gates A; Guitard S; Pollock M; Hartling L
    Syst Rev; 2020 Nov; 9(1):254. PubMed ID: 33148319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Toward a comprehensive evidence map of overview of systematic review methods: paper 2-risk of bias assessment; synthesis, presentation and summary of the findings; and assessment of the certainty of the evidence.
    Lunny C; Brennan SE; McDonald S; McKenzie JE
    Syst Rev; 2018 Oct; 7(1):159. PubMed ID: 30314530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality ratings of reviews in overviews: a comparison of reviews with and without dual (co-)authorship.
    Pieper D; Waltering A; Holstiege J; Büchter RB
    Syst Rev; 2018 Apr; 7(1):63. PubMed ID: 29690911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Exploring decision-makers' challenges and strategies when selecting multiple systematic reviews: insights for AI decision support tools in healthcare.
    Lunny C; Whitelaw S; Reid EK; Chi Y; Ferri N; Zhang JHJ; Pieper D; Kanji S; Veroniki AA; Shea B; Dourka J; Ardern C; Pham B; Bagheri E; Tricco AC
    BMJ Open; 2024 Jul; 14(7):e084124. PubMed ID: 38969371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Guidance on review type selection for health technology assessments: key factors and considerations for deciding when to conduct a de novo systematic review, an update of a systematic review, or an overview of systematic reviews.
    Kim JSM; Pollock M; Kaunelis D; Weeks L
    Syst Rev; 2022 Sep; 11(1):206. PubMed ID: 36167611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Managing overlap of primary study results across systematic reviews: practical considerations for authors of overviews of reviews.
    Lunny C; Pieper D; Thabet P; Kanji S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Jul; 21(1):140. PubMed ID: 34233615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Strategies used to manage overlap of primary study data by exercise-related overviews: protocol for a systematic methodological review.
    Gutierrez-Arias R; Pieper D; Lunny C; Torres-Castro R; Aguilera-Eguía R; Seron P
    BMJ Open; 2023 Apr; 13(4):e069906. PubMed ID: 37080626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Overviews of reviews incompletely report methods for handling overlapping, discordant, and problematic data.
    Lunny C; Brennan SE; Reid J; McDonald S; McKenzie JE
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Feb; 118():69-85. PubMed ID: 31606430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Data extraction methods: an analysis of internal reporting discrepancies in single manuscripts and practical advice.
    Puljak L; Riva N; Parmelli E; González-Lorenzo M; Moja L; Pieper D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Jan; 117():158-164. PubMed ID: 31541692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.