These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3067067)

  • 1. The expanding scope of PRO review. Explaining Medicare's new review requirements in Missouri.
    Jaco D
    Mo Med; 1988 Oct; 85(10):653-7. PubMed ID: 3067067
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality assessment mechanism in Medicare contract with the PRO of New Jersey, Inc.
    Kingsley DI
    N J Med; 1989 Feb; 86(2):105-7. PubMed ID: 2651999
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The changing face of Medicare peer review: collaborative project success stories.
    Sotham J
    Mo Med; 1996 Mar; 93(3):112-4. PubMed ID: 8867269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Denial of payment for poor quality care. Missouri's PRO explains Medicare's latest requirement.
    Akhter MN; Jaco D
    Mo Med; 1987 Mar; 84(3):137-40. PubMed ID: 3334407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Medicare program; Peer Review Organizations: revised scopes of work for the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, and all states except Delaware, Florida, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Washington, and Wyoming--HCFA. Final notice.
    Fed Regist; 1992 Jun; 57(116):26871-5. PubMed ID: 10119326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Medicare program; utilization and quality control peer review program; third Scope of Work for peer review organizations--HCFA. Notice.
    Fed Regist; 1988 Sep; 53(176):35234-7. PubMed ID: 10302729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Medicare's new malpractice rule: a review.
    Hyatt TK
    Health Law Vigil; 1986 May; 9(10):3-7. PubMed ID: 10300783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Medicare program; Peer Review Organizations: new PRO contracts for all states and territories and the District of Columbia--HCFA. Notice.
    Fed Regist; 1993 Mar; 58(39):12042-7. PubMed ID: 10124395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Medicare's peer review organizations. Renewed emphasis on quality of patient care.
    Sheehy TJ
    Resid Staff Physician; 1988 Apr; 34(4):63-5, 68-9. PubMed ID: 10302358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. New PRO scope of work signals emphasis on quality.
    Akhter MN; Jaco D
    Mo Med; 1986 Jul; 83(7):377-9. PubMed ID: 3334073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Medicare program; peer review organizations; revised scopes of work for Maryland; New Jersey; the Virgin Islands; and Guam, American Samoa, the Northern Mariana Islands, and the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands--HCFA.
    Fed Regist; 1989 Mar; 54(39):8599-603. PubMed ID: 10318635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Medicare program; utilization and quality control peer review program; solicitation of comments on proposed PRO program scope of work--HCFA. Notice.
    Fed Regist; 1985 Nov; 50(218):46702. PubMed ID: 10300403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Peer review: still tilting at windmills.
    Schorr B
    Physicians Manage; 1987 Oct; 27(10):124-6, 128, 133. PubMed ID: 10302231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Medicare's national coverage decisions, 1999-2003: quality of evidence and review times.
    Neumann PJ; Divi N; Beinfeld MT; Levine BS; Keenan PS; Halpern EF; Gazelle GS
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2005; 24(1):243-54. PubMed ID: 15647237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Peer review in a competitive market.
    Miller JW
    Ala J Med Sci; 1986 Jan; 23(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 3513656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. One peer review organization's experience in developing hospital peer groups.
    Sumner BM; Thompson MS; Suarez WG; Davis M; Bell JA; Shanedling SB
    Clin Perform Qual Health Care; 1993; 1(4):239-42. PubMed ID: 10135642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Medicare program; Peer Review Organizations: revised scopes of work for Delaware, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Jersey, Nevada, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Washington, and Wyoming--HCFA. Final notice.
    Fed Regist; 1991 Sep; 56(171):43790-3. PubMed ID: 10113846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Medicare and Medicaid programs; utilization and quality control peer review organization (PRO); assumption of responsibilities and Medicare review functions and coordination of Medicaid with peer review organization--HCFA. Proposed rule.
    Fed Regist; 1984 Jul; 49(138):29026-41. PubMed ID: 10299606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Whither the PRO? Analysis of the effectiveness of three Medicare peer review organizations in a Florida hospital.
    Fleegler BM; Wolk M; McCarville J
    J Fla Med Assoc; 1995 Mar; 82(3):203-5. PubMed ID: 7738525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A New World order: is big brother watching your medical practice?
    Musgrave TL; Greene T; Stephens JB; Sensabaugh J; Johnson K; Fitts J
    J Tenn Med Assoc; 1993 Dec; 86(12):529-31. PubMed ID: 8295424
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.