894 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30671962)
1. Methodological quality and risk-of-bias assessments in systematic reviews of treatments for peri-implantitis.
Hasuike A; Ueno D; Nagashima H; Kubota T; Tsukune N; Watanabe N; Sato S
J Periodontal Res; 2019 Aug; 54(4):374-387. PubMed ID: 30671962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Appraisal of systematic reviews on the management of peri-implant diseases with two methodological tools.
Faggion CM; Monje A; Wasiak J
J Clin Periodontol; 2018 Jun; 45(6):754-766. PubMed ID: 29575189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk of bias assessments and reporting quality of systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials examining acupuncture for depression: An overview and meta-epidemiology study.
Luo S; Long Y; Xiao W; Wang X; Chen R; Guo Q; Liu J; Shao R; Du L; Chen M
J Evid Based Med; 2020 Feb; 13(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 32112515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Network meta-analysis for evaluating interventions in implant dentistry: the case of peri-implantitis treatment.
Faggion CM; Chambrone L; Listl S; Tu YK
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Aug; 15(4):576-88. PubMed ID: 21834862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intra-articular hyaluronic acid injection in treating knee osteoarthritis: assessing risk of bias in systematic reviews with ROBIS tool.
Xing D; Wang B; Zhang W; Yang Z; Hou Y; Chen Y; Lin J
Int J Rheum Dis; 2017 Nov; 20(11):1658-1673. PubMed ID: 29044993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Critical Overview of Systematic Reviews of Chemotherapy for Advanced and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer using both AMSTAR2 and ROBIS as Quality Assessment Tools.
Dang A; Chidirala S; Veeranki P; Vallish BN
Rev Recent Clin Trials; 2021; 16(2):180-192. PubMed ID: 32875987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Methodological quality of systematic reviews on treatments for depression: a cross-sectional study.
Chung VCH; Wu XY; Feng Y; Ho RST; Wong SYS; Threapleton D
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci; 2018 Dec; 27(6):619-627. PubMed ID: 28462754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.
Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The methodological quality assessment of systematic reviews/meta-analyses of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome using AMSTAR2.
Guan X; Lao Y; Wang J; Wang Y; Bai Y; Li X; Liu S; Li Z; Li F; Dong Z
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Nov; 23(1):281. PubMed ID: 38012566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of methodological tools for assessing the quality of studies in periodontology and implant dentistry: a systematic review.
Faggion CM; Huda F; Wasiak J
J Clin Periodontol; 2014 Jun; 41(6):625-31. PubMed ID: 24666018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Methodological quality evaluation of systematic reviews or meta-analysis of trastuzumab-based therapy for breast cancer: A systematic review.
Wei H; Zhang YJ; Yu T; Yan XY; Jiang Q
Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Jan; 100(4):e24389. PubMed ID: 33530234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Methodological quality and risk of bias in orthodontic systematic reviews using AMSTAR and ROBIS.
Hooper EJ; Pandis N; Cobourne MT; Seehra J
Eur J Orthod; 2021 Oct; 43(5):544-550. PubMed ID: 33723612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is the evaluation of risk of bias in periodontology and implant dentistry comprehensive? A systematic review.
Faggion CM; Listl S; Alarcón MA
J Clin Periodontol; 2015 May; 42(5):488-94. PubMed ID: 25809114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effectiveness and safety of manual therapy for knee osteoarthritis: An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Feng T; Wang X; Jin Z; Qin X; Sun C; Qi B; Zhang Y; Zhu L; Wei X
Front Public Health; 2023; 11():1081238. PubMed ID: 36908468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine adjuvant therapy for severe pneumonia: evidence mapping of the randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses.
Xie K; Guan S; Jing H; Ji W; Kong X; Du S; Jia M; Wang H
Front Pharmacol; 2023; 14():1227436. PubMed ID: 37841930
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR.
Dosenovic S; Jelicic Kadic A; Vucic K; Markovina N; Pieper D; Puljak L
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 May; 18(1):37. PubMed ID: 29739339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Methodological Quality and Risk of Bias of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses on Stem Cells for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Cross-Sectional Survey.
Liu A; Yu W; Chen J; Guo T; Niu P; Feng H; Jia Y
Stem Cells Dev; 2022 Aug; 31(15-16):431-444. PubMed ID: 35316077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Tai Chi for improving balance and reducing falls: An overview of 14 systematic reviews.
Zhong D; Xiao Q; Xiao X; Li Y; Ye J; Xia L; Zhang C; Li J; Zheng H; Jin R
Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2020 Nov; 63(6):505-517. PubMed ID: 31981834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews of interventions aimed at improving vaccination coverage using AMSTAR and ROBIS checklists.
Jaca A; Ndze VN; Wiysonge CS
Hum Vaccin Immunother; 2019; 15(12):2824-2835. PubMed ID: 31348722
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis on Asthma Treatments. A Cross-Sectional Study.
Wu IXY; Deng Y; Wang H; Chen Y; Wong CHL; Chung VCH
Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2020 Aug; 17(8):949-957. PubMed ID: 32383967
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
