173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30672164)
1. Structured Reporting versus Free-Text Reporting for Appendiceal Computed Tomography in Adolescents and Young Adults: Preference Survey of 594 Referring Physicians, Surgeons, and Radiologists from 20 Hospitals.
Park SB; Kim MJ; Ko Y; Sim JY; Kim HJ; Lee KH;
Korean J Radiol; 2019 Feb; 20(2):246-255. PubMed ID: 30672164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using 2-mSv Appendiceal CT in Usual Practice for Adolescents and Young Adults: Willingness Survey of 579 Radiologists, Emergency Physicians, and Surgeons from 20 Hospitals.
Kim HJ; Lee KH; Kim MJ; Park SB; Ko Y;
Korean J Radiol; 2020 Jan; 21(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 31920030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Appendiceal Visualization on 2-mSv CT vs. Conventional-Dose CT in Adolescents and Young Adults with Suspected Appendicitis: An Analysis of Large Pragmatic Randomized Trial Data.
Cho J; Kim Y; Lee S; Min HD; Ko Y; Chee CG; Kim HY; Park JH; Lee KH;
Korean J Radiol; 2022 Apr; 23(4):413-425. PubMed ID: 35289144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of 2-mSv CT vs. conventional-dose CT in adolescents and young adults with suspected appendicitis: post hoc subgroup analysis of the LOCAT data.
Ko Y; Lee WJ; Park JH; Kim HY; Sim JY; Tannaphai P; Lee KH;
Eur Radiol; 2020 Aug; 30(8):4573-4585. PubMed ID: 32240354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of computed tomography of the appendix on treatment of patients and use of hospital resources.
Rao PM; Rhea JT; Novelline RA; Mostafavi AA; McCabe CJ
N Engl J Med; 1998 Jan; 338(3):141-6. PubMed ID: 9428814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effective use of CT by surgeons in acute appendicitis diagnosis.
Fersahoğlu MM; Çiyiltepe H; Ergin A; Fersahoğlu AT; Esen Bulut N; Başak A; Karip B; Ağca B
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg; 2021 Jan; 27(1):43-49. PubMed ID: 33394463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Size matters: Computed tomographic measurements of the appendix in emergency department scans.
Moskowitz E; Khan AD; Cribari C; Schroeppel TJ
Am J Surg; 2019 Aug; 218(2):271-274. PubMed ID: 30558802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The status of appendiceal CT in an urban medical center 5 years after its introduction: experience with 753 patients.
Rhea JT; Halpern EF; Ptak T; Lawrason JN; Sacknoff R; Novelline RA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jun; 184(6):1802-8. PubMed ID: 15908534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of computed tomography in predicting appendiceal perforation.
Fraser JD; Aguayo P; Sharp SW; Snyder CL; Rivard DC; Cully BE; Sharp RJ; Ostlie DJ; St Peter SD
J Pediatr Surg; 2010 Jan; 45(1):231-4; discussion 234-4. PubMed ID: 20105609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comprehensive review of typical and atypical pathology of the appendix on CT: cases with clinical implications.
Quadri R; Vasan V; Hester C; Porembka M; Fielding J
Clin Imaging; 2019; 53():65-77. PubMed ID: 30316106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Differentiation of early perforated from nonperforated appendicitis: MDCT findings, MDCT diagnostic performance, and clinical outcome.
Kim MS; Park HW; Park JY; Park HJ; Lee SY; Hong HP; Kwag HJ; Kwon HJ
Abdom Imaging; 2014 Jun; 39(3):459-66. PubMed ID: 24633221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Final diagnosis and patient disposition following equivocal results on 2-mSv CT vs. conventional-dose CT in adolescents and young adults with suspected appendicitis: a post hoc analysis of large pragmatic randomized trial data.
Cho J; Lee S; Min HD; Kim HY; Ko Y; Park JH; Park SB; Lee KH;
Eur Radiol; 2021 Dec; 31(12):9176-9187. PubMed ID: 33993331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preoperative computed tomography is poor in detecting tumors of the appendix among patients with acute appendicitis: A cohort study of 5,224 appendectomies.
Kangaspunta H; Tahkola K; Wirta EV; Kotaluoto S; Laukkarinen J; Ukkonen M
J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2020 Mar; 88(3):396-401. PubMed ID: 32107355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Low-dose (2-mSv) computed tomography for suspected appendicitis: Applicability in an emergency department.
Woo JH; Jeon JJ; Choi SJ; Choi JY; Jang YS; Lim YS; Shim YS; Ahn SJ; Park JH; Lee SS
Am J Emerg Med; 2018 Dec; 36(12):2139-2143. PubMed ID: 29571828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sensitivity and specificity of the individual CT signs of appendicitis: experience with 200 helical appendiceal CT examinations.
Rao PM; Rhea JT; Novelline RA
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1997; 21(5):686-92. PubMed ID: 9294553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of Computed Tomography to Determine Perforation in Patients With Acute Appendicitis.
Gaskill CE; Simianu VV; Carnell J; Hippe DS; Bhargava P; Flum DR; Davidson GH
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2018; 47(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 28162864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A novel reporting system to improve accuracy in appendicitis imaging.
Godwin BD; Drake FT; Simianu VV; Shriki JE; Hippe DS; Dighe M; Bastawrous S; Cuevas C; Flum D; Bhargava P
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jun; 204(6):1212-9. PubMed ID: 26001230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Appendiceal length as an independent risk factor for acute appendicitis.
Pickhardt PJ; Suhonen J; Lawrence EM; Muñoz del Rio A; Pooler BD
Eur Radiol; 2013 Dec; 23(12):3311-7. PubMed ID: 23821021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Added value of coronal reformations for duty radiologists and for referring physicians or surgeons in the CT diagnosis of acute appendicitis.
Lee KH; Kim YH; Hahn S; Lee KW; Lee HJ; Kim TJ; Kang SB; Shin JH; Park BJ
Korean J Radiol; 2006; 7(2):87-96. PubMed ID: 16799269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical and computed tomography findings of appendiceal diverticulitis vs acute appendicitis.
Ito D; Miki K; Seiichiro S; Hata S; Kobayashi K; Teruya M; Kaminishi M
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Apr; 21(13):3921-7. PubMed ID: 25852277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
