144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30672350)
1. An 18-year comparison of hybrid total hip replacement and Birmingham hip resurfacing in active young patients.
Jonas SC; Whitehouse MR; Bick S; Bannister GC; Baker RP
Hip Int; 2019 Nov; 29(6):630-637. PubMed ID: 30672350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A medium-term comparison of hybrid hip replacement and Birmingham hip resurfacing in active young patients.
Baker RP; Pollard TC; Eastaugh-Waring SJ; Bannister GC
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Feb; 93(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 21282752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Five to Ten-Year Results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Implant in the U.S.: A Single Institution's Experience.
Ford MC; Hellman MD; Kazarian GS; Clohisy JC; Nunley RM; Barrack RL
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2018 Nov; 100(21):1879-1887. PubMed ID: 30399083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip. A five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing.
Pollard TC; Baker RP; Eastaugh-Waring SJ; Bannister GC
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 May; 88(5):592-600. PubMed ID: 16645103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Results of the First U.S. FDA-Approved Hip Resurfacing Device at 10-Year Follow-up.
Su EP; Ho H; Bhal V; Housman LR; Masonis JL; Noble JW; Hopper RH; Engh CA
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2021 Jul; 103(14):1303-1311. PubMed ID: 33999875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compared with 28-mm diameter metal-on-metal total hip replacement: a randomised study with six to nine years' follow-up.
Vendittoli PA; Rivière C; Roy AG; Barry J; Lusignan D; Lavigne M
Bone Joint J; 2013 Nov; 95-B(11):1464-73. PubMed ID: 24151264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mid-Term Results and Predictors of Patient-Reported Outcomes of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing.
Oak SR; Strnad GJ; O'Rourke C; Higuera CA; Spindler KP; Brooks PJ
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jan; 32(1):110-118. PubMed ID: 27480827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The outcome and survival of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in patients aged less than 50 years: a prospective observational cohort study with minimum ten-year follow-up.
Scholes CJ; Ebrahimi M; Farah SB; Field C; Cordingley R; Kerr D; Kohan L
Bone Joint J; 2019 Jan; 101-B(1):113-120. PubMed ID: 30601056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The outcome of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing in patients aged < 50 years up to 14 years post-operatively.
Matharu GS; McBryde CW; Pynsent WB; Pynsent PB; Treacy RB
Bone Joint J; 2013 Sep; 95-B(9):1172-7. PubMed ID: 23997127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Results of Birmingham hip resurfacing at 12 to 15 years: a single-surgeon series.
Daniel J; Pradhan C; Ziaee H; Pynsent PB; McMinn DJ
Bone Joint J; 2014 Oct; 96-B(10):1298-306. PubMed ID: 25274912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Birmingham Hip Resurfacing at 25 years.
Nandra RS; Elnahal WA; Mayne A; Brash L; McBryde CW; Treacy RBC
Bone Joint J; 2024 Jun; 106-B(6):540-547. PubMed ID: 38821495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Birmingham hip resurfacing in patients who are seventy years of age or older.
Carrothers AD; Gilbert RE; Richardson JB
Hip Int; 2011; 21(2):217-24. PubMed ID: 21462151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Birmingham hip resurfacing at a mean of ten years: results from an independent centre.
Coulter G; Young DA; Dalziel RE; Shimmin AJ
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Mar; 94(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 22371536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Survivorship and clinical outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing: a minimum ten years' follow-up.
Azam MQ; McMahon S; Hawdon G; Sankineani SR
Int Orthop; 2016 Jan; 40(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 25820838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Poor 10-year survivorship of hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
Seppänen M; Karvonen M; Virolainen P; Remes V; Pulkkinen P; Eskelinen A; Liukas A; Mäkelä KT
Acta Orthop; 2016 Dec; 87(6):554-559. PubMed ID: 27759474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cementless total hip arthroplasty in young patients under the age of 30: a minimum 10-year follow-up.
Shin EH; Moon KH
Hip Int; 2018 Sep; 28(5):507-513. PubMed ID: 29756492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Birmingham Hip Resurfacing for osteoarthritis - a Canadian retrospective cohort study with a minimum 10-year follow-up.
Bourget-Murray J; Watt Kearns SJ; Piroozfar S; Lukenchuk J; Johnston K; Werle J
Can J Surg; 2022; 65(3):E296-E302. PubMed ID: 35504661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The ten-year survival of the Birmingham hip resurfacing: an independent series.
Murray DW; Grammatopoulos G; Pandit H; Gundle R; Gill HS; McLardy-Smith P
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Sep; 94(9):1180-6. PubMed ID: 22933488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Short and mid-term outcomes and functional results in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty at 5 years follow-up: the Spanish experience.
Pérez-Moro OS; Fernández-Cuadros ME; Neira-Borrajo I; Aranda-Izquierdo E; Albaladejo-Florin MJ; Llopis-Miró R
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Apr; 20(1):172. PubMed ID: 30992064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of cementless total hip arthroplasty survivorship between metal-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene and ceramic on ceramic bearings: A case control study with a 5-9-year follow-up.
Higuchi Y; Seki T; Hasegawa Y; Morita D; Komatsu D; Takegami Y; Ishiguro N
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2018 Sep; 104(5):663-669. PubMed ID: 29902637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
