111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30672362)
1. The Effect of Gender on Visual Field Sensitivity: The Singapore Chinese Eye Study.
Tan NYQ; Tham YC; Koh V; Cheung CY; Aung T; Wong TY; Cheng CY
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2019 Jun; 26(3):183-188. PubMed ID: 30672362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Effect of Testing Reliability on Visual Field Sensitivity in Normal Eyes: The Singapore Chinese Eye Study.
Tan NYQ; Tham YC; Koh V; Nguyen DQ; Cheung CY; Aung T; Wong TY; Cheng CY
Ophthalmology; 2018 Jan; 125(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 28863943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pattern of Visual Field Loss in Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma Across Different Severity Levels.
Atalay E; Nongpiur ME; Yap SC; Wong TT; Goh D; Husain R; Perera SA; Aung T
Ophthalmology; 2016 Sep; 123(9):1957-64. PubMed ID: 27423311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of focal lamina cribrosa defect on glaucomatous visual field progression.
Faridi OS; Park SC; Kabadi R; Su D; De Moraes CG; Liebmann JM; Ritch R
Ophthalmology; 2014 Aug; 121(8):1524-30. PubMed ID: 24697910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multicenter Comparison of the Toronto Portable Perimeter with the Humphrey Field Analyzer: A Pilot Study.
Ahmed Y; Pereira A; Bowden S; Shi RB; Li Y; Ahmed IIK; Arshinoff SA
Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2022; 5(2):146-159. PubMed ID: 34358734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of pseudophakia on standard perimetry parameters.
Mutlu FM; Akay F; Bayer A
Curr Eye Res; 2009 Sep; 34(9):711-6. PubMed ID: 19839864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reversal of Glaucoma Hemifield Test Results and Visual Field Features in Glaucoma.
Wang M; Pasquale LR; Shen LQ; Boland MV; Wellik SR; De Moraes CG; Myers JS; Wang H; Baniasadi N; Li D; Silva RNE; Bex PJ; Elze T
Ophthalmology; 2018 Mar; 125(3):352-360. PubMed ID: 29103791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative study of retinal nerve fiber layer measurement by StratusOCT and GDx VCC, II: structure/function regression analysis in glaucoma.
Leung CK; Chong KK; Chan WM; Yiu CK; Tso MY; Woo J; Tsang MK; Tse KK; Yung WH
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Oct; 46(10):3702-11. PubMed ID: 16186352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An objective evaluation of gaze tracking in Humphrey perimetry and the relation with the reproducibility of visual fields: a pilot study in glaucoma.
Ishiyama Y; Murata H; Mayama C; Asaoka R
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Nov; 55(12):8149-52. PubMed ID: 25389198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of Cataract Opacity Type and Glaucoma Severity on Visual Field Index.
Chung HJ; Choi JH; Lee YC; Kim SY
Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Jun; 93(6):575-8. PubMed ID: 27214250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does eye examination order for standard automated perimetry matter?
Kelly SR; Bryan SR; Crabb DP
Acta Ophthalmol; 2019 Sep; 97(6):e833-e838. PubMed ID: 30801992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patients have two eyes!: binocular versus better eye visual field indices.
Asaoka R; Crabb DP; Yamashita T; Russell RA; Wang YX; Garway-Heath DF
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Sep; 52(9):7007-11. PubMed ID: 21810985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relationship between visual field sensitivity and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness as measured by optical coherence tomography.
Ajtony C; Balla Z; Somoskeoy S; Kovacs B
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Jan; 48(1):258-63. PubMed ID: 17197541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How does glaucoma look?: patient perception of visual field loss.
Crabb DP; Smith ND; Glen FC; Burton R; Garway-Heath DF
Ophthalmology; 2013 Jun; 120(6):1120-6. PubMed ID: 23415421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.
Fortune B; Demirel S; Zhang X; Hood DC; Patterson E; Jamil A; Mansberger SL; Cioffi GA; Johnson CA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors affecting rates of visual field progression in glaucoma patients with optic disc hemorrhage.
Prata TS; De Moraes CG; Teng CC; Tello C; Ritch R; Liebmann JM
Ophthalmology; 2010 Jan; 117(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 19896197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy of the Amsler Grid Test in Evaluating Glaucomatous Central Visual Field Defects.
Su D; Greenberg A; Simonson JL; Teng CC; Liebmann JM; Ritch R; Park SC
Ophthalmology; 2016 Apr; 123(4):737-43. PubMed ID: 26783097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The region of largest β-zone parapapillary atrophy area predicts the location of most rapid visual field progression.
Teng CC; De Moraes CG; Prata TS; Liebmann CA; Tello C; Ritch R; Liebmann JM
Ophthalmology; 2011 Dec; 118(12):2409-13. PubMed ID: 21885127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detecting Preperimetric Glaucoma with Standard Automated Perimetry Using a Deep Learning Classifier.
Asaoka R; Murata H; Iwase A; Araie M
Ophthalmology; 2016 Sep; 123(9):1974-80. PubMed ID: 27395766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
