These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30672384)

  • 21. I can't keep your face and voice out of my head: neural correlates of an attentional bias toward nonverbal emotional cues.
    Jacob H; Brück C; Domin M; Lotze M; Wildgruber D
    Cereb Cortex; 2014 Jun; 24(6):1460-73. PubMed ID: 23382516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. How automatic are audiovisual links in exogenous spatial attention?
    Mazza V; Turatto M; Rossi M; Umiltà C
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Feb; 45(3):514-22. PubMed ID: 16581094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Oscillatory alpha modulations in right auditory regions reflect the validity of acoustic cues in an auditory spatial attention task.
    Weisz N; Müller N; Jatzev S; Bertrand O
    Cereb Cortex; 2014 Oct; 24(10):2579-90. PubMed ID: 23645711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Intentional switching in auditory selective attention: Exploring age-related effects in a spatial setup requiring speech perception.
    Oberem J; Koch I; Fels J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Jun; 177():36-43. PubMed ID: 28456098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Spatial deployment of attention within and across hemifields in an auditory task.
    Rorden C; Driver J
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Apr; 137(3-4):487-96. PubMed ID: 11355393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Control mechanisms mediating shifts of attention in auditory and visual space: a spatio-temporal ERP analysis.
    Green JJ; Teder-Sälejärvi WA; McDonald JJ
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Oct; 166(3-4):358-69. PubMed ID: 16075294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Explaining response-repetition effects in task switching: evidence from switching cue modality suggests episodic binding and response inhibition.
    Koch I; Frings C; Schuch S
    Psychol Res; 2018 May; 82(3):570-579. PubMed ID: 28286905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Attentional flexibility is imbalanced: Asymmetric cost for switches between external and internal attention.
    Verschooren S; Liefooghe B; Brass M; Pourtois G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1399-1414. PubMed ID: 31343243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Updating sensory versus task representations during task-switching: insights from cognitive brain potentials in humans.
    Periáñez JA; Barceló F
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Mar; 47(4):1160-72. PubMed ID: 19350711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Modality and task switching interactions using bi-modal and bivalent stimuli.
    Sandhu R; Dyson BJ
    Brain Cogn; 2013 Jun; 82(1):90-9. PubMed ID: 23524240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Increasing the difficulty of response selection does not increase the switch cost.
    Liefooghe B; Verbruggen F
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Dec; 63(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 20025391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Semantic associations between arithmetic and space: Evidence from temporal order judgements.
    Andres M; Salvaggio S; Lefèvre N; Pesenti M; Masson N
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Apr; 48(3):361-369. PubMed ID: 31529261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Bimodal-divided attention attenuates visually induced inhibition of return with audiovisual targets.
    Tang X; Gao Y; Yang W; Ren Y; Wu J; Zhang M; Wu Q
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Apr; 237(4):1093-1107. PubMed ID: 30770958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cueing effects of target location probability and repetition.
    Kabata T; Matsumoto E
    Vision Res; 2012 Nov; 73():23-9. PubMed ID: 23022549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. On the relative contributions of multisensory integration and crossmodal exogenous spatial attention to multisensory response enhancement.
    Van der Stoep N; Spence C; Nijboer TC; Van der Stigchel S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Nov; 162():20-8. PubMed ID: 26436587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Interactions between voluntary and stimulus-driven spatial attention mechanisms across sensory modalities.
    Santangelo V; Olivetti Belardinelli M; Spence C; Macaluso E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 21(12):2384-97. PubMed ID: 19199406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The flip side of the auditory spatial selection benefit: larger attentional mixing costs for target selection by ear than by gender in auditory task switching.
    Koch I; Lawo V
    Exp Psychol; 2015; 62(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 25384645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cognitive control in the cocktail party: Preparing selective attention to dichotically presented voices supports distractor suppression.
    Nolden S; Ibrahim CN; Koch I
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Apr; 81(3):727-737. PubMed ID: 30569433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Auditory Multi-Stability: Idiosyncratic Perceptual Switching Patterns, Executive Functions and Personality Traits.
    Farkas D; Denham SL; Bendixen A; Tóth D; Kondo HM; Winkler I
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0154810. PubMed ID: 27135945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Crossmodal attention switching: auditory dominance in temporal discrimination tasks.
    Lukas S; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Nov; 153():139-46. PubMed ID: 25463554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.