BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30673145)

  • 1. Dosimetric verification of IMPT using a commercial heterogeneous phantom.
    Yasui K; Toshito T; Omachi C; Hayashi K; Kinou H; Katsurada M; Hayashi N; Ogino H
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 20(2):114-120. PubMed ID: 30673145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of grid size on uniform scanning and IMPT plans in XiO treatment planning system for brain cancer.
    Rana S; Zheng Y
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):447–456. PubMed ID: 26699310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical experience with EPID dosimetry for prostate IMRT pre-treatment dose verification.
    McDermott LN; Wendling M; van Asselen B; Stroom J; Sonke JJ; van Herk M; Mijnheer BJ
    Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3921-30. PubMed ID: 17089854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implication of spot position error on plan quality and patient safety in pencil-beam-scanning proton therapy.
    Yu J; Beltran CJ; Herman MG
    Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081706. PubMed ID: 25086516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dosimetric comparison of stopping power calibration with dual-energy CT and single-energy CT in proton therapy treatment planning.
    Zhu J; Penfold SN
    Med Phys; 2016 Jun; 43(6):2845-2854. PubMed ID: 27277033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ion chamber and film-based quality assurance of mixed electron-photon radiation therapy.
    Heng VJ; Serban M; Seuntjens J; Renaud MA
    Med Phys; 2021 Sep; 48(9):5382-5395. PubMed ID: 34224144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Treatment planning comparison of IMPT, VMAT and 4π radiotherapy for prostate cases.
    Tran A; Zhang J; Woods K; Yu V; Nguyen D; Gustafson G; Rosen L; Sheng K
    Radiat Oncol; 2017 Jan; 12(1):10. PubMed ID: 28077128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. VMAT and IMRT plan-specific correction factors for linac-based ionization chamber dosimetry.
    Desai VK; Labby ZE; Hyun MA; DeWerd LA; Culberson WS
    Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):913-924. PubMed ID: 30449040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measurement validation of treatment planning for a MR-Linac.
    Chen X; Paulson ES; Ahunbay E; Sanli A; Klawikowski S; Li XA
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jul; 20(7):28-38. PubMed ID: 31254376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dosimetric verification of surface and superficial doses for head and neck IMRT with different PTV shrinkage margins.
    Shiau AC; Lai PL; Liang JA; Shueng PW; Chen WL; Kuan WP
    Med Phys; 2011 Mar; 38(3):1435-43. PubMed ID: 21520855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantitative evaluation of 3D dosimetry for stereotactic volumetric-modulated arc delivery using COMPASS.
    Vikraman S; Manigandan D; Karrthick KP; Sambasivaselli R; Senniandavar V; Ramu M; Rajesh T; Lutz M; Muthukumaran M; Karthikeyan N; Tejinder K
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 16(1):5128. PubMed ID: 25679152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical implementation of Dosimetry Check™ for TomoTherapy
    Chung E; Kwon D; Park T; Kang H; Chung Y
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 19(6):193-199. PubMed ID: 30354001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Feasibility of MRI-only treatment planning for proton therapy in brain and prostate cancers: Dose calculation accuracy in substitute CT images.
    Koivula L; Wee L; Korhonen J
    Med Phys; 2016 Aug; 43(8):4634. PubMed ID: 27487880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Experimental verification of IMPT treatment plans in an anthropomorphic phantom in the presence of delivery uncertainties.
    Albertini F; Casiraghi M; Lorentini S; Rombi B; Lomax AJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jul; 56(14):4415-31. PubMed ID: 21709345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measurement-based Monte Carlo dose calculation system for IMRT pretreatment and on-line transit dose verifications.
    Lin MH; Chao TC; Lee CC; Tung CJ; Yeh CY; Hong JH
    Med Phys; 2009 Apr; 36(4):1167-75. PubMed ID: 19472622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 3D dose verification using tomotherapy CT detector array.
    Sheng K; Jones R; Yang W; Saraiya S; Schneider B; Chen Q; Sobering G; Olivera G; Read P
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Feb; 82(2):1013-20. PubMed ID: 21362580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation and uncertainty analysis of a pre-treatment 2D dose prediction model.
    Baeza JA; Wolfs CJA; Nijsten SMJJG; Verhaegen F
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Feb; 63(3):035033. PubMed ID: 29176074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy dose verification using fluence and portal imaging device.
    Sumida I; Yamaguchi H; Das IJ; Kizaki H; Aboshi K; Tsujii M; Yamada Y; Suzuki O; Seo Y; Isohashi F; Ogawa K
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 17(1):259-271. PubMed ID: 26894363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Commissioning an in-room mobile CT for adaptive proton therapy with a compact proton system.
    Oliver JA; Zeidan O; Meeks SL; Shah AP; Pukala J; Kelly P; Ramakrishna NR; Willoughby TR
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 May; 19(3):149-158. PubMed ID: 29682879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A 3D correction method for predicting the readings of a PinPoint chamber on the CyberKnife
    Zhang Y; Brandner E; Ozhasoglu C; Lalonde R; Heron DE; Huq MS
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Feb; 63(4):045010. PubMed ID: 29350197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.