These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
348 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30675336)
1. Measuring biopsychosocial risk for back pain disability in chiropractic patients using the STarT back screening tool: a cross-sectional survey. Khan Y; Lawrence D; Vining R; Derby D Chiropr Man Therap; 2019; 27():2. PubMed ID: 30675336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Subgrouping for patients with low back pain: a multidimensional approach incorporating cluster analysis and the STarT Back Screening Tool. Beneciuk JM; Robinson ME; George SZ J Pain; 2015 Jan; 16(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 25451622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clustering of patients with chronic low back pain in terms of physical and psychological factors: A cross-sectional study based on the STarT Back Screening Tool. Yadollahpour N; Zahednejad S; Yazdi MJS; Esfandiarpour F J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2020; 33(4):581-587. PubMed ID: 31658040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Indigestion and heartburn: a descriptive study of prevalence in persons seeking care from chiropractors. Bryner P; Staerker PG J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1996 Jun; 19(5):317-23. PubMed ID: 8792321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The STarT back screening tool and individual psychological measures: evaluation of prognostic capabilities for low back pain clinical outcomes in outpatient physical therapy settings. Beneciuk JM; Bishop MD; Fritz JM; Robinson ME; Asal NR; Nisenzon AN; George SZ Phys Ther; 2013 Mar; 93(3):321-33. PubMed ID: 23125279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the Swedish STarT Back Screening Tool and the Short Form of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire in patients with acute or subacute back and neck pain. Forsbrand M; Grahn B; Hill JC; Petersson IF; Sennehed CP; Stigmar K BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Feb; 18(1):89. PubMed ID: 28222707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Somatization is associated with worse outcome in a chiropractic patient population with neck pain and low back pain. Ailliet L; Rubinstein SM; Knol D; van Tulder MW; de Vet HC Man Ther; 2016 Feb; 21():170-6. PubMed ID: 26254262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Low Risk for Persistent Back Pain Disability Is Characterized by Lower Pain Sensitivity and Higher Physical Performance. Butera KA; Fox EJ; Bishop MD; Coombes SA; Beneciuk JM; George SZ Phys Ther; 2022 Mar; 102(3):. PubMed ID: 35079824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Subgrouping low back pain: a comparison of the STarT Back Tool with the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire. Hill JC; Dunn KM; Main CJ; Hay EM Eur J Pain; 2010 Jan; 14(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 19223271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prognostic ability of the German version of the STarT Back tool: analysis of 12-month follow-up data from a randomized controlled trial. Karstens S; Krug K; Raspe H; Wunderlich M; Hochheim M; Joos S; Hüppe A BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Feb; 20(1):94. PubMed ID: 30819162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Feasibility of the STarT back screening tool in chiropractic clinics: a cross-sectional study of patients with low back pain. Kongsted A; Johannesen E; Leboeuf-Yde C Chiropr Man Therap; 2011 Apr; 19():10. PubMed ID: 21526986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prediction of outcome in patients with low back pain--A prospective cohort study comparing clinicians' predictions with those of the Start Back Tool. Kongsted A; Andersen CH; Hansen MM; Hestbaek L Man Ther; 2016 Feb; 21():120-7. PubMed ID: 26144686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability and screening ability of the StarT Back screening tool in patients with low back pain in physiotherapy practice, a cohort study. Robinson HS; Dagfinrud H BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 May; 18(1):232. PubMed ID: 28569152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using the STarT Back Tool: Does timing of stratification matter? Newell D; Field J; Pollard D Man Ther; 2015 Aug; 20(4):533-9. PubMed ID: 25175750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Can Primary Care for Back and/or Neck Pain in the Netherlands Benefit From Stratification for Risk Groups According to the STarT Back Tool Classification? Bier JD; Sandee-Geurts JJW; Ostelo RWJG; Koes BW; Verhagen AP Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2018 Jan; 99(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 28709881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the STarT Back Screening Tool for Prediction of Low Back Pain Intensity in an Outpatient Physical Therapy Setting. Toh I; Chong HC; Suet-Ching Liaw J; Pua YH J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2017 Apr; 47(4):261-267. PubMed ID: 28257616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The prognostic ability of the STarT Back Tool was affected by episode duration. Morso L; Kongsted A; Hestbaek L; Kent P Eur Spine J; 2016 Mar; 25(3):936-44. PubMed ID: 25835771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the STarT Back Tool for Arabic speaking adults with low back pain in Saudi Arabia. Elsabbagh L; Al-Atwi T; Aldossary D; Alshami AM; Hill JC; Abu-Ras W; Huijer HA; Brooks D J Orthop Sci; 2019 Mar; 24(2):200-206. PubMed ID: 30528225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The STarT Back Screening Tool for prediction of 6-month clinical outcomes: relevance of change patterns in outpatient physical therapy settings. Beneciuk JM; Fritz JM; George SZ J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2014 Sep; 44(9):656-64. PubMed ID: 25098194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The predictive ability of the STarT Back Tool was limited in people with chronic low back pain: a prospective cohort study. Kendell M; Beales D; O'Sullivan P; Rabey M; Hill J; Smith A J Physiother; 2018 Apr; 64(2):107-113. PubMed ID: 29602747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]