347 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30675336)
1. Measuring biopsychosocial risk for back pain disability in chiropractic patients using the STarT back screening tool: a cross-sectional survey.
Khan Y; Lawrence D; Vining R; Derby D
Chiropr Man Therap; 2019; 27():2. PubMed ID: 30675336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Subgrouping for patients with low back pain: a multidimensional approach incorporating cluster analysis and the STarT Back Screening Tool.
Beneciuk JM; Robinson ME; George SZ
J Pain; 2015 Jan; 16(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 25451622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clustering of patients with chronic low back pain in terms of physical and psychological factors: A cross-sectional study based on the STarT Back Screening Tool.
Yadollahpour N; Zahednejad S; Yazdi MJS; Esfandiarpour F
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2020; 33(4):581-587. PubMed ID: 31658040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Indigestion and heartburn: a descriptive study of prevalence in persons seeking care from chiropractors.
Bryner P; Staerker PG
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1996 Jun; 19(5):317-23. PubMed ID: 8792321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The STarT back screening tool and individual psychological measures: evaluation of prognostic capabilities for low back pain clinical outcomes in outpatient physical therapy settings.
Beneciuk JM; Bishop MD; Fritz JM; Robinson ME; Asal NR; Nisenzon AN; George SZ
Phys Ther; 2013 Mar; 93(3):321-33. PubMed ID: 23125279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the Swedish STarT Back Screening Tool and the Short Form of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire in patients with acute or subacute back and neck pain.
Forsbrand M; Grahn B; Hill JC; Petersson IF; Sennehed CP; Stigmar K
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Feb; 18(1):89. PubMed ID: 28222707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Somatization is associated with worse outcome in a chiropractic patient population with neck pain and low back pain.
Ailliet L; Rubinstein SM; Knol D; van Tulder MW; de Vet HC
Man Ther; 2016 Feb; 21():170-6. PubMed ID: 26254262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Subgrouping low back pain: a comparison of the STarT Back Tool with the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire.
Hill JC; Dunn KM; Main CJ; Hay EM
Eur J Pain; 2010 Jan; 14(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 19223271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Low Risk for Persistent Back Pain Disability Is Characterized by Lower Pain Sensitivity and Higher Physical Performance.
Butera KA; Fox EJ; Bishop MD; Coombes SA; Beneciuk JM; George SZ
Phys Ther; 2022 Mar; 102(3):. PubMed ID: 35079824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prognostic ability of the German version of the STarT Back tool: analysis of 12-month follow-up data from a randomized controlled trial.
Karstens S; Krug K; Raspe H; Wunderlich M; Hochheim M; Joos S; Hüppe A
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Feb; 20(1):94. PubMed ID: 30819162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Feasibility of the STarT back screening tool in chiropractic clinics: a cross-sectional study of patients with low back pain.
Kongsted A; Johannesen E; Leboeuf-Yde C
Chiropr Man Therap; 2011 Apr; 19():10. PubMed ID: 21526986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prediction of outcome in patients with low back pain--A prospective cohort study comparing clinicians' predictions with those of the Start Back Tool.
Kongsted A; Andersen CH; Hansen MM; Hestbaek L
Man Ther; 2016 Feb; 21():120-7. PubMed ID: 26144686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability and screening ability of the StarT Back screening tool in patients with low back pain in physiotherapy practice, a cohort study.
Robinson HS; Dagfinrud H
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 May; 18(1):232. PubMed ID: 28569152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using the STarT Back Tool: Does timing of stratification matter?
Newell D; Field J; Pollard D
Man Ther; 2015 Aug; 20(4):533-9. PubMed ID: 25175750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Can Primary Care for Back and/or Neck Pain in the Netherlands Benefit From Stratification for Risk Groups According to the STarT Back Tool Classification?
Bier JD; Sandee-Geurts JJW; Ostelo RWJG; Koes BW; Verhagen AP
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2018 Jan; 99(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 28709881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the STarT Back Screening Tool for Prediction of Low Back Pain Intensity in an Outpatient Physical Therapy Setting.
Toh I; Chong HC; Suet-Ching Liaw J; Pua YH
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2017 Apr; 47(4):261-267. PubMed ID: 28257616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The prognostic ability of the STarT Back Tool was affected by episode duration.
Morso L; Kongsted A; Hestbaek L; Kent P
Eur Spine J; 2016 Mar; 25(3):936-44. PubMed ID: 25835771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the STarT Back Tool for Arabic speaking adults with low back pain in Saudi Arabia.
Elsabbagh L; Al-Atwi T; Aldossary D; Alshami AM; Hill JC; Abu-Ras W; Huijer HA; Brooks D
J Orthop Sci; 2019 Mar; 24(2):200-206. PubMed ID: 30528225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The STarT Back Screening Tool for prediction of 6-month clinical outcomes: relevance of change patterns in outpatient physical therapy settings.
Beneciuk JM; Fritz JM; George SZ
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2014 Sep; 44(9):656-64. PubMed ID: 25098194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The predictive ability of the STarT Back Tool was limited in people with chronic low back pain: a prospective cohort study.
Kendell M; Beales D; O'Sullivan P; Rabey M; Hill J; Smith A
J Physiother; 2018 Apr; 64(2):107-113. PubMed ID: 29602747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
