285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30675920)
1. Species sensitivity distributions for use in environmental protection, assessment, and management of aquatic ecosystems for 12 386 chemicals.
Posthuma L; van Gils J; Zijp MC; van de Meent D; de Zwart D
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2019 Apr; 38(4):905-917. PubMed ID: 30675920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is the Effect Assessment Approach for Fungicides as Laid Down in the European Food Safety Authority Aquatic Guidance Document Sufficiently Protective for Freshwater Ecosystems?
Rico A; Brock TCM; Daam MA
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2019 Oct; 38(10):2279-2293. PubMed ID: 31211455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Exploring REACH as a potential data source for characterizing ecotoxicity in life cycle assessment.
Müller N; de Zwart D; Hauschild M; Kijko G; Fantke P
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2017 Feb; 36(2):492-500. PubMed ID: 27355758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimation of vanadium water quality benchmarks for the protection of aquatic life with relevance to the Athabasca Oil Sands region using species sensitivity distributions.
Schiffer S; Liber K
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2017 Nov; 36(11):3034-3044. PubMed ID: 28636253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can Chemical Toxicity in Saltwater Be Predicted from Toxicity in Freshwater? A Comprehensive Evaluation Using Species Sensitivity Distributions.
Yanagihara M; Hiki K; Iwasaki Y
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2022 Aug; 41(8):2021-2027. PubMed ID: 35502940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Acute and Chronic Toxicity of Cobalt to Freshwater Organisms: Using a Species Sensitivity Distribution Approach to Establish International Water Quality Standards.
Stubblefield WA; Van Genderen E; Cardwell AS; Heijerick DG; Janssen CR; De Schamphelaere KAC
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2020 Apr; 39(4):799-811. PubMed ID: 31907966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Future needs and recommendations in the development of species sensitivity distributions: Estimating toxicity thresholds for aquatic ecological communities and assessing impacts of chemical exposures.
Belanger S; Barron M; Craig P; Dyer S; Galay-Burgos M; Hamer M; Marshall S; Posthuma L; Raimondo S; Whitehouse P
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jul; 13(4):664-674. PubMed ID: 27531323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Recommendations for Improving Methods and Models for Aquatic Hazard Assessment of Ionizable Organic Chemicals.
Escher BI; Abagyan R; Embry M; Klüver N; Redman AD; Zarfl C; Parkerton TF
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2020 Feb; 39(2):269-286. PubMed ID: 31569266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Which distribution to choose for deriving a species sensitivity distribution? Implications from analysis of acute and chronic ecotoxicity data.
Yanagihara M; Hiki K; Iwasaki Y
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2024 Jun; 278():116379. PubMed ID: 38714082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improving substance information in USEtox
Saouter E; Aschberger K; Fantke P; Hauschild MZ; Bopp SK; Kienzler A; Paini A; Pant R; Secchi M; Sala S
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2017 Dec; 36(12):3450-3462. PubMed ID: 28618056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Environmental benchmarks based on ecotoxicological assessment with planktonic species might not adequately protect benthic assemblages in lotic systems.
Vidal T; Santos JI; Queirós L; Ré A; Abrantes N; Gonçalves FJM; Pereira JL
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Jun; 668():1289-1297. PubMed ID: 31018468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Screening-Level Estimates of Environmental Release Rates, Predicted Exposures, and Toxic Pressures of Currently Used Chemicals.
van de Meent D; de Zwart D; Posthuma L
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2020 Sep; 39(9):1839-1851. PubMed ID: 32539202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Setting water quality criteria in China: approaches for developing species sensitivity distributions for metals and metalloids.
Liu Y; Wu F; Mu Y; Feng C; Fang Y; Chen L; Giesy JP
Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2014; 230():35-57. PubMed ID: 24609517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment and management of pesticide pollution at a river basin level part I: Aquatic ecotoxicological quality indices.
Tsaboula A; Papadakis EN; Vryzas Z; Kotopoulou A; Kintzikoglou K; Papadopoulou-Mourkidou E
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Feb; 653():1597-1611. PubMed ID: 30177275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Species sensitivity distribution for pentachlorophenol to aquatic organisms based on interval ecotoxicological data.
Zhao J; Zhang R
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2017 Nov; 145():193-199. PubMed ID: 28734222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Are we going about chemical risk assessment for the aquatic environment the wrong way?
Johnson AC; Sumpter JP
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2016 Jul; 35(7):1609-16. PubMed ID: 27331653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A framework for ecological risk assessment of metal mixtures in aquatic systems.
Nys C; Van Regenmortel T; Janssen CR; Oorts K; Smolders E; De Schamphelaere KAC
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2018 Mar; 37(3):623-642. PubMed ID: 29135043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Aquatic exposures of chemical mixtures in urban environments: Approaches to impact assessment.
de Zwart D; Adams W; Galay Burgos M; Hollender J; Junghans M; Merrington G; Muir D; Parkerton T; De Schamphelaere KAC; Whale G; Williams R
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2018 Mar; 37(3):703-714. PubMed ID: 28861906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Augmenting aquatic species sensitivity distributions with interspecies toxicity estimation models.
Awkerman JA; Raimondo S; Jackson CR; Barron MG
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2014 Mar; 33(3):688-95. PubMed ID: 24214839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An analysis of potential bias in the sensitivity of toxicity data used to construct sensitivity distributions for copper.
Croteau K; Santore R; DeForest D; Baken S
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2019 May; 15(3):437-447. PubMed ID: 30609308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
