These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

539 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30676631)

  • 1. Using the E-Value to Assess the Potential Effect of Unmeasured Confounding in Observational Studies.
    Haneuse S; VanderWeele TJ; Arterburn D
    JAMA; 2019 Feb; 321(6):602-603. PubMed ID: 30676631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of bariatric surgery on incidence of obesity-related cancers: a meta-analysis.
    Yang XW; Li PZ; Zhu LY; Zhu S
    Med Sci Monit; 2015 May; 21():1350-7. PubMed ID: 25961664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Addressing unmeasured confounding in comparative observational research.
    Zhang X; Faries DE; Li H; Stamey JD; Imbens GW
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2018 Apr; 27(4):373-382. PubMed ID: 29383840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Indirect adjustment of relative risks of an exposure with multiple categories for an unmeasured confounder.
    Lubin JH; Hauptmann M; Blair A
    Ann Epidemiol; 2018 Nov; 28(11):801-807. PubMed ID: 30297163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sensitivity Analysis in Observational Research: Introducing the E-Value.
    VanderWeele TJ; Ding P
    Ann Intern Med; 2017 Aug; 167(4):268-274. PubMed ID: 28693043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bariatric surgery and pain outcomes in osteoarthritis.
    Katz JN; Selzer F; Robinson MK
    Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2021 Oct; 29(10):1383-1385. PubMed ID: 34339823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Limitations and Misinterpretations of E-Values for Sensitivity Analyses of Observational Studies.
    Ioannidis JPA; Tan YJ; Blum MR
    Ann Intern Med; 2019 Jan; 170(2):108-111. PubMed ID: 30597486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sensitivity Analysis for Unmeasured Confounding: E-Values for Observational Studies.
    Localio AR; Stack CB; Griswold ME
    Ann Intern Med; 2017 Aug; 167(4):285-286. PubMed ID: 28693037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Sensitivity analysis method for unmeasured confounding interference in observational study].
    Wang DH; You DF; Huang LL; Zhao Y
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Nov; 40(11):1470-1475. PubMed ID: 31838823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bariatric Surgery: Overview of Procedures and Outcomes.
    Azagury DE; Morton JM
    Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am; 2016 Sep; 45(3):647-56. PubMed ID: 27519136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Confounding, effect modification, and the odds ratio: common misinterpretations.
    Shrier I; Pang M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 68(4):470-4. PubMed ID: 25662008
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hidden biases in observational epidemiology: the case of unmeasured confounding.
    Ananth CV; Schisterman EF
    BJOG; 2018 May; 125(6):644-646. PubMed ID: 29030998
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. "A Bayesian sensitivity analysis to evaluate the impact of unmeasured confounding with external data: a real world comparative effectiveness study in osteoporosis".
    Zhang X; Faries DE; Boytsov N; Stamey JD; Seaman JW
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2016 Sep; 25(9):982-92. PubMed ID: 27396534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bariatric surgery highlights in the International Journal of Obesity.
    Atkinson RL; Macdonald I
    Int J Obes (Lond); 2012 Mar; 36(3):327. PubMed ID: 22411033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On a preference-based instrumental variable approach in reducing unmeasured confounding-by-indication.
    Li Y; Lee Y; Wolfe RA; Morgenstern H; Zhang J; Port FK; Robinson BM
    Stat Med; 2015 Mar; 34(7):1150-68. PubMed ID: 25546152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Handling time varying confounding in observational research.
    Mansournia MA; Etminan M; Danaei G; Kaufman JS; Collins G
    BMJ; 2017 Oct; 359():j4587. PubMed ID: 29038130
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Re: Comparative effectiveness of prostate cancer treatments: evaluating statistical adjustments for confounding in observational data.
    Weiss NS; Hutter CM
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2011 Aug; 103(16):1277. PubMed ID: 21788593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bariatric surgery in patients with morbid obesity and type 2 diabetes.
    Schernthaner G; Morton JM
    Diabetes Care; 2008 Feb; 31 Suppl 2():S297-302. PubMed ID: 18227500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bayesian modeling of cost-effectiveness studies with unmeasured confounding: a simulation study.
    Stamey JD; Beavers DP; Faries D; Price KL; Seaman JW
    Pharm Stat; 2014; 13(1):94-100. PubMed ID: 24446072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of bariatric surgery on cardiovascular and musculoskeletal morbidity.
    Sampalis JS; Sampalis F; Christou N
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2006; 2(6):587-91. PubMed ID: 16996318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.