These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30677117)

  • 1. Cost-Utility Analysis of Molar Single Implant Versus Fixed Dental Prosthesis.
    Teranishi Y; Arai K; Baba S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2019; 32(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 30677117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness of molar single-implant versus fixed dental prosthesis.
    Korenori A; Koji K; Yuki T; Murata T; Sachiko TM; Shunsuke B
    BMC Oral Health; 2018 Aug; 18(1):141. PubMed ID: 30126400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-utility analysis of an implant treatment in dentistry.
    Losenická J; Gajdoš O; Kamenský V
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Sep; 21(1):433. PubMed ID: 34488727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Implant-Supported Single Crown and Tooth-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses in Türkiye.
    Tekpınar L; Yiğit V
    Value Health Reg Issues; 2024 Jul; 42():100979. PubMed ID: 38340673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Changes in patient and FDP profiles following the introduction of osseointegrated implant dentistry in a prosthodontic practice.
    Walton TR
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(2):127-35. PubMed ID: 19418856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mechanosensation and maximum bite force in edentulous patients rehabilitated with bimaxillary implant-supported fixed dental prostheses.
    Luraschi J; Schimmel M; Bernard JP; Gallucci GO; Belser U; Müller F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 May; 23(5):577-83. PubMed ID: 22092337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Masseter muscle thickness, chewing efficiency and bite force in edentulous patients with fixed and removable implant-supported prostheses: a cross-sectional multicenter study.
    Müller F; Hernandez M; Grütter L; Aracil-Kessler L; Weingart D; Schimmel M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Feb; 23(2):144-150. PubMed ID: 21631592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. EAO consensus conference: economic evaluation of implant-supported prostheses.
    Beikler T; Flemmig TF
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Sep; 26 Suppl 11():57-63. PubMed ID: 26077930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Economic evaluation of single-tooth replacement: dental implant versus fixed partial denture.
    Kim Y; Park JY; Park SY; Oh SH; Jung Y; Kim JM; Yoo SY; Kim SK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(3):600-7. PubMed ID: 24818198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Cost-Effectiveness of Dual Mobility Implants for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Computer-Based Cost-Utility Model.
    Barlow BT; McLawhorn AS; Westrich GH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 May; 99(9):768-777. PubMed ID: 28463921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-Effectiveness of Total Hip Arthroplasty Versus Nonoperative Management in Normal, Overweight, Obese, Severely Obese, Morbidly Obese, and Super Obese Patients: A Markov Model.
    Ponnusamy KE; Vasarhelyi EM; McCalden RW; Somerville LE; Marsh JD
    J Arthroplasty; 2018 Dec; 33(12):3629-3636. PubMed ID: 30266324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost-effectiveness of implant-supported dental prosthesis compared to conventional dental prosthesis.
    Probst LF; Vanni T; Cavalcante DFB; Silva ETD; Cavalcanti YW; Passeri LA; Pereira AC
    Rev Saude Publica; 2019 Aug; 53():. PubMed ID: 31432931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical Effectiveness of 6.5-mm-Long Implants to Support Two-Implant Fixed Prostheses in Premolar-Molar Region: The Influence of Immediate Loading and the Length of Splinting Implant.
    Anitua E; Flores C; Flores J; Alkhraisat MH
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e688-e693. PubMed ID: 29377338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical evaluation of tooth- and implant-supported fixed dental prostheses with various nonrigid connector positions: a finite element analysis.
    Burak Özcelik T; Ersoy E; Yilmaz B
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Jan; 20(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 21251117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Subjective values of different treatments for missing molars in older Japanese.
    Ikebe K; Hazeyama T; Kagawa R; Matsuda K; Maeda Y
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Dec; 37(12):892-9. PubMed ID: 20633073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating the health economic implications and cost-effectiveness of dental implants: a literature review.
    Vogel R; Smith-Palmer J; Valentine W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):343-56. PubMed ID: 23527335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost-effectiveness of implant-supported mandibular removable partial dentures.
    Jensen C; Ross J; Feenstra TL; Raghoebar GM; Speksnijder C; Meijer HJA; Cune MS
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 May; 28(5):594-601. PubMed ID: 27080041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Economic Decision Model for First-Time Traumatic Patellar Dislocations in Adolescents.
    Nwachukwu BU; So C; Schairer WW; Shubin Stein BE; Strickland SM; Green DW; Dodwell ER
    Am J Sports Med; 2017 Aug; 45(10):2267-2275. PubMed ID: 28463547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tooth-implant-supported posterior fixed dental prostheses with zirconia frameworks: 3-year clinical result.
    Beuer F; Sachs C; Groesser J; Gueth JF; Stimmelmayr M
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Jun; 20(5):1079-86. PubMed ID: 26399980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of survival and complication rates of tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and implant-supported FDPs and single crowns (SCs).
    Pjetursson BE; Brägger U; Lang NP; Zwahlen M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Jun; 18 Suppl 3():97-113. PubMed ID: 17594374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.